An Economic Argument in Favour of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy as a Treatment for Obstructive Hydrocephalus

Abstract

This project was undertaken to examine the health resource implications of performing endoscopic third ventriculostomy as an alternative to CSF shunting in appropriate patients. We carried out a retrospective study of case records and X-rays of patients shunted de novo at the INS, Glasgow for the two year period 1990 - 1991.We identified all those patients who would have been suitable for endoscopic third ventriculostomy and examined the shunt complications and extra days in hospital required by these patients. A total of 150 new shunts was inserted during the two year period. Of these, 23 patients (15%) were judged suitable for endoscopic third ventriculostomy as an alternative to CSF shunting. Eight out of 23 patients required a total of 29 repeat operations and an extra 230 days in hospital due to shunt complications. Assuming an 80% success (shunt free) rate for endoscopic third ventriculostomy, we calculate that 9 operations and 74 bed days per year could be saved by using this technique. We conclude that in units undertaking a large number of CSF shunt insertions, investment in neuroendoscopic equipment, training, and expertise has the potential to release significant resources for other uses.

Key words

Hydrocephalus - Third ventriculostomy - Shunt complications - Health care resources