Horm Metab Res 2007; 39(1): 31-40
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-957353
Original Clinical

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Critical Evaluation of Methods for Determination of Body Fat Content in Children: Back to Basic Parameters?

A. Körner 1 , G. Gelbrich 2 , G. Müller 1 , A. Reich 1 , K. Deutscher 1 , R. Gödicke 3 , B. Gronemann 3 , W. Kiess 1
  • 1University Hospital for Children & Adolescents, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Coordination Center for Clinical Trials Leipzig (KKSL), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • 3Public Health Department of the City of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 4. 5. 2006

Accepted 22. 8. 2006

Publikationsdatum:
16. Januar 2007 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Considering the increasing prevalence of obesity among children and of obesity related disorders in the pediatric population, the reliable evaluation of body fat content in children is of critical importance in research and clinical medicine. In this study, we assessed the congruency of different estimates for body fat content in prepubertal children. We determined anthropometric parameters, such as BMI and skinfold thickness, and bioelectrical impedance in 676 prepubertal Caucasian children. We calculated body fat percentage (BF%) from these parameters applying 5 distinct algorithms and established raw centiles for these models. Expectedly, girls had significantly higher BF% regardless of the method applied. There were, however, significant variances in the calculated amount of BF% between the algorithms, with BIA based equations giving highest BF%, while skinfold based equations tended to provide lower BF% values. Direct comparison of the algorithms revealed a high degree of inconsistency and poor agreement in the assessment of body fat with variations of >10% BF%. Great differences in basic parameters, such as ΔBMI (3.2 kg/m2) or Δskinfolds (1.75-fold), would be needed to reliably predict correct ranking of 10% difference in body fat with 95% probability. In summary, BF% strongly varies depending on both the method as well as the algorithm used. This questions the applicability of such field methods for the assessment of BF% for comparative analyses and the superiority of information over basic parameters such as BMI.

References

Correspondence

W. Kiess

University Hospital for Children & Adolescents

University of Leipzig

Oststrasse 21-25

04317 Leipzig

Telefon: +4934197 26 000

Fax: +4934197 26 009

eMail: Wieland.Kiess@medizin.uni-leipzig.de