Pragmatics and Adult Language Disorders: Past Achievements and Future Directions

ABSTRACT

In this article, the current state of our knowledge of pragmatic disorders in adults with language impairment is assessed. A brief historical background of clinical pragmatics is presented, and the place of adult language pathology within the development of this field is discussed. A comprehensive review is undertaken of pragmatic deficits in adults with language impairments of diverse etiologies. Specifically, pragmatic deficits are examined in adults with left-hemisphere damage, often resulting in aphasia, and in adults with right-hemisphere damage, traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and neurodegenerative disorders (principally, Alzheimer's disease). Although many pragmatic phenomena have been examined in these clinical populations, studies have also tended to neglect important areas of pragmatic functioning in adults with these disorders. Several such areas are identified within a wider discussion of how researchers and clinicians can best pursue future investigations of pragmatics in adults with language impairment.

KEYWORDS

Alzheimer's disease - left- and right-hemisphere damage - pragmatics - schizophrenia - traumatic brain injury

REFERENCES

• 1 Rapin I, Allen D. Developmental language disorders: nosologic considerations. In: Kirk U Neuropsychology of Language, Reading, and Spelling. New York; Academic Press 1983: 155-184
• 2 Bishop D, Rosenbloom L. Classification of childhood language disorders. In: Yule W, Rutter M Language Development and Disorders. London; MacKeith Press 1987: 16-41
• 3 Rapin I. Developmental language disorders: a clinical update.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996;  37 643-655
• 4 Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001
• 5 Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX; Harcourt Assessment 2006
• 6 Whitworth A, Perkins L, Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia. London; Whurr Publishers 1997
• 7 Whitworth A, Perkins L, Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Cognitive Impairment. London; Whurr Publishers 1997
• 8 Coelho C, Flewellyn L. Longitudinal assessment of coherence in an adult with fluent aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 173-182
• 9 Cutica I, Bucciarelli M, Bara B. Neuropragmatics: extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients.  Brain Lang. 2006;  98 12-25
• 10 Borod J, Rorie K, Pick L et al.. Verbal pragmatics following unilateral stroke: emotional content and valence.  Neuropsychology. 2000;  14 112-124
• 11 Chapman S, Ulatowska H, Franklin L, Shobe A, Thompson J, McIntire D. Proverb interpretation in fluent aphasia and Alzheimer's disease: implications beyond abstract thinking.  Aphasiology. 1997;  11 337-350
• 12 Kasher A, Batori G, Soroker N, Graves D, Zaidel E. Effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding conversational implicatures.  Brain Lang. 1999;  68 566-590
• 13 Perkins L, Crisp J, Walshaw D. Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 259-281
• 14 Beeke S. ‘I suppose' as a resource for the construction of turns at talk in agrammatic aphasia.  Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;  17 291-298
• 15 Beeke S, Wilkinson R, Maxim J. Exploring aphasic grammar. 1: A single case analysis of conversation.  Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;  17 81-107
• 16 Oelschlaeger M, Damico J. Partnership in conversation: a study of word search strategies.  J Commun Disord. 2000;  33 205-223
• 17 Perkins L. Applying conversation analysis to aphasia: clinical implications and analytic issues.  Eur J Disord Commun. 1995;  30 372-383
• 18 Myers P. Profiles of communication deficits in patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage: implications for diagnosis and treatment. In: Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Minneapolis, MN; BRK Publishers 1979: 38-46
• 19 Papagno C, Curti R, Rizzo S, Crippa F, Colombo M. Is the right hemisphere involved in idiom comprehension? A neuropsychological study.  Neuropsychology. 2006;  20 598-606
• 20 Brundage S. Comparison of proverb interpretations provided by right-hemisphere-damaged adults and adults with probable dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Clin Aphasiol. 1996;  24 215-231
• 21 Cheang H, Pell M. A study of humor and communicative intention following right hemisphere stroke.  Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;  20 447-462
• 22 McDonald S. Neuropsychological studies of sarcasm.  Metaphor and Symbol. 2000;  15 85-98
• 23 Lehman Blake M. Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;  15 255-267
• 24 Marini A, Carlomagno S, Caltagirone C, Nocentini U. The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures.  Brain Lang. 2005;  93 46-54
• 25 Tompkins C, Boada R, McGarry K, Jones J, Rahn A, Ranier S. Connected speech characteristics of right-hemisphere-damaged adults: a re-examination.  Clin Aphasiol. 1992;  21 113-122
• 26 Hird K, Kirsner K. The effect of right cerebral hemisphere damage on collaborative planning in conversation: an analysis of intentional structure.  Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;  17 309-315
• 27 Rehak A, Kaplan J, Gardner H. Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere-damaged patients.  Brain Lang. 1992;  42 203-217
• 28 Brownell H, Pincus D, Blum A, Rehak A, Winner E. The effects of right-hemisphere brain damage on patients' use of terms of personal reference.  Brain Lang. 1997;  57 60-79
• 29 Blonder L, Burns A, Bowers D, Moore R, Heilman K. Right hemisphere facial expressivity during natural conversation.  Brain Cogn. 1993;  21 44-56
• 30 Tompkins C, Lehman M, Baumgaertner A. Suppression and inference revision in right brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged adults.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 725-742
• 31 Myers P, Brookshire R. The effects of visual and inferential complexity on the picture descriptions of non-brain-damaged and right-hemisphere-damaged adults.  Clin Aphasiol. 1994;  22 25-34
• 32 Purdy M, Belanger S, Liles B. Right-hemisphere-damaged subjects' ability to use context in inferencing.  Clin Aphasiol. 1992;  21 135-143
• 33 Myers P. Inference failure: the underlying impairment in right-hemisphere communication disorders. In: Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 1991: 167-180
• 34 Griffin R, Friedman O, Ween J, Winner E, Happe F, Brownell H. Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: refining the scope of impairment.  Laterality. 2006;  11 195-225
• 35 Mitchell R, Crow T. Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere.  Brain. 2005;  128 963-978
• 36 Tényi T, Herold R, Szili I, Trixler M. Schizophrenics show a failure in the decoding of violations of conversational implicatures.  Psychopathology. 2002;  35 25-27
• 37 Corcoran K, Frith C. Conversational conduct and the symptoms of schizophrenia.  Cognit Neuropsychiatry. 1996;  1 305-318
• 38 Meilijson S, Kasher A, Elizur A. Language performance in chronic schizophrenia: a pragmatic approach.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;  47 695-713
• 39 Prutting C, Kirchner D. A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;  52 105-119
• 40 Docherty N, Cohen A, Nienow T, Dinzeo T, Dangelmaier R. Stability of formal thought disorder and referential communication disturbances in schizophrenia.  J Abnorm Psychol. 2003;  112 469-475
• 41 Bazin N, Perruchet P, Hardy-Bayle M, Feline A. Context-dependent information processing in patients with schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2000;  45 93-101
• 42 Sitnikova T, Salisbury D, Kuperberg G, Holcomb P. Electrophysiological insights into language processing in schizophrenia.  Psychophysiology. 2002;  39 851-860
• 43 Linscott R. Thought disorder, pragmatic language impairment, and generalized cognitive decline in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2005;  75 225-232
• 44 Hays S, Niven B, Godfrey H, Linscott R. Clinical assessment of pragmatic language impairment: a generalizability study of older people with Alzheimer's disease.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 693-714
• 45 Linscott R. The profile of functional impairment in communication (PFIC): a measure of communication impairment for clinical use.  Brain Inj. 1996;  10 397-412
• 46 Brüne M, Bodenstein L. Proverb comprehension reconsidered-‘theory of mind' and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Res. 2005;  75 233-239
• 47 Bibby H, McDonald S. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychologia. 2005;  43 99-114
• 48 Ferstl E, Guthke T, von Cramon D. Text comprehension after brain injury: left prefrontal lesions affect inference processes.  Neuropsychology. 2002;  16 292-308
• 49 McDonald S. Communication disorders following closed head injury: new approaches to assessment and rehabilitation.  Brain Inj. 1992;  6 293-298
• 50 Coelho C, Youse K, Le K. Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults.  Aphasiology. 2002;  16 659-672
• 51 Togher L, Hand L. Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: an investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 755-770
• 52 Chapman S, Ulatowska H, King K, Johnson J, McIntire D. Discourse in early Alzheimer's disease versus normal advanced aging.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1995;  4 124-129
• 53 Cherney L, Canter G. Informational content in the discourse of patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and patients with right brain damage.  Clin Aphasiol. 1992;  21 123-134
• 54 Carlomagno S, Santoro A, Menditti A, Pandolfi M, Marini A. Referential communication in Alzheimer's type dementia.  Cortex. 2005;  41 520-534
• 55 McNamara P, Durso R. Pragmatic communication skills in patients with Parkinson's disease.  Brain Lang. 2003;  84 414-423
• 56 Monetta L, Pell M. Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinson's disease.  Brain Lang. 2007;  , In press
• 57 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists .Clinical Guidelines. Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK; Speechmark Publishing 2005
• 58 Cummings L. Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh; Edinburgh University Press 2005
• 59 Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition; Oxford; Blackwell 1995
• 60 Bara B. Cognitive Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 2005
• 61 Hebert L, Scherr P, Bienias J, Bennett D, Evans D. Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census.  Arch Neurol. 2003;  60 1119-1122