ABSTRACT
As routine outpatient neuroimaging became available more than 20 years ago, controversy
arose over appropriate selection of patients for computed tomography studies and subsequently
magnetic resonance imaging studies. Nowhere is this more apparent than in headache.
Because headache is a truly ubiquitous condition with a lifetime prevalence rate reaching
90%, it is clear we cannot scan all patients with headache. Review of the pertinent
literature, expert consensus, and a Practice Parameter issued by the American Academy
of Neurology all suggest that routine neuroimaging is not necessary in patients with
migraine headaches as defined by the International Headache Society criteria. The
literature would also support the belief that imaging is not necessary in patients
with typical recurrent cluster headaches. However, patients with new-onset headaches,
headaches with a progressive course, headaches with a significant change in pattern,
headaches that never alternate sides, and headaches associated with any neurologic
findings or seizures have a substantially higher likelihood of a secondary cause such
as tumor, arteriovenous malformation, or other structural lesion. In these situations,
imaging must be considered as part of the workup. Unfortunately, the literature does
not provide enough data to make any statistically predictive observations in patients
with headaches other than migraine or cluster headache with symptoms but no findings
on neurologic examination.
Keywords
migraine - headache - cluster headache - MRI - CT - arteriovenous malformation - neoplasm
- diagnosis
