Background and study aims: The aims of the study were to describe the magnified endoscopic findings in the gastric
body, correlate these with histology, and evaluate their reproducibility in the assessment
of the magnified endoscopic patterns seen.
Patients and methods: A total of 95 consecutive dyspeptic patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
with a magnifying endoscope. The endoscopists classified the magnified endoscopic
patterns and correlated them with the histological findings. In the second part of
the study, 200 images were shown to five endoscopists in order to examine inter- and
intraobserver variability in image assessment.
Results: The magnified endoscopic findings in the gastric body were categorized into four
types: type 1, honeycomb-type subepithelial capillary network (SECN) with regular
arrangement of collecting venules and regular, round pits; type 2, honeycomb-type
SECN with regular, round pits, but loss of collecting venules; type 3, loss of normal
SECN and collecting venules, with enlarged white pits surrounded by erythema; and
type 4, loss of normal SECN and round pits, with irregular arrangement of collecting
venules. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values
of the type 1 pattern for predicting normal gastric mucosa were 92.7 % (95 % confidence
interval [CI] 93.2 % - 97.3 %), 100 % (95 %CI 83.9 % - 100 %), 100 % (95 %CI 92.9
% - 100 %), and 83.8 % (95 %CI 65.5 %- 93.9 %). The sensitivity, specificity, and
positive and negative predictive values of types 2 and 3 patterns for predicting a
Helicobacter pylori -infected stomach were 100 % (95 %CI 83.9 % - 100 %), 92.7 % (95 %CI 93.2 % - 97.3
%), 83.8 % (95 %CI 65.5 % - 93.9 %), and 100 % (95 %CI 92.9 % - 100 %). The sensitivity,
specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of a type 4 pattern for predicting
gastric atrophy were 90 % (95 %CI 66.8 % - 98.2 %), 96 % (95 %CI 87.9 %- 98.9 %),
85.7 % (95 %CI 62.6 % - 96.2 %), and 97.3 % (95 %CI 89.6 %- 99.5 %. The kappa values
for inter- and intraobserver agreement in predicting normal gastric mucosa, H. pylori gastritis, and gastric atrophy were 0.864 and 0.913 respectively.
Conclusion: High-resolution magnification endoscopy can reliably identify the normal gastric
mucosa, H. pylori associated gastritis, and gastric atrophy in a Western population.
References
1 Cancer Research Campaign .Factsheet 1. Incidence-UK. Cancer Research Campaign 1998
2
Correa P.
Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process. First American
Cancer Society Award lecture on cancer epidemiology and prevention.
Cancer Res.
1992;
52
6735-6740
3
Whitling J L, Sigurdsson A, Rowlands D C. et al .
The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions.
Gut.
2002;
50
378-381
4
Bah A, Saraga E, Armstrong D. et al .
Endoscopic features of Helicobacter pylori -related gastritis.
Endoscopy.
1995;
27
593-596
5
Calabrese C, di Febo G, Armstrong D. et al .
Correlation between endoscopic features of gastric antrum, histology, and Helicobacter pylori infection in adults.
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
1999;
31
593-596
6
Loffeld R J.
Diagnostic value of endoscopic signs of gastritis with special emphasis to nodular
antritis.
Neth J Med.
1999;
54
96-100
7
Redeen S, Petersson F, Johnson K A. et al .
Relationship of gastroscopic features to histological findings in gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection in a general population sample.
Endoscopy.
2003;
35
946-950
8
Dixon M F, Genta R M, Yardley J H. et al .
Classification and grading of gastritis: the updated Sydney System. International
Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston, Texas, USA, 1994.
Am J Surg Pathol.
1996;
20
1161-1181
9
Yao K, Oishi T, Matsui T. et al .
Novel magnified endoscopic findings of microvascular architecture in intramucosal
gastric cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
279-284
10
Yao K, Tatsuhiro O.
Microgastroscopic findings of mucosal microvascular architecture as visualized by
magnifying endoscopy. Novel magnified endoscopic findings of microvascular architecture
in intramucosal gastric cancer.
Dig Endosc.
2001;
13 (Suppl 1)
S27-S33
11
Yagi K, Nakamura A, Sekine A.
Magnifying endoscopy of the gastric body: a comparison of the findings before and
after Helicobacter pylori eradication.
Dig Endos.
2002;
14
76-82
12
Iaine L, Cohen H, Sloane R. et al .
Interobserver agreement and predictive value of endoscopic findings for H. pylori and gastritis in normal volunteers.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
42
420-423
13
Mond D J, Pochaczevsky R, Vernace F. et al .
Can the radiologist recognize Helicobacter pylori gastritis?.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1995;
20
199-202
14
Yela M C, Manzano M L, Rodrigues-Munoz S. et al .
Assessment of the usefulness of endoscopic signs in Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig.
1997;
89
3-12
15
Khakoo S I, Lobo A J, Shepherd N A. et al .
Histological assessment of the Sydney classification of endoscopic gastritis.
Gut.
1994;
35
1172-1175
16 Tsuchihashi Y.
Structural alterations of mucosal microvascular system in human chronic gastritis. In: Manabe H, Zweifach BW, Messmer K, (eds). Microcirculation in circulatory disorders. Tokyo;
Springer-Verlag 1988: 161-169
17
Yagi K, Nakamura A, Sekine A.
Endoscopic features of the normal gastric mucosa without Helicobacter pylori infection [in Japanese with English abstract].
Gastroenterol Endosc.
2000;
10
1977-1987
18
Nakagawa S, Kato M, Shimizu Y. et al .
Relationship between histopathologic gastritis and mucosal microvascularity: observations
with magnifying endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
71-75
19
Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Burg J. et al .
Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori in vivo by confocal laser endoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2005;
128
2119-2123
Dr K. Ragunath
Associate Professor in Endoscopy, Wolfson Digestive Diseases Centre University of Nottingham
NG7 2UH UK
Telefon: +44(0)1159249924
Fax: +44(0)1159422232
eMail: k.ragunath@nottingham.ac.uk