Laparoscopy in Crohn's Disease

ABSTRACT

Crohn's disease represents a challenging operative dilemma. The nature of the disease increases the technical complexity of operations, their morbidity, and the likelihood of multiple operations. In this setting, the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, including shorter hospital stays, less adhesion formation, fewer wound complications, and faster recovery of bowel function, are particularly beneficial to the patient. Patients with Crohn's disease requiring operations in the elective and semi-elective setting can all be approached initially laparoscopically. The surgeon's skill set should include extensive experience in advanced laparoscopic bowel surgery as well as open management of Crohn's disease and its complications. Strict adherence to the basic tenet of bowel preservation is imperative. The operations most commonly performed for Crohn's disease include diagnostic laparoscopy, stricturoplasty, small bowel resection, ileocolic resection, colectomy, repair of fistulae, and gastrojejunostomy for bypass of gastric or duodenal disease. Postoperative management includes resumption of steroids, typically without the need for “stress-dosing,” bowel rest for a short period, and pain control, which is also less than that experienced with a laparotomy.

Laparoscopy - Crohn's disease - operative approach

REFERENCES

• 1 Wu J S, Birnbaum E H, Kodner I J, Fry R D, Read T E, Fleshman J W. Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resections in patients with Crohn's disease: are abscesses, phlegmons, or recurrent disease contraindications?.  Surgery. 1997;  122 682-688
• 2 Bemelman W A, Slors J F, Dunker M S et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a comparative study.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 721-725
• 3 Kishi D, Nezu R, Ito T et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for Crohn's disease: reduced surgical stress following ileocolectomy.  Surg Today. 2000;  30 219-222
• 4 Milsom J W, Hammerhofer K A, Bohm B, Marcello P, Elson P, Fazio V W. Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1-8
• 5 Benoist S, Panis Y, Beaufour A, Bouhnik Y, Matuchansky C, Valleur P. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection in Crohn's disease: a case-matched comparison with open resection.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 814-818
• 6 Duepree H J, Senagore A J, Delaney C P, Brady K M, Fazio V W. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 605-610
• 7 Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Arnaud J P. Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1129-1133
• 8 Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Okabayashi K, Hibi T, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 970-973
• 9 Shore G, Gonzalez Q H, Bondora A, Vickers S M. Laparoscopic vs. conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn disease.  Arch Surg. 2003;  138 76-79
• 10 Young-Fadok T M, Hall-Long K, McConnell E J, Gomez R G, Cabanela R L. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 450-454

SUGGESTED READINGS

• 11 Canin-Endres J, Salky B, Gattorno F, Edye M. Laparoscopic assisted intestinal resection in 88 patients with Crohn's disease.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 595-599
• 12 Casillas S, Delaney C P. Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.  Dig Surg. 2005;  22 135-142
• 13 Hanauer S B, Sandborn W. Mangement of Crohn's disease in adults.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96(3) 635-643
• 14 Noel J K, Fahrbach K, Estok R et al.. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures.  J Am Coll Surg. 2007;  204(2) 291-307
• 15 Reissman P, Salky B A, Edye M, Wexner S D. Laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease indications and results.  Surg Endosc. 1996;  10(12) 1201-1204
• 16 Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch H P. The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do predictive factors exist?.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 151-156