References
- 1
Polkowski M.
Endoscopic ultrasonography.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
16-21
- 2
Khalid A, Nodit L, Zahid M. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate DNA analysis to differentiate malignant
and benign pancreatic masses.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
2493-2500
- 3
Nodit L, McGrath K M, Zahid M. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirate microsatellite loss analysis and
pancreatic endocrine tumor outcome.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2006;
4
1474-1478
- 4
Salek C, Benesova L, Zavoral M. et al .
Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with
allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients
with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
World J Gastroenterol.
2007;
13
3714-3720
- 5
Gomes A L, Bardales R H, Milanezi F. et al .
Molecular analysis of c-Kit and PDGFRA in GISTs diagnosed by EUS.
Am J Clin Pathol.
2007;
127
89-96
- 6
Khalid A, Pal R, Sasatomi E. et al .
Use of microsatellite marker loss of heterozygosity in accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary
malignancy from brush cytology samples.
Gut.
2004;
53
1860-1865
- 7
Khalid A, McGrath K M, Zahid M. et al .
The role of pancreatic cyst fluid molecular analysis in predicting cyst pathology.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2005;
3
967-973
- 8
Aithal G P, Anagnostopoulos G K, Tam W. et al .
EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of ”dual sampling“ (Trucut biopsy plus FNA)
with ”sequential sampling“ (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required).
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
725-730
- 9
Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R. et al .
Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate
on-site cytopathologic examination.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
505-511
- 10
Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N. et al .
Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle
aspiration.
Endoscopy.
2004;
36
397-401
- 11
Polkowski M, Gerke W, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A. et al .
Endosonography-guided trucut biopsy of hypoechoic submucosal tumors of the stomach
[abstract].
Endoscopy.
2006;
38 (Suppl II)
A35
- 12
Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen G M. et al .
EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
248-254
- 13
Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2007;
5
616-623
- 14
Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E. et al .
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in
suspected biliary disease.
Ann Intern Med.
2003;
139
547-557
- 15
Pungpapong S, Wallace M B, Woodward T A. et al .
Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
2007;
41
88-93
- 16
Lam E C, Rego R R, Paquin S C. et al .
In patients referred for investigation because computed tomography suggests thickened
gastric folds, endoscopic ultrasound is superfluous if gastroscopy is normal.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2007;
102
1200-1203
M. Polkowski, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Medical Center for Postgraduate Education
M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology
Roentgena 5
02-781 Warsaw
Poland
Fax: +48-22-5463035
Email: m.polkowski@coi.waw.pl
