Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery May Reduce the Incidence of Stroke in Patients with Significant Left Main Stem Disease

Abstract

Background: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with left main stem (LMS) disease remains controversial. This meta-analysis compares early outcomes of OPCAB surgery with on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) surgery in patients with significant LMS disease, focusing on the outcomes stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods: This is a meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative peer-reviewed publications sourced from a systematic search of Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Google Scholar and CINAHL (1965 – 2007). A random effects model was used and heterogeneity was assessed. Results: Nine studies (4411 patients) dating from 2000 – 2007, of whom 1036 (23.5 %) underwent OPCAB and 3375 (76.5 %) ONCAB, were included. The incidence of stroke was lower in the OPCAB group (OR 0.17 [95 % CI 0.05 to 0.60]). Early mortality, length of hospital stay, blood loss and inotropic requirements were significantly favored by OPCAB surgery. Conclusions: OPCAB may offer a neurological benefit in patients with significant LMS disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

cardiovascular surgery - coronary bypass surgery - myocardial protection

References

• 1 Bridgewater B, Neve H, Moat N. et al . Predicting operative risk for coronary artery surgery in the United Kingdom: a comparison of various risk prediction algorithms.  Heart. 1998;  79 350-355
• 2 The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group . Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina.  N Engl J Med. 1984;  311 1333-1339
• 3 Caracciolo E A, Davis K B, Sopko G. et al . Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience.  Circulation. 1995;  91 2325-2334
• 4 Eagle K A, Guyton R A, Davidoff R. et al . ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to update the 1999 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery).  Circulation. 2004;  110 e340-e437
• 5 Noyez L, van Son J A, van der Werf T. et al . Retrograde versus antegrade delivery of cardioplegic solution in myocardial revascularization. A clinical trial in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent myocardial revascularization with extensive use of the internal mammary artery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;  105 854-863
• 6 Kallikazaros I, Tsioufis C, Sideris S. et al . Carotid artery disease as a marker for the presence of severe coronary artery disease in patients evaluated for chest pain.  Stroke. 1999;  30 1002-1007
• 7 Stroup D F, Berlin J A, Morton S C. et al . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.  JAMA. 2000;  283 2008-2012
• 8 Wells G A, O'Connell D, Petersen P. et al .The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. Oxford: 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews; beyond the basics 2000
• 9 Ascione R, Reeves B C, Chamberlain M H. et al . Predictors of stroke in the modern era of coronary artery bypass grafting: a case control study.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 474-480
• 10 Kouchoukos N T, Oberman A, Kirklin J W, Russell Jr R O, Karp R B, Pacifico A D. et al . Coronary bypass surgery: analysis of factors affecting hospital mortality.  Circulation. 1980;  62 I84-I89
• 11 Panesar S S, Athanasiou T, Nair S. et al . Early outcomes in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 4921 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting – comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques.  Heart. 2006;  92 1808-1816
• 12 Brann S, Martineau R, Cartier R. Left main coronary artery stenosis: early experience with surgical revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass.  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000;  41 175-179
• 13 Cartier R, Brann S, Martineau R, Couturier A. Left main coronary artery stenosis and revascularization in the beating heart. Short- and long-term experience.  Ann Chir. 1999;  53 701-705
• 14 Dewey T M, Magee M J, Edgerton J R. et al . Off-pump bypass grafting is safe in patients with left main coronary disease.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 788-791
• 15 Fukushima S, Kobayashi J, Tagusari O. et al . Rationale of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for left main trunk disease.  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  52 560-566
• 16 Kerendi F, Puskas J D, Craver J M. et al . Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed safely without cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  79 801-806
• 17 Lu J C, Grayson A D, Pullan D M. On-pump versus off-pump surgical revascularization for left main stem stenosis: risk adjusted outcomes.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  80 136-142
• 18 Meharwal Z S, Mishra Y K, Kohli V. et al . Off-pump multivessel coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 S1353-S1357
• 19 Meharwal Z S, Trehan N. Is off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery safe for left main coronary artery stenosis?.  Indian Heart J. 2001;  53 314-318
• 20 Mujanovic E, Bergsland J, Hadziselimovic M. et al . Beating heart surgery in the treatment of stenoses of the main branch of the left coronary artery.  Med Arh. 2004;  58 25-26
• 21 Saba D, Ener S, Bicer M. et al . Off-pump bypass grafting in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis.  Heart Vessels. 2004;  19 8-12
• 22 Virani S S, Lombardi P, Tehrani H. et al . Off-pump coronary artery grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease.  J Card Surg. 2005;  20 537-541
• 23 Yeatman M, Caputo M, Ascione R. et al . Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;  19 239-244
• 24 Yu H Y, Wu I H, Chen Y S. et al . Comparison of outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and conventional coronary artery bypass surgery.  J Formos Med Assoc. 2003;  102 556-562
• 25 Angelini G D, Taylor F C, Reeves B C. et al . Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials.  Lancet. 2002;  359 1194-1199
• 26 Gerola L R, Buffolo E, Jasbik W. et al . Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in low-risk patients with one or two vessel disease: perioperative results in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  77 569-573
• 27 Lingaas P S, Hol P K, Lundblad R. et al . Clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized trial.  Heart Surg Forum. 2004;  7 37-41
• 28 van Dijk D, Nierich A P, Eefting F. et al . The Octopus Study: rationale and design of two randomized trials on medical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery on the beating heart.  Control Clin Trials. 2000;  21 595-609
• 29 Khan N E, De Souza A, Mister R. et al . A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  350 21-28
• 30 Puskas J D, Williams W H, Mahoney E M. et al . Off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial.  JAMA. 2004;  291 1841-1849
• 31 Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A. et al . Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  76 778-782
• 32 Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K. et al . Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE‐4.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  77 789-793
• 33 Sedrakyan A, Wu A W, Parashar A. et al . Off-pump surgery is associated with reduced occurrence of stroke and other morbidity as compared with traditional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of systematically reviewed trials.  Stroke. 2006;  37 2759-2769
• 34 Kallikazaros I, Tsioufis C, Sideris S. et al . Carotid artery disease as a marker for the presence of severe coronary artery disease in patients evaluated for chest pain.  Stroke. 1999;  30 1002-1007
• 35 Kim K B, Kang C H, Chang W I. et al . Off-pump coronary artery bypass with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 S1377-S1382
• 36 Abu-Omar Y, Cader S, Guerrieri W L. et al . Short-term changes in cerebral activity in on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery defined by functional magnetic resonance imaging and their relationship to microembolization.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  132 1119-1125
• 37 Czerny M, Baumer H, Kilo J. et al . Inflammatory response and myocardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;  17 737-742
• 38 Moon M R, Sundt T MIII, Pasque M K. et al . Influence of internal mammary artery grafting and completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome in octogenarians.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 2003-2007
• 39 Athanasiou T, Al Ruzzeh S, Kumar P. et al . Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  77 745-753
• 40 Jin R, Hiratzka L F, Grunkemeier G L. et al . Aborted off-pump coronary artery bypass patients have much worse outcomes than on-pump or successful off-pump patients.  Circulation. 2005;  112 I332-I337
• 41 Reeves B C, Ascione R, Caputo M. et al . Morbidity and mortality following acute conversion from off-pump to on-pump coronary surgery.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;  29 941-947