Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2007; 11(1): 057-065
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-984414
Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Shoulder: What the Orthopaedic Doctor Needs to Know

Jennifer Vanderbeck1 , John Fenlin2
  • 1Fellow of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • 2Director of Shoulder Service, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Clinical Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jefferson Medical College, The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 July 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Diagnosing shoulder pathology accurately requires both clinical expertise and the ability to interpret and correlate radiographic studies. Variational anatomy of the shoulder combined with the complexity of physical examination makes this difficult. Physical examination of the shoulder often leaves the surgeon with more than one working diagnosis. Imaging studies of the shoulder are more valuable if used to confirm a working diagnosis as opposed to reading the study in a vacuum. Clinical correlation should also be considered for any and all findings on an imaging study. Collaboration of the surgeon and the radiologist is essential in reducing the number of over-reported findings that are clinically insignificant. The surgeon should directly communicate with the radiologist as to his or her working diagnosis and the goal of the study. In this way the surgeon and radiologist become superior diagnosticians.

KEYWORDS

Shoulder joint - rotator cuff - joint instability - magnetic resonance imaging

REFERENCES

  • 1 Vangsness Jr C T, Jorgenson S S, Watson T, Johnson D L. The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum: an anatomical study of 100 shoulders.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;  76 951-954
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Davidson P A, Rivenburgh D W. Mobile superior glenoid labrum: a normal variant or pathologic condition?.  Am J Sports Med. 2004;  32 962-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Snyder S J, Karzel R P, Del Pizzo W, Ferkel R D, Friedman M J. SLAP lesions of the shoulder.  Arthroscopy. 1990;  6 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Palmer W E, Brown J H, Rosenthal D I. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography.  Radiology. 1994;  190 645-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jee W H, McCauley T R, Katz L D, Matheny J M, Ruwe P A, Daigneault J P. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis.  Radiology. 2001;  218 127-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Reuss B L, Schwartzberg R, Zlatkin M B, Cooperman A, Dixon J R. Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions in the community setting: eighty-three arthroscopically confirmed cases.  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;  15 580-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Morrison D, Bigliani L. The clinical significance of variations in acromial morphology.  Orthop Trans. 1987;  11 234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

John FenlinM.D. 

Director of Shoulder Service, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Clinical Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jefferson Medical College, The Rothman Institute

925 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107

      >