Download PDF
Semin Hear 2007; 28(4): 276-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-990715
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Secondary Treatment Benefits Achieved by Hearing-Impaired Tinnitus Patients Using Aided Environmental Sound Therapy for Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Comparisons with Matched Groups of Tinnitus Patients Using Noise Generators for Sound Therapy

Craig Formby1 , 2 , Michael L. Keaser1
  • 1The University of Maryland Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-HNS, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 16 S. Eutaw Street, Suite 500, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2Present address: College of Arts & Science, Engineering and Medicine, Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 October 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Tinnitus patients with hearing loss may use amplified environmental sound from hearing aids (HAs) for the sound therapy (ST) component of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT). Sizable secondary treatment benefits, namely, incremental shifts in loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) and expansion of the auditory dynamic range (DR) for loudness, have been reported for tinnitus patients who use noise generators (NGs) for ST in TRT. The primary questions addressed in this study are (1) Then hearing-impaired tinnitus patients using amplified environmental sound for their ST also achieve significant secondary treatment benefits and, if so, (2) are these secondary effects of similar magnitude to those measured for tinnitus patients using NGs for their ST? An analysis of patient records in the University of Maryland Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Center (UMTHC) revealed TRT treatment-related changes in the LDL averaged 2.70 dB for a group of 25 aided hearing-impaired tinnitus patients. Corresponding treatment effects for four matched groups of tinnitus patients, who used NGs for their ST, ranged from 5.91 to 10.10 dB. The associated incremental changes in the DR averaged 0.60 dB for the aided tinnitus patients and from 4.10 to 9.23 dB for the matched groups of tinnitus patients who used NGs for their ST. These findings indicate that hearing-impaired tinnitus patients using aided environmental sound for TRT achieve smaller secondary treatment benefits than do tinnitus patients who use NGs for their ST.

KEYWORDS

Secondary treatment benefits - hyperacusis - tinnitus - sound therapy - tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) - aided environmental sound - hearing aids

REFERENCES

  • 1 Tyler R S. Neurophysological models, psychological models, and treatments for tinnitus. In: Tyler RS Tinnitus Treatment: Clinical Protocols. New York; Thieme 2006: 1-22
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Jastreboff P J, Jastreboff M M. Decreased sound tolerance. In: Snow JB Jr Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Hamilton, Canada; BC Decker 2004: 8-15
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Gold S L, Formby C, Gray W C. Celebrating a decade of evaluation and treatment: the University of Maryland Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center.  Am J Audiol. 2000;  9 69-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sheldrake J B, Jastreboff M M. Role of hearing aids in management of tinnitus. In: Snow JB Jr Tinnitus Theory and Management. Hamilton, Canada; BC Decker 2004: 310-313
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Formby C, Gold S L, Keaser M L, Block K L, Hawley M L. Secondary benefits from tinnitus retraining therapy: clinically significant increases in loudness discomfort level and expansion of the auditory dynamic range.  Semin Hear. 2007;  28 227-260
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wölk C, Seefeld B. The effects of managing hyperacusis with maskers (noise generators). In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 512-514
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Jastreboff P J, Sheldrake J B, Jastreboff M M. Hyperacusis patients before and during tinnitus retraining therapy: audiometric categorization. Abstract presented at: the Twenty-Fifth International Congress of Audiology August 27-31, 2000 The Hague, Holland;
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Hazell J WP, Sheldrake J B, Graham R L. Decreased sound tolerance: predisposing factors, triggers, and outcomes after TRT. In: Putazzi R Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar 2002. Crawley, Australia; University of Western Australia 2002: 255-261
    Google Scholar
  • 9 McKinney C J, Hazell J WP, Graham R L. Changes in loudness discomfort level and sensitivity to environmental sound with habituation based therapy. In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 499-501
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Olsen S E, Rasmussen A N, Nielsen L H, Borgkvist B V. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use.  Audiology. 1999;  38 202-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Philibert B, Collet L, Vesson J-F, Veuillet E. Intensity-related performances are modified by long-term hearing aid use: a functional plasticity?.  Hear Res. 2002;  165 142-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Berry J A, Gold S L, Frederick E A, Gray W C, Staecker H. Patient-based outcomes in patients with primary tinnitus undergoing tinnitus retraining therapy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;  128 1153-1157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jastreboff P J, Jastreboff M M. Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) as a method for treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis patients.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;  11 162-177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jastreboff P J, Jastreboff M M. Tinnitus retraining therapy. In: Snow JB Jr Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Hamilton, Canada; BC Decker 2004: 295-309
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys .1983 General Household Survey. The prevalence of tinnitus 1981 (GHS83/1). London, UK; Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Saltzman M, Ersner M S. A hearing aid for the relief of tinnitus aurium.  Laryngoscope. 1947;  57 358-366
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Goodhill V. The management of tinnitus.  Laryngoscope. 1950;  60 442-450
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Surr R K, Kolb J A, Cord M T, Garrus N P. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;  10 489-495
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tyler R S, Bentler R A. Tinnitus maskers and hearing aids for tinnitus.  Semin Hear. 1987;  8(1) 49-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Searchfield G D. Hearing aids and tinnitus. In: Tyler RS Tinnitus Treatment: Clinical Protocols. New York; Thieme 2006: 161-175
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Sheldrake J B, Hazell J WP. Maskers versus hearing aids in the prosthetic management of tinnitus. In: Aran JM, Dauman R Tinnitus 91. Proceedings of the Fourth International Tinnitus Seminar. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Kugler 1992: 395-399
    Google Scholar
  • 22 von Wedel H, von Wedel U, Walger M. Tinnitus masking with tinnitus-maskers and hearing aids. In: Vernon J, Moller AR Mechanisms of Tinnitus. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1995: 187-192
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Melin L, Scott B, Lindberg P, Lyttkens L. Hearing aids and tinnitus - an experimental group study.  Br J Audiol. 1987;  21 91-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 McKinney C J, Hazell J WP, Graham R L. An evaluation of the TRT method. In: Hazell J Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London, UK; The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Centre 1999: 99-105
    Google Scholar

Craig FormbyPh.D. 

Dept. of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama

700 University Blvd., Rm 1451, Box 870242, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0242

Email: cformby@as.ua.edu

      >