Download PDF
Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46(11): 1298-1330
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027850
Leitlinie

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

S3-Leitlinie „Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie” 2008 (AWMF-Register-Nr. 021 / 014)

S3-Guidelines – Sedation in Gastrointestinal EndoscopyA. Riphaus1 , T. Wehrmann1 , B. Weber1 , J. Arnold1 , U. Beilenhoff1 , H. Bitter1 , S von Delius1 , D. Domagk1 , A. F. Ehlers1 , S. Faiss1 , D. Hartmann1 , W. Heinrichs1 , M.-L Hermans1 , C. Hofmann1 , S. In der Smitten1 , M. Jung1 , G. Kähler1 , M. Kraus1 , J. Martin1 , A. Meining1 , J. Radke1 , T. Rösch1 , H. Seifert1 , A. Sieg1 , B. Wigginghaus1 , I. Kopp1
  • 1Die Institutsangaben sind in [Tab. 1] des Beitrages gelistet.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 November 2008 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Herausgeber der Leitlinie ist die Sektion Endoskopie im Auftrag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselerkrankungen e. V. (DGVS), die auch die federführende Fachgesellschaft ist. Mitherausgeber sind die an der Leitlinienentwicklung beteiligten Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen:

Bundesverband Niedergelassener Gastroenterologen Deuschlands e. V. (Bng) Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Endoskopie und Sonographie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV) Deutsche Morbus Crohn/Colitis ulcerosa Vereinigung e. V. (DCCV) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoskopie-Assistenzpersonal (DEGEA) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) Gesellschaft für Recht und Politik im Gesundheitswesen (GPRG)

Unter der Leitung von: T. Wehrmann, A. Riphaus, I. Kopp

Literatur

  • 1 Daneshmend T K, Bell G D, Logan R F. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey.  Gut. 1991;  32 12-15
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Keefe E B, O’Connor K W. ASGE survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 13-18
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Fried M. Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 231-234
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Frühmorgen P, Kriel L. Guidelines of the German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases. Guidelines for endoscopic colorectal polypectomy with the sling. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases.  Gastroenterol. 1998;  36 117-119
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T. Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie in Deutschland.  Z-Gastroenterol. 2007;  45 782
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 240-243
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Patterson K W, Casey P B, Murray J P. et al . Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with midazolam.  Br J Anaesth. 1991;  67 108-111
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Riphaus A, Gstettenbauer T, Frenz M B. et al . Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: a randomized and controlled study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 677-683
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Clinical Practice Guidelines: Safety and Sedation During Endoscopic Procedures.  Gut. 2003;  , http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/sedation.doc
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Stufe 1 Leitlinie Sedierung und Analgesie (Analgosedierung) von Patienten durch Nicht-Anästhesisten.  2008;  , http://www.dgai.de/ 06pdf/ 13_573-Leitlinie.pdf, http://intranet/awmf11 / 001 – 011.htm
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Hofmann C, Jung M. Sedierung und Überwachung bei endoskopischen Eingriffen.  2003;  , http://www.dgvs.de/media/ 1.2.Sedierung-ueberwachung.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Kulling D, Rothenbuhler R, Inauen W. Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 679-682
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Heuss L T, Drewe J, Schnieper P. et al . Patient-controlled versus nurse-administered sedation with propofol during colonoscopy. A prospective randomized trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 511-518
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J. et al . Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 664-671
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Rex D K, Heuss L T, Walker J A. et al . Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  129 1384-1391
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Rex D K, Overley C, Kinser K. et al . Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1159-1163
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Walker J A, McIntyre R D, Schleinitz P F. et al . Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1744-1750
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Tohda G, Higashi S, Wakahara S. et al . Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: safe and effective administration by registered nurses supervised by endoscopists.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 360-367
    Google Scholar
  • 19 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force . Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesis by non-anesthesiologists: an updated report by the American Society of Anestesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non- Anesthesiologists.  Anesthesiology. 2002;  96 1004-1017
    Google Scholar
  • 20 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003;  58 317-322
    Google Scholar
  • 21 American Society of Anesthesiologist. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care.  Anesthesiology. 2002;  96 742-752
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Joint statement of a Working from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), the American Gastroenterological (AGA), and the American Society for Gastrointestina Endoscopy (ASGE) . Recommendations on the administration of sedation for the performance of endoscopic procedures.  2006;  , www.gi.org/physicians/nataffairs/trisociety.asp
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Schreiber F. Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OGGH) – guidelines on sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 259-262
    Google Scholar
  • 24 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for training in patient monitoring and sedation and analgesia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 (6) 669-671
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Waring J P, Baron T H, Hirota W K. et al . Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 317-322
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Probert C S, Jayanthi V, Quinn J. et al . Information requirements and sedation preferences of patients undergoing endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 218-219
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Rex D K, Imperiale T F, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 554-559
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Eckardt V F, Kanzler G, Schmitt T. et al . Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 560-565
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Yoruk G, Aksoz K, Unsal B. et al . Colonoscopy without sedation.  Turk J Gastroenterol. 2003;  14 59-63
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Early D S, Saifuddin T, Johnson J C. et al . Patient attitudes toward undergoing colonoscopy without sedation.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 1862-1865
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Cohen L B, Wecsler J S, Gaetano J N. et al . Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 967-974
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Thompson D G, Lennard-Jones J E, Evans S J. et al . Patients appreciate premedication for endoscopy.  Lancet. 1980;  2 469-470
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Dillon M, Brown S, Casey W. et al . Colonoscopy under general anesthesia in children.  Pediatrics. 1998;  102 381-383
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Ely E W. et al . Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score (RASS).  JAMA. 2003;  289 2983-2991
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Cohen L B, Delegge M H, Aisenberg J. et al . AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 675-701
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Dripps R D, Lamont A, Eckenhoff J E. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality.  JAMA. 1961;  178 261-266
    Google Scholar
  • 37 American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists.  Anesthesiology. 1996;  84 459-471
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates. SGNA position statement: Statement on the use of sedation and analgesia in the gastrointestinal endoscopy setting.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003;  26 209-211
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates. SGNA position statement. Statement on the use of sedation and analgesia in the gastrointestinal endoscopy setting.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 2004;  27 142-144
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Faigel D O, Baron T H, Goldstein J L. et al . Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 613-617
    Google Scholar
  • 41 American Society for gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Sedation and monitoring of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1995;  42 626-629
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin Airway management.  AWMF. 2004;  45 302-306
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Koch D G, Arguedas M R, Fallon M B. Risk of aspiration pneumonia in suspected variceal hemorrhage: the value of prophylactic endotracheal intubation prior to endoscopy.  Dig Dis Sci. 2007;  52 2225-2228
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Rudolph S J, Landsverk B K, Freeman M L. Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 58-61
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. Vereinbarung des Berufsverbandes Deutscher Anästhesisten und des Berufverbandes der Deutschen Chirurgen. Verantwortung für die prä-, intra- und postoperative Lagerung des Patienten.  Anästh Intensivmed. 1987;  AWMF 65.41
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Olithselvan A, McIntyre A S, Gorard D A. Are patients’ sedation preferences at gastroscopy influenced by preceding patients’ decisions?.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;  20 989-992
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A. et al . Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  11 201-204
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Subramanian S, Liangpunsakul S, Rex D K. Preprocedure patient values regarding sedation for colonoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;  39 516-519
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Abraham N S, Fallone C A, Mayrand S. et al . Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  9 1692-1699
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Hedenbro J L, Ekelund M, Aberg T. et al . Oral sedation for diagnostic upper endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 8-10
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Kinoshita Y, Ishido S, Nishiyama K. et al . Arterial oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and pulse rate during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy – influence of sedation and age.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991;  13 656-660
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Yuno K, Iishi H, Tatsuta M. et al . Intravenous midazolam as a sedative for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996;  10 981-984
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Marriott P, Laasch H U, Wilbraham L. et al . Conscious sedation for endoscopic and non-endoscopic interventional gastrointestinal procedures: meeting patients’ expectations, missing the standard.  Clin Radiol. 2004;  59 180-185
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M. et al . Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 566-572
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Walmsley R S, Montgomery S M. Factors affecting patient tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;  26 253-255
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Roseveare C, Seavell C, Patel P. et al . Patient-controlled sedation and analgesia, using propofol and alfentanil, during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 768-773
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Ulmer B J, Hansen J J, Overley C A. et al . Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  1 425-432
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Vargo J J, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot J A. et al . Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  123 373-375
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Sipe B W, Rex D K, Latinovich D. et al . Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 815-825
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Weston B R, Chadalawada V, Chalasani N. et al . Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 2440-2447
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Mui L M, Teoh A Y, Ng E K. et al . Premedication with orally administered midazolam in adults undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 195-200
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Delius von S, Hollweck R, Schmid R M. et al . Midazolam-pain, but one cannot remember it: a survey among Southern German endoscopists.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  19 465-470
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Laluna L, Allen M L, Dimarino A J. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine, and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 289-293
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Ng J M, Kong C F, Nyam Jr D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 8-13
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Patel S, Vargo J J, Khandwala F. et al . Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2689-2695
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R. et al . Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 233-238
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Wehrmann T, Kokabpick H, Jacobi V. et al . Long-term results of endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin in elderly achalasic patients with tortuous megaesophagus or epiphrenic diverticulum.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 352-358
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. et al . Propofol for sedation in gastroscopy – a randomized comparison with midazolam.  Z Gastroenterol. 1999;  37 589-595
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus E P. et al . Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 1476-1479
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Reimann F M, Samson U, Derad I. et al . Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 239-244
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J. et al . Conscious sedation with propofol in elderly patients: a prospective evaluation.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  17 1493-1501
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Kazama T, Takeuchi K, Ikeda K. et al . Optimal propofol plasma concentration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients.  Anesthesiology. 2000;  93 662-669
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Rex D K, Overley C A, Walker J. Registered nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: Why? When? How?.  Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2003;  3 70-80
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Gottschling S, Larsen R, Meyer S. et al . Acute pancreatitis induced by short-term propofol administration.  Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;  15 1006-1008
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Jawaid Q, Presti M E, Neuschwander-Tetri B A. et al . Acute pancreatitis after single-dose exposure to propofol: a case report and review of literature.  Dig Dis Sci. 2002;  47 614-618
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Fodale V, La Monaca E. Propofol infusion syndrome: an overview of a perplexing disease.  Drug Saf. 2008;  31 293-303
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Kulling D, Fantin A C, Biro P. et al . Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Bright E, Roseveare C, Dalgleish D. et al . Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 683-687
    Google Scholar
  • 79 Lee D W, Chan A C, Sze T S. et al . Patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 629-632
    Google Scholar
  • 80 Crepeau T, Poincloux L, Bonny C. et al . Significance of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy. Results from a prospective randomized controlled study.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005;  29 1090-1096
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Lee D W, Chan A C, Wong S K. et al . The safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy:prospective study.  Hong Kong Med J. 2004;  10 84-88
    Google Scholar
  • 82 Egan T D, Kern S E, Johnson K B. et al . The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in a modified cyclodextrin formulation (Captisol) versus propofol in a lipid formulation (Diprivan): an electroencephalographic and hemodynamic study in a porcine model.  Anesth Analg. 2003;  97 72-79
    Google Scholar
  • 83 Fanti L, Agostoni M, Arcidiacono P G. et al . Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol. A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial.  Dig Liver Dis. 2007;  39 81-86
    Google Scholar
  • 84 Leslie K, Absalom A, Kenny G N. Closed loop control of sedation for colonoscopy using the Bispectral Index.  Anaesthesia. 2002;  57 693-697
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Campbell L, Imrie G, Doherty P. et al . Patient maintained sedation for colonoscopy using a target controlled infusion of propofol.  Anaesthesia. 2004;  59 127-132
    Google Scholar
  • 86 Gillham M J, Hutchinson R C, Carter R. et al . Patient-maintained sedation for ERCP with a target-controlled infusion of propofol: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 14-17
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Stonell C A, Leslie K, Absalom A R. Effect-site targeted patient-controlled sedation with propofol: comparison with anaesthetist administration for colonoscopy.  Anaesthesia. 2006;  61 240-247
    Google Scholar
  • 88 Pambianco J, Meroric J, Martin R. Feasibility assesment of computer assisted personalized sedation: a sedation delivery system to administer propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006;  63 (5) AB 189
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Reves J G, Fragen R J, Vinik H R. et al . Midazolam: pharmacology and uses.  Anesthesiology. 1985;  62 310-324
    Google Scholar
  • 90 Donnelly M B, Scott W A, Daly D S. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of alfentanil-midazolam and meperidine-diazepam.  Can J Anaesth. 1994;  41 1161-1165
    Google Scholar
  • 91 Ginsberg G G, Lewis J H, Gallagher J E. et al . Diazepam versus midazolam for colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of predicted versus actual dosing requirements.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 651-656
    Google Scholar
  • 92 Macken E, Gevers A M, Hendrickx A. et al . Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 57-61
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Lavies N G, Creasy T, Harris K. et al . Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: influence of sedation and operator experience.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;  83 618-622
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Carrougher J G, Kadakia S, Shaffer R T. et al . Venous complications of midazolam versus diazepam.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 396-399
    Google Scholar
  • 95 Ladas S D, Aabakken L, Rey J F. et al . Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members.  Digestion. 2006;  74 69-77
    Google Scholar
  • 96 Zakko S F, Seifert H A, Gross J B. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation during colonoscopy in a prospective double-blind study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 684-689
    Google Scholar
  • 97 Cantor D S, Baldridge E T. Premedication with meperidine and diazepam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy precludes the need for topical anesthesia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 339-341
    Google Scholar
  • 98 Lee M G, Hanna W, Harding H. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 82-84
    Google Scholar
  • 99 Lader M, Morton S. Benzodiazepine problems.  Br J Addict. 1991;  86 823-828
    Google Scholar
  • 100 Christe C, Janssens J P, Armenian B. et al . Midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in older persons: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;  48 1398-1403
    Google Scholar
  • 101 Froehlich F, Schwizer W, Thorens J. et al . Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastroenterology. 1995;  108 697-704
    Google Scholar
  • 102 Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W. et al . Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 1-9
    Google Scholar
  • 103 Yano H, Iishi H, Tatsuta M. et al . Oxygen desaturation during sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;  45 2138-2141
    Google Scholar
  • 104 Hirsh I, Vaissler A, Chernin J. et al . Fentanyl or tramadol, with midazolam, for outpatient colonoscopy: analgesia, sedation, and safety.  Dig Dis Sci. 2006;  51 1946-1951
    Google Scholar
  • 105 Lee S Y, Son H J, Lee J M. et al . Identification of factors that influence conscious sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy.  J Korean Med Sci. 2004;  19 536-540
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Morrow J B, Zuccaro Jr G, Conwell D L. et al . Sedation for colonoscopy using a single bolus is safe, effective, and efficient: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2242-2247
    Google Scholar
  • 107 Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F. et al . Routine versus „on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 169-174
    Google Scholar
  • 108 Kankaria A, Lewis J H, Ginsberg G. et al . Flumazenil reversal of psychomotor impairment due to midazolam or diazepam for conscious sedation for upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 416-421
    Google Scholar
  • 109 Saletin M, Malchow H, Muhlhofer H. et al . A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effects of flumazenil after midazolam premedication in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 331-333
    Google Scholar
  • 110 Mora C T, Torjman M, White P F. Sedative and ventilatory effects of midazolam infusion: effect of flumazenil reversal.  Can J Anaesth. 1995;  42 677-684
    Google Scholar
  • 111 Carter A S, Bell G D, Coady T. et al . Speed of reversal of midazolam-induced respiratory depression by flumazenil – a study in patients undergoing upper G.I.endoscopy.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990;  Suppl 92 59-64
    Google Scholar
  • 112 Andrews P J, Wright D J, Lamont M C. Flumazenil in the outpatient. A study following midazolam as sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Anaesthesia. 1990;  45 445-448
    Google Scholar
  • 113 Bartelsman J F, Sars P R, Tytgat G N. Flumazenil used for reversal of midazolam-induced sedation in endoscopy outpatients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 S9-S12
    Google Scholar
  • 114 Norton A C, Dundas C R. Induction agents for day-case anaesthesia. A double- blind comparison of propofol and midazolam antagonised by flumazenil.  Anaesthesia. 1990;  45 198-203
    Google Scholar
  • 115 Wehrmann T, Grotkamp J, Stergiou N. et al . Electroencephalogram monitoring facilitates sedation with propofol for routine ERCP: a randomized, controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 817-824
    Google Scholar
  • 116 Meining A, Semmler V, Kassem A M. et al . The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 345-349
    Google Scholar
  • 117 Hansen J J, Ulmer B J, Rex D K. Technical performance of colonoscopy in patients sedated with nurse-administered propofol.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 52-56
    Google Scholar
  • 118 Rudner R, Jalowiecki P, Kawecki P. et al . Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 657-663
    Google Scholar
  • 119 Qadeer M A, Vargo J J, Khandwala F. et al . Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 1049-1056
    Google Scholar
  • 120 Krugliak P, Ziff B, Rusabrov Y. et al . Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation guided by processed EEG during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 677-682
    Google Scholar
  • 121 Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 1957-1963
    Google Scholar
  • 122 Wehrmann T, Riphaus A. Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopic procedures: A risk factor analysis.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;  10 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 123 Ishiguro T, Ishiguro C, Ishiguro G. et al . Midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison between the states of patients in partial and complete amnesia.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 438-440
    Google Scholar
  • 124 Arrowsmith J B, Gerstman B B, Fleischer D E. et al . Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 421-427
    Google Scholar
  • 125 Basu S, Krishnamurthy B, Walsh T H. Value of fentanyl in flexible sigmoidoscopy.  World J Surg. 2004;  28 930-934
    Google Scholar
  • 126 Ishido S, Kinoshita Y, Kitajima N. et al . Fentanyl for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 689-692
    Google Scholar
  • 127 Akcaboy Z N, Akcaboy E Y, Albayrak D. et al . Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care?.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;  50 736-741
    Google Scholar
  • 128 Green S M, Li J. Ketamine in adults: what emergency physicians need to know about patient selection and emergence reactions.  Acad Emerg Med. 2000;  7 278-281
    Google Scholar
  • 129 White P F, Way W L, Trevor A J. Ketamine – its pharmacology and therapeutic uses.  Anesthesiology. 1982;  56 119-136
    Google Scholar
  • 130 Aggarwal A, Ganguly S, Anand V K. et al . Efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine for sedation and analgesia during pediatric endoscopic procedures.  Indian Pediatr. 1998;  35 1211-1214
    Google Scholar
  • 131 Gilger M A, Spearman R S, Dietrich C L. et al . Safety and effectiveness of ketamine as a sedative agent for pediatric GI endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 659-663
    Google Scholar
  • 132 Rosing C, Trinkl W, Rosing K. et al . Midazolam plus ketamine as premedication for colonoscopies. A double-blind, randomized study.  Med Klin. 1991;  86 190-193
    Google Scholar
  • 133 Ong W C, Santosh D, Lakhtakia S. et al . A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and pentazocine „sedato-analgesic cocktail” for sedation during ERCP.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 807-812
    Google Scholar
  • 134 Saunders B P, Fukumoto M, Halligan S. et al . Patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation provides effective sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 418-421
    Google Scholar
  • 135 Forbes G M, Collins B J. Nitrous oxide for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 271-277
    Google Scholar
  • 136 Maslekar S K, Hughes M, Skinn E. et al . Randomised controlled trial of sedation for colonoscopy:entonox versus intravenous sedation.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006;  63 (5) AB97-AB 97 S
    Google Scholar
  • 137 Mui W L, Kwong W H, Li A C. et al . Premedication with intravenous ketorolac trometamol (Toradol) in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2669-2673
    Google Scholar
  • 138 Lieberman D A, Wuerker C K, Katon R M. Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation.  Gastroenterology. 1985;  88 468-472
    Google Scholar
  • 139 Mizuno J, Matsuki M, Gouda Y. et al . Sedation with intravenous midazolam during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy – changes in hemodynamics, oxygen saturation and memory.  Masui. 2003;  52 976-980
    Google Scholar
  • 140 Oei-Lim V L, Kalkman C J, Makkes P C. et al . Patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients.  Anesth Analg. 1998;  86 967-972
    Google Scholar
  • 141 Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Heikkinen M. et al . Sedation, topical pharyngeal anesthesia and cardiorespiratory safety during gastroscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  40 899-905
    Google Scholar
  • 142 Boldy D A, Lever L R, Unwin P R. et al . Sedation for endoscopy: midazolam or diazepam and pethidine?.  Br J Anaesth. 1988;  61 698-701
    Google Scholar
  • 143 Milligan K R, Howe J P, McLoughlin J. et al . Midazolam sedation for outpatient fibreoptic endoscopy: evaluation of alfentanil supplementation.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988;  70 304-306
    Google Scholar
  • 144 Radaelli F, Meucci G, Terruzzi V. et al . Single bolus of midazolam versus bolus midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double- blind trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 329-335
    Google Scholar
  • 145 Paspatis G A, Manolaraki M, Xirouchakis G. et al . Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1963-1967
    Google Scholar
  • 146 Seifert H, Schmitt T H, Gultekin T. et al . Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  14 1207-1214
    Google Scholar
  • 147 DiPalma J A, Herrera J L, Weis F R. et al . Alfentanil for conscious sedation during colonoscopy.  South Med J. 1995;  88 630-634
    Google Scholar
  • 148 Moerman A T, Struys M M, Vereecke H E. et al . Remifentanil used to supplement propofol does not improve quality of sedation during spontaneous respiration.  J Clin Anesth. 2004;  16 237-243
    Google Scholar
  • 149 Rembacken B J, Axon A T. The role of pethidine in sedation for colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 244-247
    Google Scholar
  • 150 VanNatta M E, Rex D K. Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2209-2217
    Google Scholar
  • 151 Cordruwisch W, Doroschko M, Wurbs D. Deep sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic interventions: safety and reliability of a combination of midazolam and propofol.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000;  125 619-622
    Google Scholar
  • 152 Mui L M, Ng E K, Chan K C. et al . Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intravenously administered hyoscine N-butyl bromide in patients undergoing colonoscopy with patient-controlled sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 22-27
    Google Scholar
  • 153 Vargo J J, Holub J L, Faigel D O. et al . Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  24 955-963
    Google Scholar
  • 154 Iber F L, Sutberry M, Gupta R. et al . Evaluation of complications during and after conscious sedation for endoscopy using pulse oximetry.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 620-625
    Google Scholar
  • 155 Thompson A M, Park K G, Kerr F. et al . Safety of fibreoptic endoscopy: analysis of cardiorespiratory events.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 1046-1049
    Google Scholar
  • 156 Assy N, Rosser B G, Grahame G R. et al . Risk of sedation for upper GI endoscopy exacerbating subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 690-694
    Google Scholar
  • 157 Vasudevan A E, Goh K L, Bulgiba A M. Impairment of psychomotor responses after conscious sedation in cirrhotic patients undergoing therapeutic upper GI endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1717-1721
    Google Scholar
  • 158 Muravchick S. Anesthesia for the geriatric patient.  Clinical Anesthesia. 2001;  1205-1216
    Google Scholar
  • 159 Qureshi W A, Zuckerman M J, Adler D G. et al . ASGE guideline: modifications in endoscopic practice for the elderly.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 566-569
    Google Scholar
  • 160 Darling E. Practical considerations in sedating the elderly.  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1997;  9 371-380
    Google Scholar
  • 161 Dhariwal A, Plevris J N, Lo N T. et al . Age, anemia, and obesity-associated oxygen desaturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 684-688
    Google Scholar
  • 162 Scholer S G, Schafer D F, Potter J F. The effect of age on the relative potency of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;  12 145-147
    Google Scholar
  • 163 Hamdy N A, Kennedy H J, Nicholl J. et al . Sedation for gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and Diazemuls in patients with and without cirrhosis.  Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;  22 643-647
    Google Scholar
  • 164 Riphaus A, Lechowicz I, Porth J. et al . Sedierung mit Propofol für endoskopische Interventionen bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose. Ein alternatives Verfahren, um die Exacerbation einer subklinischen hepatischen Encephalopathie zu verhindern. Eine randomisiert-kontrollierte Studie.  Z- Gastroenterol. 2007;  45 784
    Google Scholar
  • 165 Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J. et al . Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients-a prospective, controlled study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1751-1757
    Google Scholar
  • 166 Harikumar R, Raj M, Paul A. et al . Listening to music decreases need for sedative medication during colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.  Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006;  25 3-5
    Google Scholar
  • 167 Rudin D, Kiss A, Wetz R V. et al . Music in the endoscopy suite: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 507-510
    Google Scholar
  • 168 Aisenberg J, Cohen L B. Sedation in endoscopic practice.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006;  16 695-708
    Google Scholar
  • 169 American Medical Association. The use of pulse oximetry during conscious sedation. Council on Scientific Affairs.  JAMA. 1993;  270 1463-1468
    Google Scholar
  • 170 Conigliaro R, Rossi A. Implementation of sedation guidelines in clinical practice in Italy: results of a prospective longitudinal multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1137-1143
    Google Scholar
  • 171 Eisenbacher S, Heard L. Capnography in the gastroenterology lab.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 2005;  28 99-105
    Google Scholar
  • 172 Graber R G. Propofol in the endoscopy suite: an anesthesiologist’s perspective.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 803-806
    Google Scholar
  • 173 Harris J K, Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V. et al . Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: An EPAGE Study.  Dig Liver Dis. 2007;  39 678-689
    Google Scholar
  • 174 Jamieson J. Anesthesia and sedation in the endoscopy suite? (Influences and options).  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 1999;  12 417-423
    Google Scholar
  • 175 Kulling D, Orlandi M, Inauen W. Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: how much staff and monitoring are necessary?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 443-449
    Google Scholar
  • 176 Leslie K, Stonell C A. Anaesthesia and sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;  18 431-436
    Google Scholar
  • 177 Lopez R L. Subcomite de Protocolos Of The Spanish Society Of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Seed. Sedation/analgesia guidelines for endoscopy.  Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2006;  98 685-692
    Google Scholar
  • 178 Mahoney L B, Lightdale J R. Sedation of the Pediatric and Adolescent Patient for GI Procedures.  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007;  10 412-421
    Google Scholar
  • 179 Moos D D, Cuddeford J D. Methemoglobinemia and benzocaine.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 2007;  30 342-345
    Google Scholar
  • 180 Morlote E B, Zweng T N, Strodel W E. Hemodynamic monitoring and pulse oximetry during percutaneous gastrostomy and jejunostomy: necessity or nuisance?.  Surg Endosc. 1991;  5 130-134
    Google Scholar
  • 181 Overley C A, Rex D K. A nursing perspective on sedation and nurse-administered propofol for endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;  14 325-333
    Google Scholar
  • 182 Robbertze R, Posner K L, Domino K B. Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room.  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;  19 436-442
    Google Scholar
  • 183 Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates. Guidelines for nursing care of the patient receiving sedation and analgesia in the gastrointestinal endoscopy setting.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 1997;  20 (2) Suppl 1-6
    Google Scholar
  • 184 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Training guideline for use of propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 (2) 167-172
    Google Scholar
  • 185 Vargo J J, Ahmad A S, Aslanian H R. et al . Training in patient monitoring and sedation and analgesia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 7-10
    Google Scholar
  • 186 Zebris J, Maurer W. Quality assurance in the endoscopy suite: sedation and monitoring.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;  14 415-429
    Google Scholar
  • 187 Silvermann W, Chotiprasidhi R, Chuttani J. et al . Monitoring equipment for endoscopy.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003;  59 (7) 761-765
    Google Scholar
  • 188 Kiesslich R, Moenk S, Reinhardt K. et al . Combined simulation training: a new concept and workshop is useful for crisis management in gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 1031-1039
    Google Scholar
  • 189 Sieg A. Propofol sedation in outpatient colonoscopy by trained practice nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective evaluation of over 3000 cases.  Z Gastroenterol. 2007;  45 697-701
    Google Scholar
  • 190 Heuss L T, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 161-166
    Google Scholar
  • 191 Froehlich F, Harris J K, Wietlisbach V. et al . Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE).  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 461-469
    Google Scholar
  • 192 Anderson J L, Junkins E, Pribble C. et al . Capnography and depth of sedation during propofol sedation in children.  Ann Emerg Med. 2007;  49 9-13
    Google Scholar
  • 193 Levine D A, Platt S L. Novel monitoring techniques for use with procedural sedation.  Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;  17 351-354
    Google Scholar
  • 194 Soto R G, Fu E S, Vila Jr H. et al . Capnography accurately detects apnea during monitored anesthesia care.  Anesth Analg. 2004;  99 379-382, table
    Google Scholar
  • 195 Vargo J J, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot J A. et al . Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during therapeutic upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 826-831
    Google Scholar
  • 196 Koniaris L G, Wilson S, Drugas G. et al . Capnographic monitoring of ventilatory status during moderate (conscious) sedation.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 1261-1265
    Google Scholar
  • 197 Chen S C, Rex D K. An initial investigation of bispectral monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1081-1086
    Google Scholar
  • 198 Drake L M, Chen S C, Rex D K. Efficacy of bispectral monitoring as an adjunct to nurse-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2003-2007
    Google Scholar
  • 199 Parzreller M, Wenk M. Aufklärung und Einwilligung bei ärztlichen Eingriffen.  Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2007;  109 576-586
    Google Scholar
  • 200 Christopher J. Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Elderly Patient.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 590-595
    Google Scholar
  • 201 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Hahn E G. The use of simulators for training in GI endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 727-729
    Google Scholar
  • 202 Rieger H.-J. Zur Rechtzeitigkeit der Patientenaufklärung.  Dtsch Med Wochschr. 2003;  128 1728-1729
    Google Scholar
  • 203 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 620-627
    Google Scholar
  • 204 Mahajan R J, Johnson J C, Marshall J B. Predictors of patient cooperation during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;  24 220-223
    Google Scholar
  • 205 Pena L R, Mardini H E, Nickl N J. Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.  Dig Dis Sci. 2005;  50 1860-1871
    Google Scholar
  • 206 Lazzaroni M, Bianchi P G. Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 101-109
    Google Scholar
  • 207 Laufs A, Uhlenbruck W. Handbuch des Arztrechts. 2002 3. Aufl
    Google Scholar
  • 208 Med R 41 – 42. OLG Stuttgart 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 209 MedR407 – 408. OLG Zweibrücken 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 210 Hochberger J. Die Einverständniserklärung zu endoskopischen Eingriffen. Sauerbruch T, Scheurlen C Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) zur Durchführung endoskopischer Untersuchungen Stuttgart; Demter Verlag 2002 3. erweiterte und überarbeitete Aufl: 1-11
    Google Scholar
  • 211 Hayes A, Buffum M. Educating patients after conscious sedation for gastrointestinal procedures.  Gastroenterol Nurs. 2001;  24 54-57
    Google Scholar
  • 212 Smith M R, Bell G D, Fulton B. et al . A comparison of winged steel needles and Teflon cannulas in maintaining intravenous access during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 33-36
    Google Scholar
  • 213 Alcain G, Guillen P, Escolar A. et al . Predictive factors of oxygen desaturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in nonsedated patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 143-147
    Google Scholar
  • 214 Sieg A, Theilmeier A. Results of coloscopy screening in 2005 – an Internet-based documentation.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006;  131 379-383
    Google Scholar
  • 215 Jurell K R, O’Connor K W, Slack J. et al . Effect of supplemental oxygen on cardiopulmonary changes during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 665-670
    Google Scholar
  • 216 Reshef R, Shiller M, Kinberg R. et al . A prospective study evaluating the usefulness of continuous supplemental oxygen in various endoscopic procedures.  Isr J Med Sci. 1996;  32 736-740
    Google Scholar
  • 217 Wang C Y, Ling L C, Cardosa M S. et al . Hypoxia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with and without sedation and the effect of pre- oxygenation on oxygen saturation.  Anaesthesia. 2000;  55 654-658
    Google Scholar
  • 218 Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Mattila M. et al . Conscious sedation and cardiorespiratory safety during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 48-54
    Google Scholar
  • 219 Petelenz M, Gonciarz M, Macfarlane P. et al . Sympathovagal balance fluctuates during colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 508-514
    Google Scholar
  • 220 Bhalla A, Sood A, Sachdeva A. et al . Cardiorespiratory compromise under conscious sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006;  16 (9) 585-589
    Google Scholar
  • 221 Lewalter T. Notfall Herzrhythmusstörungen.  Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2007;  104 (17) 1172-1180
    Google Scholar
  • 222 Leslie K, Tay T, Neo E. Intravenous fluid to prevent hypotension in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.  Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;  34 316-321
    Google Scholar
  • 223 Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Laitinen T. et al . Effect of conscious sedation on cardiac autonomic regulation during colonoscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 990-996
    Google Scholar
  • 224 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Heisenbach T. How safe is premedication in ambulatory endoscopy in Germany.A prospective study in gastroenterology specialty practices.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000;  125 1288-1293
    Google Scholar
  • 225 Royal College of Surgeons of England Commission on the Provision of Surgical Services .Report of the working party on guidelines for sedation by non- anesthetists. 1993 www.rcseng.ac.uk/fds/clinical_guidelines-31k
    Google Scholar
  • 226 Aldrete J A. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited.  J Clin Anesth. 1995;  7 89-91
    Google Scholar
  • 227 Willey J, Vargo J J, Connor J T. et al . Quantitative assessment of psychomotor recovery after sedation and analgesia for outpatient EGD.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 810-816
    Google Scholar
  • 228 Nuotto E J, Korttila K T, Lichtor J L. et al . Sedation and recovery of psychomotor function after intravenous administration of various doses of midazolam and diazepam.  Anesth Analg. 1992;  74 265-271
    Google Scholar
  • 229 Thapar P, Zacny J P, Thompson W. et al . Using alcohol as a standard to assess the degree of impairment induced by sedative and analgesic drugs used in ambulatory surgery.  Anesthesiology. 1995;  82 53-59
    Google Scholar
  • 230 Korttila K, Linnoila M. Psychomotor skills related to driving after intramuscular administration of diazepam and meperidine.  Anesthesiology. 1975;  125 619-622
    Google Scholar
  • 231 Korttila K, Linnoila M. Recovery and skills related to driving after intravenous sedation: dose-response relationship with diazepam.  Br J Anaesth. 1975;  47 457-463
    Google Scholar
  • 232 Korttila K. Recovery after intravenous sedation. A comparison of clinical and paper and pencil tests used in assessing late effects of diazepam.  Anaesthesia. 1976;  31 724-731
    Google Scholar
  • 233 Piletti R, Davis P J, Redlinger R. et al . Effect on hospital wide sedation practice after Implentation of the 2001 JCAHO procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines.  Arch Adolsec Med. 2006;  160 211-216
    Google Scholar

Dr. Andrea Riphaus

Medizinische Klinik I, Klinikum Region Hannover GmbH, Krankenhaus Siloah

Roesebeckstr. 15

30449 Hannover

Phone: ++ 49/511/9 27 22 31

Fax: ++ 49/511/9 27 26 69

Email: ariphaus@web.de

Prof. Dr. Till Wehrmann

Fachbereich Gastroenterologie, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik

Aukammallee 33

65193 Wiesbaden

Phone: ++ 49/611/57 72 12

Fax: ++ 49/611/57 74 60

Email: till.wehrmann@dkd-wiesbaden.de

      >