Semin intervent Radiol 2007; 24(3): 346-349
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-985749
Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury during Translumbar Embolization of a Type II Endoleak

Charles T. Burke1
  • 1Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 September 2007 (online)

ABSTRACT

The persistence of flow within an aneurysm sac remains the so-called Achilles heel of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The management of type II endoleaks remains controversial, although aneurysm sac expansion is an accepted indication for intervention. The present case describes a patient with a type II endoleak following endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm treated by translumbar embolization. The procedure was complicated by iatrogenic injury to the left ureter and nontarget embolization resulting in acute ureteral obstruction.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Tolia A J, Landis R, Lamparello P et al.. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: natural history.  Radiology. 2005;  235 683-686
  • 2 Veith F J, Baum R A, Ohki T et al.. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference.  J Vasc Surg. 2002;  35 1029-1035
  • 3 Baum R A, Cope C, Fairman R M et al.. Translumbar embolization of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 111-116
  • 4 Haulon S, Tyazi A, Willoteaux S et al.. Embolization of type II endoleaks after aortic stent-graft implantation: technique and immediate results.  J Vasc Surg. 2001;  34 600-605
  • 5 Stavropoulos S W, Kim H, Clark T WI et al.. Embolization of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with use of cyanoacrylate with or without coils.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;  16 857-861
  • 6 Gelfand D V, White G H, Wilson S E. Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;  20 69-74
  • 7 Rhee S J, Ohki T, Veith F J et al.. Current status of management of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;  17 335-344
  • 8 Mousa A, Dayal R, Bernheim J et al.. A canine model to study the significance and hemodynamics of type II endoleaks.  J Surg Res. 2005;  123 275-283
  • 9 Baum R A, Carpenter J P, Cope C et al.. Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.  J Vasc Surg. 2001;  33 32-41
  • 10 Milner R, Ruurda J P, Blankensteijn J D. Durability and validity of a remote, miniaturized pressure sensor in an animal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm.  J Endovasc Ther. 2004;  11 372-377
  • 11 van Marrewijk C J, Fransen G, Laheij R JF et al.. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;  27 128-137
  • 12 van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris P L et al.. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience.  J Vasc Surg. 2002;  35 461-473
  • 13 Baum R A, Carpenter J P, Tuite C M et al.. Diagnosis and treatment of inferior mesenteric arterial endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.  Radiology. 2000;  215 409-413
  • 14 Solis M M, Ayerdi J, Babcock G A et al.. Mechanism of failure in the treatment of type II endoleak with percutaneous coil embolization.  J Vasc Surg. 2002;  36 485-491
  • 15 Baum R A, Carpenter J P, Golden M A et al.. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques.  J Vasc Surg. 2002;  35 23-29
  • 16 Hessel S J, Adams D F, Abrams H L. Complications of angiography.  Radiology. 1981;  138 273-281
  • 17 Szilagyi D E, Smith R F, Elliot J P et al.. Translumbar aortography: a study of its safety and usefulness.  Arch Surg. 1977;  112 399-408
  • 18 Boks S S, Andhyiswara T, de Smet A A et al.. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transabdominal treatment of a type 2 endoleak.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;  28 526-529
  • 19 Stavropoulos S W, Carpenter J P, Fairman R M et al.. Inferior vena cava traversal for translumbar endoleak embolization after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14 1191-1194
  • 20 McNally-Heintzelman K M, Riley J N, Heintzelman D L. Scaffold-enhanced albumin and n-butyl-cyanoacrylate adhesives for tissue repair: ex vivo evaluation in a porcine model.  Biomed Sci Instrum. 2003;  39 312-317
  • 21 Binkert C A, Alencar H, Singh J et al.. Translumbar type II endoleak repair using angiographic CT.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;  17 1349-1353

Charles T BurkeM.D. 

Department of Radiology, CB#7510, 101 Manning Drive

Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510

    >