Radiologie in einem prägraduellen problembasiert-integrierten Medizincurriculum

Zusammenfassung

Prägraduelle medizinische Curricula unterliegen gegenwärtig einem Reformprozess mit einer Abkehr von traditionellen, nach Fächern aufgebauten Studien und einer Hinwendung zu problembasiert integrierten Studien. Von dieser Entwicklung ist auch der Fachbereich Radiologie betroffen, in dem durch kürzer werdende Innovationszyklen bei bildgebenden Verfahren dieser Paradigmenwechsel weiter beschleunigt wird. Für den radiologischen Unterricht erscheint die Festlegung von aus didaktischen Kernkompetenzen abgeleiteten Lernzielen für die drei Schwerpunkte In-vivo-Visualisierung von Anatomie und Organfunktion, Diagnostik sowie interventionelle Therapie sinnvoll. Darauf aufbauend sind adäquate Unterrichtsformen zu entwickeln, in die E-Learning-Angebote einbezogen werden sollten. Das Konzept des fallbasierten Lernens bietet eine sinnvolle Unterstützung. Durch die Erstellung und Nutzung radiologischen Bildmaterials zu Lehrzwecken kann sich das Fach Radiologie, indem Aufgaben aus den Bereichen Anatomie, Pathologie und Entscheidungsfindung übernommen werden, zu einem zentralen Gegenstand moderner Curricula entwickeln. Am Beispiel des Wiener Curriculum-Modells wird die Implementierung eines unter diesen Prämissen gestalteten radiologischen Unterrichts dargelegt.

Abstract

Pregraduate medical curricula are currently undergoing a reform process that is moving away from a traditional discipline-related structure and towards problem-based integrated forms of teaching. Imaging sciences, with their inherently technical advances, are specifically influenced by the effects of paradigm shifts in medical education. The teaching of diagnostic radiology should be based on the definition of three core competencies: in vivo visualization of normal and abnormal morphology and function, diagnostic reasoning, and interventional treatment. On the basis of these goals, adequate teaching methods and e-learning tools should be implemented by focusing on case-based teaching. Teaching materials used in the fields of normal anatomy, pathology, and clinical diagnosis may help diagnostic radiology to play a central role in modern pregraduate curricula.

Key words

curriculum - education - medical - undergraduate methods - radiology education - professional practice standards - clinical competence - computer-assisted instruction - e-learning

Literatur

• 1 Harden R, Sowden S, Funn W. Educational strategies in curriculum development: The SPICES-model.  Med Educ. 1984;  18 284-297
• 2 Christensen L. The Bologna Process and medical education.  Med Teach. 2004;  26 625-629
• 3 WFME . Global Standards for Quality Improvement - Basic Medical Education.  2003;  , www.wfme.org
• 4 Buckenham T. Teaching imaging to undergraduates: strategies and expectations.  N Z Med J. 2005;  118 U1698
• 5 Elnicki D M, Londen van J, Hemmer P A. et al . U. S. and Canadian internal medicine clerkship directors’ opinions about teaching procedural and interpretive skills to medical students.  Acad Med. 2004;  79 1108-1113
• 6 Gunderman R B. Ingredients of successful medical student teaching.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  182 1115-1117
• 7 Collins J. Medical education research: challenges and opportunities.  Radiology. 2006;  240 639-647
• 8 Chew F S. Distributed radiology clerkship for the core clinical year of medical school.  Acad Med. 2002;  77 1162-1163
• 9 Collins J, Dotti S L, Albanese M A. Teaching radiology to medical students: an integrated approach.  Acad Radiol. 2002;  9 1046-1053
• 10 Ekelund L, Elzubeir M. Diagnostic radiology in an integrated curriculum: evaluation of student appraisal.  Acad Radiol. 2000;  7 965-970
• 11 Gunderman R B, Siddiqui A R, Heitkamp D E. et al . The vital role of radiology in the medical school curriculum.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;  180 1239-1242
• 12 Gunderman R B, Alexander S, Jackson V P. et al . The value of good medical student teaching: increasing the number of radiology residency applicants.  Acad Radiol. 2000;  7 960-964
• 13 Bloom B. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York, Toronto; Langmans, Green 1956: 4-88
• 14 Miller G. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.  Acad Med. 1990;  65 563-567
• 15 Bürgi H, Bader C, Bloch R. et al .Swiss Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Training. Joint Converence of Swiss Medical Faculties (SMIFK) Geneva; 2002
• 16 Shannon S. Self-directed learning and continuing professional development.  Can Assoc Radiol J. 2000;  51 326-327
• 17 Peterson C. Factors associated with success or failure in radiological interpretation: diagnostic thinking approaches.  Med Educ. 1999;  33 251-259
• 18 Rogers L F. Imaging literacy: a laudable goal in the education of medical students.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;  180 1201
• 19 Erikson U. Pregraduate Training in Radiology in Europe. European Association of Radiology EAR Access 2000 http://www.ear-online.org/
• 20 Shaffer K, Lewis P. AMSER National Medical Student Curriculum in Radiology. Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology (AMSER) Access. 2004 http://www.aur.org/amser/
• 21 Subramaniam R, Beckley V, Chan M. et al . Radiology curriculum topics for medical students: students’ perspectives.  Acad Radiol. 2006;  13 880-884
• 22 Gunderman R, Williamson K, Fraley R. et al . Expertise: implications for radiological education.  Acad Radiol. 2001;  8 1252-1256
• 23 Ernst R D, Sarai P, Nishino T. et al . Transition from film to electronic media in the first-year medical school gross anatomy lab.  J Digit Imaging. 2003;  16 337-340
• 24 McLachlan J C, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future.  Med Educ. 2006;  40 243-253
• 25 Arger P H, Schultz S M, Sehgal C M. et al . Teaching medical students diagnostic sonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 2005;  24 1365-1369
• 26 Erkonen W E, Albanese M A, Smith W L. et al . Effectiveness of teaching radiologic image interpretation in gross anatomy. A long-term follow-up.  Invest Radiol. 1992;  27 264-266
• 27 Heilo A, Hansen A, Holck P. et al . Ultrasound ‘electronic vivisection’ in the teaching of human anatomy for medical students.  Eur J Ultrasound. 1997;  5 203-207
• 28 Miles K A. Diagnostic imaging in undergraduate medical education: an expanding role.  Clin Radiol. 2005;  60 742-745
• 29 Shaffer K, Small J E. Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy.  Acad Radiol. 2004;  11 1059-1070
• 30 Teichgraber U K, Meyer J M, Poulsen Nautrup C. et al . Ultrasound anatomy: a practical teaching system in human gross anatomy.  Med Educ. 1996;  30 296-298
• 31 Novelline R A, Scheiner J D, Mehta A. et al . Preparing medical students for a filmless environment: instruction on the preparation of electronic case presentations from PACS.  Acad Radiol. 2001;  8 266-268
• 32 Bowen J L. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2217-2225
• 33 Scheiner J D, Novelline R A. Radiology clerkships are necessary for teaching medical students appropriate imaging work-ups.  Acad Radiol. 2000;  7 40-45
• 34 Armstrong P, Ringertz H, Bischof Delaloye A. Referral guidelines for imaging. Luxembourg; European Commission Directorate-General for the Environment 2001: 44-58
• 35 Frühwald F, Imhof H, Kletter K. Orientierungshilfe Radiologie. Anleitung zum optimalen Einsatz der klinischen Radiologie. 3 rd ed. Wien; Verlag der Österreichischen Ärztekammer 2006: 2-47
• 36 Strauss S, Richardson W, Glasziou P. et al .Evidence-based Medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3 rd ed. Edinburgh; Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005: 67-99
• 37 Williamson K B, Kang Y P, Steele J L. et al . The art of asking: teaching through questioning.  Acad Radiol. 2002;  9 1419-1422
• 38 Chew F S, Ochoa E R Jr, Relyea-Chew A. Application of the case method in medical student radiology education.  Acad Radiol. 2005;  12 746-751
• 39 Collins J. Keys to educator effectiveness in radiology.  Acad Radiol. 2006;  13 641-643
• 40 Committee TMPPTRP . Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physicians’ Charter.  Radiology. 2006;  238 383-386
• 41 Gunderman R B, Kang Y P, Fraley R E. et al . Teaching the teachers.  Radiology. 2002;  222 599-603
• 42 Hofer M, Abanador N, Modder U. Effektive Didaktiktrainings fur Dozenten von CME-Fortbildungen (Continuing Medical Education).  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2005;  177 1290-1296
• 43 Levine M S. Primer for clinician scholars in academic radiology.  Radiology. 2004;  231 622-627
• 44 Amorosa J K. How do I mentor medical students interested in radiology?.  Acad Radiol. 2004;  11 91-95
• 45 Levine M S. The art of clinical research with medical students.  Acad Radiol. 2003;  10 527-535
• 46 Gunderman R B. Learning to share.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  185 844-847
• 47 Gessel van E, Nendaz M R, Vermeulen B. et al . Development of clinical reasoning from the basic sciences to the clerkships: a longitudinal assessment of medical students’ needs and self-perception after a transitional learning unit.  Med Educ. 2003;  37 966-974
• 48 Myint P K, Sabanathan K. Role of grand rounds in the education of hospital doctors.  Hosp Med. 2005;  66 297-299
• 49 Collins J. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.  Radiographics. 2006;  26 543-551
• 50 Aitken V, Tabakov S. Evaluation of the e-Learning material developed by EMERALD and EMIT for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy.  Med Eng Phys. 2005;  27 633-639
• 51 Gotthardt M, Siegert M J, Schlieck A. et al . How to successfully implement E-learning for both students and teachers.  Acad Radiol. 2006;  13 379-390
• 52 Wagner M, Heckemann R A, Nomayr A. et al . COMPARE/Radiology, an interactive Web-based radiology teaching program evaluation of user response.  Acad Radiol. 2005;  12 752-760
• 53 Maleck M, Fischer M R, Kammer B. et al . Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology.  Radiographics. 2001;  21 1025-1032
• 54 Seitz J, Schubert S, Volk M. et al . Evaluation radiologischer Lernprogramme im Internet.  Radiologe. 2003;  43 66-76
• 55 Tello R, Davison B D, Blickman J G. The virtual course: delivery of live and recorded continuing medical education material over the Internet.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  174 1519-1521
• 56 Trumm C, Dugas M, Wirth S. et al . Digitales Lehrarchiv Konzept, Implementation und Erfahrungen im universitaren Umfeld.  Radiologe. 2005;  45 724-734
• 57 Niegemann H, Hessel S, Hochscheid-Mauel D. et al .Kompendium E-Learning. Heidelberg, Berlin; Springer 2004: 19-94
• 58 Jedrusik P, Preisack M, Dammann F. Vereinfachte Herstellung multimedialer radiologischer Lernobjekte mit dem Flash-Format.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2005;  177 1009-1015
• 59 Hoa D, Micheau A, Gahide G. Creating an interactive Web-based e-learning course: a practical introduction for radiologists.  Radiographics. 2006;  26 e25; quiz e25
• 60 Teplick S K, Berlin L, Cascade P. et al . Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter.  Radiology. 2006;  238 383-386
• 61 Praschinger A, Stieger S, Kletter K. et al .Diagnostic rounds in undergraduate medical education - are they an effective teaching method?. Genua; International Association for Medical Education AMEE 2006: 215