Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Präinterventionelle Bestimmung des distalen Stenosegrades der extrakraniellen Arteria
carotis interna (ACI) durch Gefäßultraschall mittels farbkodierter Duplexsonografie
(FKDS) und B-Flow: Vergleich mit kontrastmittelverstärkter 64-Zeilen-CT-Angiografie
(CTA), kontrastverstärkter MR-Angiografie (ceMRA) und digitaler Subtraktionsangiografie
(DSA). Material und Methoden: Bei 21 Patienten mit symptomatischer ACI-Stenose wurde vor perkutaner stentgestützter
PTA eine komplementäre Diagnostik und Stenosenbeurteilung mittels FKDS, B-Flow, CTA,
ceMRA und DSA durchgeführt. Die Ultraschalldiagnostik erfolgte mit hochauflösenden
Linearschallköpfen (5 - 10 MHz und 9 - 14 MHz). Bei jedem Patienten wurden eine bolusgetriggerte
kontrastmittelverstärkte Mehrzeilen-CTA (Kollimation 64 × 0,5 mm) und eine ceMRA (1,5
Tesla) sowie eine selektive DSA durchgeführt. Es erfolgte die Bestimmung des distalen
Stenosegrades nach NASCET-Kriterien durch Mittelung aus jeweils 5 Einzelmessungen
pro Modalität und Patient. In der CTA und ceMRA wurden die Originalbilder (source
images) sowie MPR-Darstellungen und MIP-Rekonstruktionen beurteilt. Mit der FKDS wurden
hämodynamische Flussparameter bestimmt. Die Auswertung erfolgte durch zwei erfahrene
Radiologen im Konsens. Ergebnisse: Die Stenosegraduierung reichte von 45 - 95 % und lag im Mittel bei 73 % (± 0,13).
Zu den Referenzwerten der DSA ergab sich ein hohes Maß an Übereinstimmung mit dem
B-Flow (r = 0,9379), der FKDS (r = 0,852), den Messwerten aus den Originaldatensatz
der MRA (r = 0,9117) und den Rekonstruktionen der CTA (r = 0,8598) im Pearson-Korrelationstest.
Schlussfolgerung: Eine komplementäre Diagnostik aus Gefäßultraschall und wahlweise der CTA und MRA
erhöht die diagnostische Sicherheit der Quantifizierung von ACI-Stenosen im Vergleich
mit der selektiven DSA.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the value of vascular ultrasound determining the pre-interventional degree
of distal stenosis in the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) by means of color-coded
duplex sonography (CCDS) and B-flow. Comparison with contrast-enhanced 64-line CT
angiography (CTA), contrast-enhanced MRA (ceMRA) and digital subtraction angiography
(DSA). Materials and Methods: Complementary diagnostics and evaluation of the stenosis by means of CCDS, B-flow,
CTA, ceMRA and DSA were performed prior to percutaneous stent-assisted PTA in 21 symptomatic
ICA stenosis. Ultrasound diagnostics were carried out with high-resolution linear
transducers (5 - 10 MHz and 9 - 14 MHz). A bolus-triggered contrast-enhanced multislice
CTA (collimation 64 × 0.5 mm) and a ceMRA (1.5 Tesla) as well as selective DSA were
performed in every patient. The degree of distal stenosis was established in accordance
to NASCET criteria by averaging 5 single measurements per modality and patient. The
source images as well as MPR and MIP reconstructions were evaluated in the CTA and
ceMRA. Hemodynamic flow parameters were determined with CCDS and B-flow. The images
were assessed by two experienced readers in consensus. Results: The extent of stenosis ranged from 45 to 95 %, averaging 73 % (± 13 %). There was
a high degree of agreement between the B-flow results (r = 0.938), the CCDS (r = 0.852),
the measurements from the source data of the ceMRA (r = 0.9117) and reconstructions
of the CTA (r = 0.8598) compared to quantitative DSA as a reference technique. Conclusion: Compared to selective DSA, vascular ultrasound in combination with CTA and ceMRA
increase the reliability of the diagnostic quantification of ICA stenosis.
Schlüsselwörter
B-Flow - CCDS - ceMRA - Multislice-CTA - DSA - ICA-stenosis
Key words
carotid arteries - angiography - ultrasound - CT angiography - MR angiography
Literatur
1
Arning C, Hammer E, Kortmann H. et al .
Quantifying stenosis of the internal carotid artery: which ultrasound criteria are
relevant?.
Ultraschall in Med.
2003;
24
233-238
2
Gaitini D, Soudack M.
Diagnosing carotid stenosis by Doppler sonography: state of the art.
J Ultrasound Med.
2005;
24
1127-1136
3
Neff K W, Kilian A K, Meairs S. et al .
Correlation of duplex sonographic stenosis grading by means of cross-sectional analysis
and MR-tomographic blood volume flow quantification in unilateral stenosis of the
internal carotid artery.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2005;
177
992-999
4
Arning C.
Perivascular tissue vibrations: a criterium for high-grade stenoses of the internal
carotid artery.
Ultraschall in Med.
2001;
22
62-65
5
Sabeti S, Schillinger M, Mlekusch W. et al .
Quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex US: comparative analysis
of different flow velocity criteria.
Radiology.
2004;
232
431-439
6
Hwang C S, Liao K M, Lee J H. et al .
Measurement of carotid stenosis: comparisons between duplex and different angiographic
grading methods.
J Neuroimaging.
2003;
13
133-139
7
Grant E G, Benson C B, Moneta G L. et al .
Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis - Society of Radiologists
in Ultrasound consensus conference.
Ultrasound Q.
2003;
19
190-198 Review
8
Horrow M M, Stassi J, Schurman A. et al .
The limitations of carotid sonography: interpretive and technology-related errors.
Am J Roentgenol.
2000;
174
189-194
9
Jung E M, Kubale K, Clevert D A. et al .
B-flow and contrast medium-enhanced power Doppler (Optison®) -preoperative diagnosis
of high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2002;
174
62-69
10
Jung E M, Kubale K, Clevert D A. et al .
B-flow and B-flow with 3D and SRI postprocessing before intervention and monitoring
after stenting of the internal carotid artery.
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation.
2007;
36
35-46
11
Jung E M, Kubale K, Clevert D A. et al .
B-flow and color-coded B-flow in sonographic diagnosis of filiform stenosis of the
internal carotid artery.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2003;
175
1251-1258
12
Jung E M, Kubale R, Ritter G. et al .
Diagnostics and characterisations of preocclusive stenosis and occlusions of the internal
carotid artery with B-flow.
European Radiology.
2007;
17
439-447
13
Wessels T, Harrer J U, Stetter S. et al .
Three-dimensional assessment of extracranial Doppler sonography in carotid artery
stenosis compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Stroke.
2004;
35
1847-1851
14
Harada K, Nakahara I, Tanaka M. et al .
Comparison of the findings of multislice CT and angiography after stenting for supraaortic
arteries.
No Shinkei Geka.
2004;
32
29-35
15
Lell M, Anders K, Leidecker C. et al .
CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types.
Radiologe.
2004;
44
967-974
16
Straube T, Wolf S, Flesser A. et al .
MRT bei Karotisstents: Einfluss von Stenteigenschaften und Geräteparametern auf die
Darstellung des Karotislumens. (MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties
and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen).
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2005;
177
375-380
17
Aschenbach R, Eger C, Basche S. et al .
Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance
angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses
over 70 % reliably detectable?.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2004;
176
357-362
18
Wardlaw J M, Lewis S C, Collie D A. et al .
Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid
stenosis - effect of observer experience.
Neuroradiology.
2002;
44
126-132
19
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail Collaborators .
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade
stenosis.
N Engl J Med.
1991;
325
445-452
20
Kubale R, Arning C.
Stellenwert der Doppler-sosgraphischen Verfahren zur Diagnose der Karotisstenose.
Radiologe.
2004;
44
946-959
21
Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloorse K. et al .
Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers
(ELOCAS Registry).
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino).
2005;
46
241-247
22
Bibl D, Lampl C, Biberhofer I. et al .
Internal carotid artery stent placement without emboli protection: results and long-term
outcome.
Neurology.
2005;
65
132-134
23
Vitek J J, Al-Mubarak N, Iyer S S. et al .
Carotid artery stent placement with distal balloon protection: technical considerations.
JNR Am J Neuroradiol.
2005;
26
854-861
24
MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trail (ACST) Collaborative Group .
Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endaterectomy in patients
without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial.
Lancet.
2004;
363
1491-1502
25
Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trail (ACST) Collaborative
Group. .
Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in
patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial.
Lancet.
2004;
364
416
26
Clevert D A, Rupp N, Reiser M. et al .
Improved diagnosis of vascular dissection by ultrasound B-flow: a comparison with
color-coded Doppler and power Doppler sonography.
Eur Radiol.
2005;
15
342-347
27
Bartlett E S, Walters T D, Symons S P. et al .
Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusing by using CT angiography.
Am J Neuroradiol.
2006;
27
632-637
28
Clevert D A, Johnson T, Michaely H.
High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution
contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
Eur J Radiol.
2006;
60
379-386
29
Wardlaw J M, Lewis S C, Collie D A. et al .
Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid
stenosis - effect of observer experience.
Neuroradiology.
2002;
44
868-869
30
Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R. et al .
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Intraindividual Correlations of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography,
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography, Conventional DSA, and Rotational Angiography for
Detection and Grading.
Radiology.
2005;
236
204-213
31
Clevert D A, Johnson T, Jung E M. et al .
Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis:
Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
online first
Dr. Thomas Finkenzeller
Institut für Röntgendiagnostik Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
F.J. Strauss-Allee 12
93053 Regensburg
Phone: ++ 49/9 41/9 44 74 22
Fax: ++ 49/9 41/9 44 74 09
Email: thomas.finkenzeller@klinik.uni-regensburg.de