The Miethke Dual Switch Valve: Experience in 169 Adult Patients with Different Kinds of Hydrocephalus: An Open Field Study

Abstract

Object: In spite of the development of approximately 200 different shunt systems within the last 50 years, overdrainage and valve obstructions are still major problems in the current treatment of hydrocephalus. In 1994, a new gravitational valve with different opening pressures (depending upon the patient's posture) and a big contact area to CSF was introduced by Miethke and co-workers (DSV). We report about a single institution's experience in the treatment of 169 adult patients with different kinds of hydrocephalus with this valve.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological data of all patients who were treated with a DSV between 1998 and 2005 at our institution. A telephone interview was perfomed at the end of the study, to determine the overall shunt survival. We analysed the outcome and the shunt-related complications.

Results: Among 169 patients with DSV, we had 70 patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), 40 patients with communicating hydrocephalus due to SAH, 31 patients with communicating hydrocephalus not due to SAH and 28 patients with occlusive hydrocephalus. We had a rate of shunt responders of 93.2%, an overdrainage rate of 3.2% and no valve obstruction in the whole series. The overall shunt survival was 81% after 82 months (mean follow-up: 47.6 months). All implantations were performed by the whole staff, as well as by residents of the neurosurgical department.

Discussion: Among the currently available shunt systems, this series is one with the lowest complication rates due to overdrainage and valve obstructions. In patients with NPH, where low opening pressures are essential, the DSV seems to bear an advantage because of a high drainage rate and, in spite of this, a low rate of overdrainage. Even in patients with relatively high CSF protein content, we did not observe any valve obstruction. This study was an open field analysis providing data about the current complication rates of hydrocephalus treatment with this shunt system, outside of a specialized hydrocephalus team or a prospective study trial. However, this study is a retrospective analysis and a prospective randomized controlled trial is required for the comparison of these valves with other shunt systems, such as programmable and flow-controlled ones is required for the future.

Key words

hydrocephalus - complications - overdrainage - Miethke dual switch valve - DSV - shunt systems

References

• 1 Aschoff A. In vitro Testung von Hydrocephalus-Ventilen. Habilitation thesis. University of Heidelberg 1994
• 2 Aschoff A, Benesch C, Kremer P. et al . The solved and unsolved problems of hydrocephalus-valves. A critical comment.  Adv Neurosurg. 1993;  21 103-114
• 3 Drake MJ, Sainte-Rose C. The shunt book. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, USA 1995
• 4 Nulsen F, Spitz E. Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricular to jugular vein.  Surg Forum. 1952;  399-403
• 5 Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Richards HK, Pickard JR. Posture-related overdrainage: comparison of the performance of 10 hydrocephalus shunts in vitro.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  42 327-334
• 6 Grumme T, Kolodziejczyk D. Komplikationen in der Neurochirurgie II. Kraniale, zerebrale und neuropädiatrische Chirurgie. Blackwell, Berlin 534-540
• 7 Pudenz R, Foltz F. Hydrocephalus: overdrainage by ventricular shunts: a review and recommendations.  Surg Neurol. 1991;  35 200-212
• 8 Renier D, Lacombe J, Pierre-Kahn A, Sainte-Rose C, Hirsch J-F. Factors causing acute shunt infection: Computer analysis of 1174 operations.  J Neurosurg. 1984;  61 1072-1078
• 9 Reinprecht A, Czech T, Dietrich W. Clinical experience with a new pressure-adjustable shunt valve.  Acta Neurochirurgica Wien. 1995;  134 119-124
• 10 Saint-Rose C. Shunt obstruction: a preventable complication?.  Pediatric Neurosurgery. 1993;  19 156-164
• 11 Yamashita N, Kamiya K, Yamada K. Experience with a programmable valve shunt system.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  91 26-31
• 12 Zemack G, Romner B. Seven years of clinical experience with the programmable Codman Hakim valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  92 941-948
• 13 Frim D, Goumnerova L. In vivo intracranial pressare dynamics in patients with hydrocephalus treated by shunt placement.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  92 927-932
• 14 Chapman P, Cosman E, Arnold M. The relationship between ventricular ventricular fluid pressure and body position in normal subjects and subjects with shunts: a telemetric study.  Neurosurgery. 1990;  261 181-189
• 15 Decq P, Barat JL, Duplessis E, Lequerinel C, Gendrault P, Keravel Y. Shunt failure in adult hydrocephalus: flow-controlled shunt versus differential pressure shunts - a cooperative study in 289 patients.  Surgical Neurology. 1995;  43 333-339
• 16 Hanlo P, Cinalli G, Vandertop W. et al . Treatment of hydrocephalus determined by the european Orbis Sigma Valve II survey: a multicenter prospective 5-year shunt survival study in children and adults in whom a flow-regulating shunt was used.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  99 52-57
• 17 Miethke C, Affeld K. A new valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus.  Biomedizinische Technik. 1994;  39 181-187
• 18 Kiefer M, Eymann R, Mascaros V, Walter M, Steudel W. Significance of hydrostatic valves in therapy of chronic hydrocephalus.  Nervenarzt. 2000;  7 975-986
• 19 Kiefer M, Eymann R, Meier U. Five years experience with gravitational shunts in chronic hydrocephalus of adults.  Acta Neurochirurgica. 2002;  144 755-767
• 20 Kiefer M, Eymann R, Steudel W, Strowitzki M. Gravitational shunt manageement of long standing overt ventriculomegaly in adult (LOVA) hydrocephalus.  J Clin Neurosci. 2004; 
• 21 Meier U. Outcome of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after surgery with gravity valves.  Neurosurgery Quarterly. 2004;  14 119-126
• 22 Meier U, Kintzel D. Clinical experience with different valve systems in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation of the Miethke dual-switch valve.  ChildŽs Nervous system. 2002;  18 288-294
• 23 Meier U, Kiefer M, Sprung C. Evaluation des Miethke-Dual-Switch-Ventils bei Patienten mit Normaldruckhydrozephalus.  Aktuelle Neurologie. 2000;  27 435-441
• 24 Meier U, Zeilinger FS, Reyer T, Kintzel D. Klinische Erfahrungen mit verschiedenen Shuntsystemen beim Normaldruckhydrozephalus.  Zentralblatt Neurochirurgie. 2000;  61 143-149
• 25 Hertel F, Walter C, Schmitt M, Mörsdorf M, Jammers W, Busch HP, Bettag M. Is a combination of Tc-SPECT or perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging with spinal tap test helpful in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus?.  JNNP. 2003;  74 479-484
• 26 Hebb A, Cusimano M. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A systematic review of diagnosis and outcome.  Neurosurgery. 2001;  49 1166-1184
• 27 Pollack I, Albright A, Adelson P. et al . A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Hakim-Medos investigator group.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  45 1399-1411
• 28 Tribl G, Oder W. Outcome after shunt implantation in severe head injury with posttraumatic hydrocephalus.  Brain Inj. 2000;  14 345-354
• 29 Boon A, Tans J, Delwel E. et al . Dutch normal pressure hydrocephalus study: randomized comparison of low- and medium-pressure shunts.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  88 490-495
• 30 Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ. et al . The Dutch normal pressure hydrocephalus study.  Surgical Neurology. 2000;  53 201-207
• 31 Sprung C, Miethke C, Trost HA, Lanksch WR. The dual-switch valve.  Child's Nervous System. 1996;  12 573-581
• 32 Cardoso ER, Del Bigio MR. Age-related changes of cerebral ventricular size.  Acta Neurochirurgica Wien. 1998;  42 327-334
• 33 Bentzel EC, Pelletier AL, Levy PG. Communicating hydrocephalus in adults: prediction of outcome after ventricular shunting procedures.  Neurosurgery. 1990;  26 655-660
• 34 Gruber A, Reinprecht A, Bavinski G, Czech T, Richling B. Chronic shunt dependent hydrocephalus after early surgical and early endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 503-512

Correspondence