Pelvic Pain, Adnexal Masses, and Ultrasound

ABSTRACT

Pelvic pain, acute or chronic, accounts for more than 10% of referrals to gynecologists. Pain accounts for more than 40% of gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopies. Predicting operative findings is critical in planning surgical interventions, as well as preoperative and postoperative medical therapy. Ultrasound is useful in preoperative evaluation and in predicting surgical findings. This section reviews the use of various ultrasound modalities in evaluating adnexal masses and associated pelvic pain. Morphologic assessment with two-dimensional (2-D) ultrasound is the foundation for adnexal evaluation. The ultrasound morphology of common ovarian and adnexal masses is reviewed. The application and reliability of Doppler assessment is also reviewed. New advances, such as three-dimensional (3-D) sonography, 3-D vascular assessment, and contrast imaging, augment diagnostic accuracy. These advances may find future application in the clinical evaluation of patients. This section reviews the application of 2-D morphology, Doppler analysis, 3-D morphology, rendering and vascular assessment, and the use of contrast agents in the ultrasound evaluation of patients with adnexal masses and pelvic pain.

KEYWORDS

Ultrasonography - adnexal masses - pelvic pain

REFERENCES

• 1 ACOG . Chronic pelvic pain.  ACOG Practice Bulletin. 2004;  51 1-17
• 2 Mathias S D, Kuppermann M, Liberman R F, Lipschutz R, Steege J. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, heath-related quality of life, and economic correlates.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  87 321-327
• 3 Reiter R C. Chronic pelvic pain.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990;  33 130-138
• 4 Howard F M. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls.  Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1993;  48 357-387
• 5 Carter J E. Combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic findings in patients with chronic pelvic pain.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;  2 43-47
• 6 Shwayder J M, Burcher D. Use of transvaginal sonography prior to operative endoscopy.  J Am Assc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;  1 S31
• 7 Webb E M, Green G E, Scoutt L M. Adnexal mass with pelvic pain.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;  42 329-348
• 8 Sassone A, Timor-Tritsch I, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren W. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  78 70-76
• 9 Benacerraf B R, Finkler N J, Wojciechowski C, Knapp R C. Sonographic accuracy in the diagnosis of ovarian masses.  J Reprod Med. 1990;  35 491-495
• 10 Finkler N J, Benacerraf B, Lavin P T et al.. Comparison of serum CA 125, clinical impression and ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses.  Obstet Gynecol. 1988;  72 659-664
• 11 Granberg S, Norsrom A, Wikland M. Tumors in the lower pelvis as imaged by vaginal sonography.  Gynecol Oncol. 1990;  37 224-229
• 12 Herrman U J, Locher G W, Goldhirsch A. Sonographic patterns of ovarian tumors: Prediction of malignancy.  Obstet Gynecol. 1987;  69 777-781
• 13 Kobayashi M. Use of diagnostic ultrasound in trophoblastic neoplasms and ovarian tumors.  Cancer. 1976;  38 441-446
• 14 Meire H B, Farrant P, Guha T. Distinction of benign from malignant ovarian cysts by ultrasound.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978;  85 893-899
• 15 Timmerman D, Testa A, Bourne T et al.. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.  J Clin Oncol. 2005;  23 8794-8801
• 16 Timmerman D, Testo A, Bourne T. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.  J Clin Oncol. 2005;  23 8794-8801
• 17 Fleischer A C, Rodgers W H, Kepple D M et al.. Color Doppler sonography of ovarian masses: a multiparameter analysis.  J Ultrasound Med. 1993;  12 41-48
• 18 Lynch H T, Albano W A, Lynch J F et al.. Surveillance and management of patients at high risk for ovarian cancer.  Obstet Gynecol. 1982;  59 589-596
• 19 Piver M S, Hempling R E. Etiology and screening of ovarian cancer. In: Thompson JD, Rock JA Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia, PA; JB Lippincott 1993: 1-13
• 20 Whittemore A S, Harris R, Itnyre F. Group tCOC. Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies.  Am J Epidemiol. 1992;  136 1184-1203
• 21 Barber H, Graber E. The PMPO syndrome (postmenopausal palpable ovary syndrome).  Obstet Gynecol. 1971;  38 921-923
• 22 Modesitt S C, Pavlik E J, Ueland F R, DePriest P D, Kryscio R J, vanNagell J. J.R. Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 centimeters in diameter.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  102 594-599
• 23 Jenkins S, Olive D L, Haney A F. Endometriosis: pathogenic implication of the anatomic distribution.  Obstet Gynecol. 1986;  67 335-338
• 24 Mais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Angiolucci M, Paoletti A M, Melis G B. The efficiency of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrioma.  Fertil Steril. 1993;  60 776-780
• 25 Volpi E, DeGrandis T, Zuccaro G, LaVista A, Sismondi P. Role of transvaginal sonography in the detection of endometriomata.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1995;  23 163-167
• 26 Kurjak A, Kupesic S. Scoring system for prediction of ovarian endometriosis based on transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler sonography.  Fertil Steril. 1994;  62 81-87
• 27 Kupfer M C, Schwimer S R, Lebovic J. Transvaginal sonographic appearance of endometriomata: spectrum of findings.  J Ultrasound Med. 1992;  11 129-133
• 28 Alcazar J L, Laparte C, Jurado M, Lopez-Garcia G. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography combined with color velocity imaging and pulsed Doppler in the diagnosis of endometrioma.  Fertil Steril. 1997;  67 487-491
• 29 Shwayder J M. The dysfunctional pelvis: endometriosis. In: Benson CB, Goldstein SR Imaging in the Infertile Couple. London; Marin Dunitz 2001: 174-196
• 30 ASRM . Endometriosis and infertility.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 1441-1446
• 31 Comerci J TJ, Licciardi F, Bergh P A, Gregori C, Breen J L. Mature cystic teratoma: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 517 cases and review of the literature.  Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  84 22-28
• 32 Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S. A comparison of ‘pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  18 357-365
• 33 Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne T H, Collins W P, Verrelst H, Vergote I. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion for the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  16 500-505
• 34 Wu C C, Lee C N, Chen T M et al.. Incremental angiogenesis assessed by color Doppler ultrasound in the tumorogenesis of ovarian neoplasms.  Cancer. 1994;  73 1251-1256
• 35 Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osbourne N. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses.  Gynecol Oncol. 1995;  59 129-135
• 36 Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, Bekavac I. Preoperative evaluation of pelvic tumors by Doppler and three-dimensional sonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 2001;  20 829-840
• 37 Alcazar J L, Galan M J, Garcia-Manero M. Three-dimensional sonographic morphological assessment in complex adnexal masses: preliminary experience.  J Ultrasound Med. 2003;  22 249-254
• 38 Fleischer A C, Milam M R, Crispins M A, Shappell H W. Sonographic depiction of intratumoral vascularity with 2- and 3-dimensional color Doppler techniques.  J Ultrasound Med. 2005;  24 533-537
• 39 Kurjak A, Prka M, Arenas J et al.. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler in ovarian cancer screening of asymptomatic peri- and postmenopausal women.  Croat Med J. 2005;  46 757-764
• 40 Testa A, Ferrandina G, Fruscella E et al.. The use of contrast transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of gynecologic disease: a preliminary study.  J Ultrasound Med. 2005;  24 1267-1278
• 41 Orden M, Gudmundsson S, Kirkinen P. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the examination of benign and malignant adnexal masses.  J Ultrasound Med. 2000;  19 783-788
• 42 Marret H, Sauget S, Giradudeau B et al.. Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses.  J Ultrasound Med. 2004;  23 1629-1639