Summary
The insulin clamp technique, which is often assumed to measure the ability of insulin
to stimulate glucose uptake, actually measures both insulin-independent and insulin-dependent
glucose uptake. In contrast, the minimal model technique, recently introduced by Bergman, Philips and Cobelli (1981), attempts to directly estimate insulin sensitivity (insulin-dependent glucose
uptake = S1 ) by measurement of plasma glucose and insulin values during a 3 hour intravenous
glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). In the present study estimates of insulin action derived
from the insulin clamp and the minimal model technique were compared in 20 humans
with varying degrees of glucose tolerance. The insulin response during the IVGTT was
too low to permit calculation of S1 in 5 subjects - 4 with Type II diabetes and 1 with normal glucose tolerance. Although
the correlation coefficient between the two tests in the other 15 patients was statistically
significant (r = 0.53, P < 0.05), this statement is somewhat misleading. Thus, S1 in the 4/7 patients with Type II diabetes in whom it could be measured was zero,
and the correlation between estimates of insulin action with the two techniques in
the 11 non-diabetic patients was not statistically significant (r = 0.41, P = NS)
when these 4 patients were removed from the analysis. In conclusion, these data indicate
that there was only a weak correlation between estimates of insulin action assessed
with the insulin clamp and the minimal model techniques. One explanation for this
observation is that the insulin-independent component of total glucose disposal both
varies widely among patients and contributes significantly to glucose uptake as assessed
by the insulin clamp technique. Alternatively, one, or both, of the approaches lacks
the desired precision. In either event, it is obvious that these two methods of estimating
insulin action do not provide similar information in humans.
Key-Words:
Insulin Action
-
Minimal Model Technique
-
Insulin Clamp
-
Insulin Resistance
-
Insulin Sensitivity