Download PDF
Semin Hear 2008; 29(1): 029-041
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021770
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Cultural and Social Perspectives on Attitudes, Noise, and Risk Behavior in Children and Young Adults

Soly I. Erlandsson1 , 2 , Alice Holmes3 , Stephen E. Widén2 , Margareta Bohlin2
  • 1Professor and Head
  • 2Division of Psychology and Organizational Studies, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden
  • 3Professor, Department of Communicative Disorders, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 February 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Interdisciplinary research is critical to the prevention of hearing loss in children and young adults. To meet that goal, this paper focuses on the relationship between the prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss, attitudes to noise and exposure, and how hearing protection use seems to be linked to cultural and socioeconomic factors. Results of a series of studies point to attitudes as one explanatory factor. Additionally, the experience of hearing symptoms such as tinnitus and noise sensitivity increases the likelihood that adolescents and young adults will choose to wear earplugs when attending clubs or discotheques. This behavior can be referred to as an important “trigger” mechanism for the development of health-related behavior. Some general theories on health behavior are discussed to understand the role attitudes play for hearing prevention in young people. Finally, the finding that adolescents seeking professional help for tinnitus appear to have strong fears related to anxious thoughts and reactions associated with the condition is addressed. These fears can be a sign of a phobic reaction, something that most often first appears during adolescence. For these reasons, interdisciplinary research in the investigation of tinnitus distress and hearing conservation in young people seems to be the most relevant approach.

KEYWORDS

Attitudes - noise exposure - adolescence - hearing-related symptoms - socioeconomic status

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior.  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;  50 179-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rutter D, Quine L. Changing Health Behavior: Intervention and Research with Social Cognition Models. Philadelphia, PA; Philadelphia Open University Press-Buckingham 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Widén S E, Holmes A E, Erlandsson S I. Reported hearing protection use in young adults from Sweden and the USA: effects of attitude and gender.  Int J Audiol. 2006;  45 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Niskar A S, Kieszak S M, Holmes A E, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody D J. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: The Third National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States.  Pediatrics. 2001;  108 40-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lang S S. Kids near airports don't read as well.  Hum Ecol Forum. 1997;  25 4-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Evans G W, Maxwell L. Chronic noise exposure and reading deficits: the mediating effects of language acquisition.  Environ Behav. 1997;  29 638-657
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Evans G W, Marcynyszyn L A. Environmental justice, cumulative environmental risk, and health among low- and middle-income children in upstate New York.  Am J Public Health. 2004;  94 1942-1944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Boholm Å, Ferriera C. Osäkerhetens representationer [Representations of uncertainty]. In: Boholm Å, Hansson SO, Persson J, Peterson M Osäkerhetens Horisonter. Kulturella och Estetiska Perspektiv på Samhällets Riskfrågor [The Horizons of Uncertainty. Cultural and Aestethic Perspectives on Risk Issues in Society]. Nora; Nya bokförlaget Doxa 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Widén S E. Noise and Music - A Matter of Risk Perception? [PhD thesis]. Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Göteborg University 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Binde P. Risk som diskurs [Risk as discourse]. In: Boholm Å, Hansson SO, Persson J, Peterson M Osäkerhetens Horisonter. Kulturella och Estetiska Perspektiv på Samhällets Riskfrågor [The Horizons of Uncertainty. Cultural and Aestethic Perspectives on Risk Issues in Society]. Nora; Nya bokförlaget Doxa 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Antonovsky A. Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality.  Milband Memorial Fund Quarterly. 1967;  XLV 31-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chen E, Boyce W T, Mattews K A. Socioeconomic differences in children's health: how and why do these relationships change with age?.  Psychol Bull. 2002;  128 295-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Widén S, Erlandsson S I. The influence of socio-economic status on adolescent attitude to social noise and hearing protection.  Noise Health. 2004;  25 59-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Serra M R, Biassoni E C, Richter U et al.. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolecents. Part 1: an interdisciplinary long-term study.  Int J Audiol. 2005;  44 65-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Biassoni E C, Serra M R, Richter U et al.. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Part 2: development of hearing disorders.  Int J Audiol. 2005;  44 74-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Clark W W. Hearing: the effects of noise.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;  106 669-676
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stansfeld S. Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: epidemiological and psychophysiological studies.  Psychol Med (Monograph Suppl 22). 1992; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stansfeld S, Gallacher J, Babisch W, Shipley S. Road traffic noise and psychiatric disorder: prospective findings from the Caerphilly Study.  BMJ. 1996;  313 266-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bohlin M, Erlandsson S I. Adolescent risk taking-leisure time noise and risk behaviour. Presented at: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Children at Work & Play October 19-20, 2006 Cincinnati, OH;
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Widén S E, Erlandsson S I. Risk perception in musical settings-a qualitative study.  International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 2007;  2 33-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Natvig K G, Albrektsen G, Anderssen N, Qvarnström U. School-related stress and psychosomatic symptoms among achool adolescents.  J Sch Health. 1999;  69 362-368
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Santalahti P, Aromaa M, Sourander A, Helenius H, Piha J. Have there been changes in children's psychosomatic symptoms? A 10-year comparison in Finland.  Pediatrics. 2005;  115 e434-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Erginoz E, Alikasifoglu M, Ercan O, Uysal O, Ercan G, Ilter D. Perceived health status in Turkish adolescent sample: risk and protective factors.  Eur J Pediatr. 2004;  163 485-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rosenstock I M. The health belief model and preventive health behavior.  Health Educ Monogr. 1974;  2 354-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kentish R C, Crocker S R, McKenna L. Children's experience of tinnitus: a preliminary survey of children presenting to a psychology department.  Br J Audiol. 2000;  34 335-340
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Zuckerman M. Are you a risk taker?.  Psychol Today. 2000;  33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Arnett J. The soundtrack of recklessness - musical preferences and reckless behavior among adolescents.  J Adolesc Res. 1992;  7 313-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gullone E, Moore S, Moss S, Boyd C. Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality.  J Adolesc. 2000;  23 393-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Soly I ErlandssonPh.D. 

Division of Psychology and Organizational Studies, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences

University West, SE-461 86 Trollhättan, Sweden

Email: soly.erlandsson@hv.se

      >