Can we predict spontaneous capsule passage after retention? A nationwide study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention

Background and study aims: Although capsule endoscopy has become a central diagnostic tool for small-bowel evaluation, retention of a capsule remains a major concern. This study attempted to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention, and to determine the factors predictive of spontaneous capsule passage after retention.

Patients and methods: Through a nationwide multicenter survey, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1291 patients who had a capsule endoscopy between February 2002 and July 2006 in Korea. Clinical and procedural characteristics and postprocedural outcomes were analyzed for the cases with capsule retention.

Results: Capsule retention occurred in 2.5 % of total cases (32/1291). The major diseases accompanying capsule retention were Crohn’s disease, malignant tumors, and tuberculous enterocolitis, in decreasing order. In 11 of the 32 patients (34.4 %), early surgical or endoscopic interventions were instituted for diagnosis or treatment of diseases before retention symptoms developed. The remaining 21 (65.6 %) patients initially received medical treatments. Of these, 10 (31.3 %) ultimately underwent surgical intervention due to the development of symptoms of intestinal obstruction or medical treatment failure. The other 11 (34.4 %) eventually passed the capsule. The presence of a larger lumen diameter (greater than two-thirds of the capsule diameter) at the stricture site was associated with spontaneous passage.

Conclusions: Our large-scale study suggests that retention occurs infrequently during capsule endoscopy. Moreover, a retained capsule might indicate the best intervention for the offending pathology, or it may spontaneously pass in the long run, particularly in patients with less small bowel stricture.

References

• 1 Swain P, Adler D, Enns R. Capsule endoscopy in obscure intestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 655-659
• 2 Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewkowicz S. et al . Initial experience of wireless-capsule endoscopy for evaluating occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small bowel pathology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 2776-2779
• 3 Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broide E. et al . Diagnosing small bowel Crohn’s disease with wireless capsule endoscopy.  Gut. 2003;  52 390-392
• 4 Shim K N, Kim Y S, Kim K J. et al . Abdominal pain accompanied by weight loss may increase the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: a Korean multicenter study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 983-988
• 5 Fry L C, Carey E J, Shiff A D. et al . The yield of capsule endoscopy in patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 498-502
• 6 Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R. et al . ICCE consensus for capsule retention.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1065-1067
• 7 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al . Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 643-653
• 8 Buchman A L, Miller F H, Wallin A. et al . Videocapsule endoscopy versus barium contrast studies for the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease recurrence involving the small intestine.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 2171-2177
• 9 Cheifetz A S, Kornbluth A A, Legnani P. et al . The risk of retention of the capsule endoscope in patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2218-2222
• 10 Cheifetz A S, Lewis B S. Capsule endoscopy retention: is it a complication?.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  40 688-691
• 11 Baichi M M, Arifuddin R M, Mantry P S. What we have learned from 5 cases of permanent capsule retention.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 283-287
• 12 Rondonotti E, Herrerias J M, Pennazio M, Caunedo A, Mascarenhas-Saraiva M, de Franchis R. Complications, limitations, and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 712-716
• 13 Lewis B. How to prevent endoscopic capsule retention.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 852-856
• 14 Sears D M, Avots-Avotins A, Culp K, Gavin M W. Frequency and clinical outcome of capsule retention during capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 822-827
• 15 Yang S K, Loftus E V, Sandborn W J. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia.  Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001;  7 260-270
• 16 Kim S G, Kim J S, Jung H C, Song I S. Is a 9-month treatment sufficient in tuberculous enterocolitis? A prospective, randomized, single-centre study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  18 85-91
• 17 Tandon H D, Prakash A. Pathology of intestinal tuberculosis and its distinction from Crohn’s disease.  Gut. 1972;  13 260-269
• 18 Barkin J S, Friedman S. Wireless capsule endoscopy requiring surgical intervention. The world’s experience.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 83
• 19 Aberra F N, Lewis J D, Hass D, Rombeau J L, Osborne B, Lichtenstein G R. Corticosteroids and immunomodulators: postoperative infectious complication risk in inflammatory bowel disease patients.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 320-327
• 20 Subramanian V, Pollok R C, Kang J Y, Kumar D. Systematic review of postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with immunomodulators.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 793-799
• 21 Spada C, Spera G, Riccioni M. et al . A novel diagnostic tool for detecting functional patency of the small bowel: the Given patency capsule.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 793-800
• 22 Boivin M L, Lochs H, Voderholzer W A. Does passage of a patency capsule indicate small-bowel patency? A prospective clinical trial.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 808-815
• 23 Signorelli C, Rondonotti E, Villa F. et al . Use of the Given patency system for the screening of patients at high risk for capsule retention.  Dig Liver Dis. 2006;  38 326-330
• 24 Voderholzer W A, Beinhoelzl J, Rogalla P. et al . Small bowel involvement in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and computed tomography enteroclysis.  Gut. 2005;  54 369-373