Rapid D-dimer test combined a clinical model for deep vein thrombosis

Summary

An optimal approach to the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in lower limbs in the emergency department is still unknown. In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the widely available plasma D-dimer test (VIDAS) and establish the usefulness of combining D-dimer testing with a clinical model to reduce the need for serial ultrasonographies and improve the diagnostic strategy of DVT. We performed a cohort study in 383 consecutive outpatients referred to the emergency department of Hospital La Princesa, with clinical suspicion of DVT. The patients were stratified into three pre-test probability categories using an explicit clinical model (Wells score), and underwent a quantitative automated ELISA D-dimer assay (VIDAS D-Dimer® bioMérieux). Patients were managed according to the diagnostic strategy based on clinical probability and compression ultrasonography (CU). Patients for whom DVT was considered a high pre-test probability with negative ultrasonographic findings in the initial CU, returned the following week for repeat ultrasonography. All patients with DVT excluded did not receive anticoagulant therapy, and were followed up for three months to monitor the development of venous thromboembolic complications. DVT was confirmed in 102 patients (26.6%): 95 in the initial test, four in the second test, and three who developed venous thromboembolic complications in the three-month follow-up period. The calculated D-dimer cut-off level was 1 µg/ml. One hundred patients (98%) with DVT had positive D-dimer. D-dimer had a sensitivity of 98% and a negative predictive value of 98.6%. Among the high-probability patients with positive D-dimer tests and initial negative CU, 9.75% had DVT on repeat CU at one week. The study results suggest that the addition of VIDAS D-dimer to this diagnostic algorithm could improve the management of patients with suspected DVT in daily practice. A diagnostic approach of DVT based on D-dimer (cut-off ≥1 μg/ml) as the first diagnostic tool for the exclusion of DVT, and the clinical probability model as the tool that identifies those patients requiring a second ultrasonography is useful and suitable for daily medical practice.

Keywords

Deep vein thrombosis - diagnosis - D-dimer - clinical model - emergency

• References

• 1 Botella FG, Labiós-Gómez M, Brasó-Aznar JV. Deep venous thrombosis: present and future. Med Clin (Barc) 2000; 114: 584-96.
• 2 Kahn SR. The clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: integrating incidence, risk factors and symptoms and signs. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 2315-23.
• 3 Anand SS, Wells PS, Hunt D. et al. Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis?. JAMA 1998; 279: 1094-9.
• 4 Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. For the McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 663-77.
• 5 Heijboer H, Buller HR, Lensing AW. et al. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1365-9.
• 6 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J. The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 1044-9.
• 7 Birdwell B, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. et al. The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 1-7.
• 8 Cogo A, Lensing AW, Koopman MM. et al. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: a prospective cohort study. Br Med J 1998; 316: 17-20.
• 9 Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Compression ultrasonography for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis. Repeat testing is unjustified. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1534-5.
• 10 Friera A, Ruiz-Giménez N, Caballero P, Suárez C. Deep vein thrombosis: can the second sonographic examination be avoided?. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1001-5.
• 11 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-8.
• 12 Michiels JJ, Freyburger G, van der Graaf F. et al. Strategies for the safe and effective exclusion and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis by the sequential use of clinical score, Ddimer testing, and compression ultrasonography. Semin Thromb Hemost 2000; 26: 657-67.
• 13 Kraaijenhagen RA, Piovella F, Bernardi E. et al. Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162 (08) 907-11.
• 14 Bernardi E, Prandoni P, Lensing AW. et al. Ddimer testing as an adjunct to ultrasonography in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 1998; 317: 1037-40.
• 15 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-5.
• 16 Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Douketis J. et al. The use of D-dimer testing and impedance plethysmographic examination in patients with clinical indications of deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 1077-81.
• 17 Hirsh J, Lee AY. How we diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis. Blood 2002; 99: 3102-10.
• 18 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR. et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345: 1326-30.
• 19 Ruiz-Giménez N, Friera A, Caballero P. et al. Deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities in an emergency department. Utility of a clinical diagnosis model. Med Clin (Barc) 2002; 118: 529-33.
• 20 Trujillo-Santos AJ, García de Lucas MD. Utilidad del exámen clínico y del dímero-D en el diagnóstico de la trombosis venosa profunda. Clin (Barc) 2000; 115: 47.
• 21 Landerfeld CS, McGuire E, Cohen AM. Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: a basic for quantifying clinical judgement. Am J Med 1990; 88: 382-8.
• 22 Cornuz J, Ghali WA, Hayoz D. et al. Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative D-dimer testing. Am J Med 2002; 112: 198-203.
• 23 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. et al. SimpliRED D-dimer can reduce the diagnostic test in suspected deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 1998; 351: 1405-6.
• 24 Freyburger G, Trillaud H, Labrouche S. et al. D-dimer strategy in thrombosis exclusion. A gold standard study in 100 patients suspected of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: 8 DD methods compared. Thromb Haemos 1998; 79: 32-7.
• 25 van der Graaf F, van den Borne H, van der Kolk M. et al. Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing. Comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 191-8.
• 26 Crippa L, D’Angelo SV, Tomassini L. et al. The utility and cost-effectiveness of D-dimer measurements in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Haematologica 1997; 82: 446-51.
• 27 Janssen MC, Heebels AE, de Metz M. et al. Reliability of five rapid D-dimer assays compared to ELISA in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77: 262-6.
• 28 Elias A, Aptel I, Huc B. et al. D-dimer test and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: a comparative study of 7 assays. Thromb Haemost 1996; 76: 518-22.
• 29 Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Bachhuber TL. et al. D-dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism. A shortcut to accurate diagnosis?. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 939-46.
• 30 Janssen MC, Wollersheim H, Verbruggen H, Novakova IR. Rapid D-Dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: current status and new developments. Semin Thromb Hemost 1998; 24: 393-400.
• 31 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Goehring C. et al. Ddimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in outpatients. Am J Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 492-6.
• 32 Bounameaux H. Rapid diagnosis of deep vein trombosis in symptomatic patients: a comparison between four different diagnostic strategies. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82: 1360-1.
• 33 Perone N, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Comparison of four strategies for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Med 2001; 110: 33-40.
• 34 Anderson DR, Wells PS, Stiell I. et al. Management of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department: combining use of a clinical diagnosis model with D-dimer testing. J Emerg Med 2000; 19: 225-230.
• 35 D’Angelo A, D’Alessandro G, Tomassini L. et al. Evaluation of a new rapid quantitative Ddimer assay in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 412-6.
• 36 de Moerloose P, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. et al. Performances of the VIDAS D-dimer new assay for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 185-6.
• 37 Aschwanden M. Karl-Heinz Labs, Jeanneret C, et al. The value of rapid D-dimer testing combined with structured clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30: 929-35.
• 38 Lennox AF, Delis KT, Serunkuma S. et al. Combination of a clinical risk assessment score and rapid whole blood D-dimer testing in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30: 794-804.
• 39 Siragusa S, Terulla V, Pirrelli S. et al. A rapid D-dimer assay in patients presenting at an emergency room with suspected acute venous thrombosis: accuracy and relation to clinical variables. Haematologica 2001; 86: 856-61.
• 40 Borg JY, Levesque H, Cailleux N. et al. Rapid quantitative D-dimer assay and clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis [letter]. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77: 602-3.