Planta Med 2006; 72 - P_292
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-950092

Possible involvement of muscarinic mechanisms in contractile response of guinea pig ileum by Erythrina velutina

RM Marçal 1, ACS Carvalho 1, DS Almeida 1, ICM Mello 1, AR Antoniolli 1
  • 1Physiology Department, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, s/n; CEP 49.100–000, SE, Brazil

The plant Erythrina velutina Willd (Fabaceae) is popularly used to combat pain and anxiety in Brazil [1]. We have recently reported that E. velutina (AEEV) produces an opioid-like antinociceptive effect in mice [2]. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism of action of AEEV in the guinea pig ileum. E. velutina leaves, collected in Brazil (10€56'S, 37€05'W), were infused and lyophilized (8.32%). Terminal segments of guinea pig ileum (n=5–8) were mounted in an organ bath and isotonic contractions were recorded. AEEV (0.05–2.5mg/mL) contracted the guinea pig ileum (0.86±0.31g –1.45±0.16g) and increased neurogenic contractions (0.1Hz; 0.5 ms; 40 V) by a maximum of 57.7±9.1% (p<0.01). Tetrodotoxine (1µM; p<0.01; 38.2±2.5%), a neuronal sodium channel blocker, and the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (10µM; p<0.01; 38.7±13.2%) reduced contractile response induced by aqueous extract (1.5mg/mL). Verapamil (10 nM; 52.4±9.8%; p<0.01), an L-type Ca+2 channel blocker, or low Ca+2 concentration (76.0±6.1%; p<0.05) also reduced the contractile response to AEEV. Atropine (10µM) along with verapamil (10 nM) abolished AEEV-induced contractile response (p<0.001; 98.1±1.4%). In conclusion, an opioid-like response could not be detected in the guinea pig ileum. Indeed, these results suggest that the contractile response of the aqueous extract of Erythrina velutina involves a neurotransmitter release, possibly acetylcholine, muscarinic receptor activation, augmentation of Ca+2 entry through L-type calcium channels and calcium release from the intracellular stores.

Acknowledgments: CNPq.

References: 1. Dantas, M.C. et al. (2004), J. Ethnopharmacol. 94: 12. 2. Marchioro, M. et al. (2005), Fitoterapia 76: 637.