Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Literacy Teams: Facing the Challenges, Forging Ahead

ABSTRACT

The development of literacy skills in individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) requires the collective efforts of collaborative literacy teams who have expertise in language, literacy, and AAC. Literacy teams responsible for teaching reading and writing skills to students with complex communication needs face many challenges including students who often cannot participate in conventional literacy activities (e.g., reading aloud), a lack of materials and resources, and poor professional preparation in the area of AAC and literacy. In the ongoing effort to improve the quality and effectiveness of literacy services provided to students who use AAC, it is important to evaluate the professional expertise of personnel involved in literacy assessment and intervention. This article uses the current research base to provide a discussion of several issues and challenges faced by school-based literacy teams who provide reading and writing services to students with complex communication needs. Future goals and directions for literacy teams striving to provide effective reading and writing services are also explored in a discussion aimed at the advancement of school-based literacy services for students who use AAC.

Augmentative and alternative communication - literacy - personnel preparation - schools - speech-language pathologists - professional development

REFERENCES

• 1 Foley B E, Pollatsek A. Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments.  Augment Altern Commun. 1999;  15 156-173
• 2 Vandervelden M, Siegel L. Phonological processing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments.  Augment Altern Commun. 1999;  15 191-211
• 3 Fallon K A, Light J, McNaughton D, Drager K, Hammer C. The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;  47 1424-1439
• 4 Millar D, Light J, McNaughton D. The effect of direct instruction and writers workshop on the early writing skills of children who use augmentative and alternative communication.  Augment Altern Commun. 2004;  20 164-178
• 5 Dahlgren-Sandberg A D. Reading and spelling abilities in children with severe speech impairments and cerebral palsy at 6, 9, and 12 years of age in relation to cognitive development: a longitudinal study.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;  48 629-634
• 6 Dahlgren-Sandberg A, Hjelmquist E. Phonologic awareness and literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy.  Augment Altern Commun. 1996;  12 138-154
• 7 Sturm J M, Spadorcia S A, Cunningham J W et al.. What happens to reading between first and third grade? Implications for students who use AAC.  Augment Altern Commun. 2006;  22 21-36
• 8 National Reading Panel .Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups. Washington, DC; U.S. Government Printing Office 2000 NIH Publication No. 00–4754
• 9 Koppenhaver D A, Evans D A, Yoder D E. Childhood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments.  Augment Altern Commun. 1991;  7 20-33
• 10 Koppenhaver D A, Yoder D E. Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): What is and what might be.  Top Lang Disord. 1993;  13 1-15
• 11 Fallon K A, Katz L A. Written language & AAC in the Schools: a national survey. Poster presented at: ASHA National Conference 2007 Boston, MA;
• 12 Simpson K, Beukelman D, Bird A. Survey of school speech and language service provision to students with severe communication impairments in Nebraska.  Augment Altern Commun. 1998;  14 212-221
• 13 Stark C, Kent-Walsh J, Binger C. School-based AAC service delivery survey: demographic, service-delivery and SLP training. Paper presented at: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention November 16, 2007 Boston, MA;
• 14 Lund S K, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part III – contributing factors.  Augment Altern Commun. 2007;  23 323-335
• 15 Koppenhaver D A, Hendrix M P, Williams A R. Toward evidence-based literacy interventions for children with severe and multiple disabilities.  Semin Speech Lang. 2007;  28 79-89
• 16 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Scope of Practice for Speech Language Pathology. Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2001
• 17 Staskowski M. Reaching for the stars: SLPs shine on literacy teams.  Semin Speech Lang. 2003;  24 199-214
• 18 Ratcliff A, Koul R, Lloyd L. Preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: an update for speech-language pathology training.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;  17 48-59
• 19 Butler K, Nelson N, Roth F, Paul D. Partnerships for Literacy: Principles and Practices. Baltimore, MD; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006
• 20 Ehren B J, Ehren T C. New or expanded literacy roles for speech-language pathologists: making it happen in the schools.  Semin Speech Lang. 2001;  22 233-242
• 21 Soto G, Muller E, Hunt P, Goetz L. Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: a team perspective.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001;  32 51-56