Viszeralchirurgie 2006; 41(3): 191-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933455
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Transanale Verfahren zur Therapie des Rektumprolaps - Indikation, Technik und Ergebnisse

Perineal Approach in the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse - Indication, Technique and ResultsM. Sailer1
  • 1Bethesda - Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Bergedorf, Akad. Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Hamburg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 June 2006 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Zur chirurgischen Therapie des manifesten Rektumprolaps stehen grundsätzlich zwei verschiedene Zugangswege zur Verfügung, nämlich der transabdominelle und der sog. perineale. Die folgende Arbeit gibt eine Übersicht über die perinealen Verfahren, wobei insbesondere die Operation nach Rehn-Delorme sowie die perineale Rektosigmoidektomie nach Altemeier detailliert diskutiert werden. Die perinealen Techniken können in Regional- oder Lokalananästhesie und - in geeigneten Fällen - durchaus ambulant durchgeführt werden. Generell sind diese Operationen mit wenig Komplikationen behaftet und eignen sich daher auch für betagte Patienten mit einem entsprechenden Risikoprofil. Dem gegenüber steht eine höhere Rezidivrate im Vergleich zu abdominellen Verfahren. Insbesondere die Operation nach Altemeier erfährt derzeit eine Renaissance, da neuere Studien eine verhältnismäßig geringe Rezidivrate bei ebenso niedriger Komplikationsdichte aufweisen. Zusammenfassend kann festgestellt werden, dass perineale Operationsverfahren zur chirurgischen Therapie des Rektumprolaps weiterhin einen festen Stellenwert in der Viszeralchirurgie haben.

Abstract

Two different approaches can be distinguished in the surgical treatment of rectal prolapse, i. e. the transabdominal route or perineal procedures. The following article deals with perineal procedures with a detailed discussion of the Delorme's operation and the perineal rectosigmoidectomy, also known as the Altemeier procedure. These operations can be performed using regional or local anaesthesia which make them suitable for outpatient procedures in well selected cases. In general, perineal procedures for full-thickness rectal prolapse cause less morbidity compared with abdominal operations. They are especially indicated in the elderly and/or high-risk patients. Recurrences, on the other hand, are generally encountered more often following local techniques as compared with abdominal operations. Recent studies, however, have shown that the Altemeier operation can be carried out with minimal morbidity and low recurrence rate which explains the renewed interest in this technique. It can be concluded that perineal procedures remain important options in the surgical treatment of rectal rolapse and should be part of the armamentarium of colorectal surgeons.

Literatur

  • 1 Kuijpers J H, de Morree H. Toward a selection of the most appropriate procedure in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 355-357
  • 2 Sainio A P, Halme L E, Husa A I. Anal encirclement with polypropelene mesh for rectal prolapse and incontinene.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 905-908
  • 3 Earnshaw J J, Hopkinson B R. Late results of silicon rubber perineal suture for rectal polapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;  30 86-88
  • 4 Hunt T M, Fraser I A, Maybury N K. Treatment of rectal prolapse by sphincteric support using silastic rods.  Br J Surg. 1985;  72 491-492
  • 5 Watts A M, Thompson M R. Evaluation of elorme's procedure as a treatment for full thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 2000;  87 218-222
  • 6 Marchal F, Bresler L, Ayav A. et al . Long-term results of Delorme's procedure and Orr-Loygue rectopexy to treat complete rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1785-1790
  • 7 Tobin S A, Scott I CH. Delorme operation for rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1681-1684
  • 8 Senapati A, Nicholls R J, Phillips R K. Result of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;  37 456-460
  • 9 Lechaux J P, Lechaux D, Perez M. Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified technique.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 301-307
  • 10 Pescatori M, Interisano A, Stolfi V M, Zoffoli M. Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.  Int J Colorect Dis. 1998;  13 223-227
  • 11 Yakut M, Kaymakcioglu N, Simsek A. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. A retrospective analysis of 94 cases.  Int Surg. 1998;  83 53-55
  • 12 Watkins B P, Landercasper J, Belzer G E. et al . Long-term follow-up of the modified Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse.  Arch Surg. 2003;  138 498-502
  • 13 Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Clinical and physiological analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1260-1265
  • 14 Plusa S M, Clarig J A, Balaij V. Physiological changes after Delorme's procedure for full thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1475-1478
  • 15 Chow P K, Ho Y H. Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure. Comparison of clinical and physiological outcome.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;  11 201-202
  • 16 Altemeier W A, Ginsefi J, Hoxworth P. Treatment of extensive prolapse of the rectum in aged or debilitated patients.  Arch Surg. 1952;  65 72-80
  • 17 Altemeier W A, Culbertson W R, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years experience with the one stage repair of rectal rolapse.  Ann Surg. 1971;  173 993-1006
  • 18 Friedman R, Mugga-Sullam M, Freund H R. Experience with one stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;  26 789-791
  • 19 Williams J G, Rothenberger D A, Madoff R D, Goldberg S M. Treatment of rectal rolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 830-834
  • 20 Johansen O B, Wexner S D, Daniel N, Nogueras J J, Jagelman D G. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the ederly.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 767-772
  • 21 Ramanujam P S, Venkatesh K S, Fietz M J. Perineal excision of rectal procidentia in elderly high risk patients. A ten year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;  37 1027-1030
  • 22 Kim D, Tsang C, Wong W, Lowry A, Goldberg S, Madoff R. Complete rectal prolase: evolution of management and results.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 460-469
  • 23 Azimuddin K, Khubchandani I, Rosen L, Stasik J, Riether R, Reed J. Rectal prolapse: a search for the “best operation”.  Am Surg. 2001;  67 622-627
  • 24 Kimmins M H, Evetts B K, Isler J, Billingham R. The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  22 565-570
  • 25 Zbar A, Takashima S, Hasegawa T, Kitabayashi K. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier's procedure): a review of physiology, technique and outcome.  Tech Coloproctol. 2002;  6 109-116
  • 26 Yoshioka K, Ogunbiyi O A, Keighley M RB. Pouch perineal rectosigmoidectomy gives better functional results than conventional rectosigmoidectomy in elderly patients with rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 1525-1526
  • 27 Williams N S, Giordano P, Dvorkin L S, Huang A, Hetzer F H, Scott S M. External pelvic rectal suspension (the Express procedure) for full-thickness rectal prolapse: evolution of a new technique.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 307-316
  • 28 Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal rolapse in adults (Cochrane review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. 2001
  • 29 Deen K I, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley M RB. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perianal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolpse.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 302-304

Prof. Dr. Marco Sailer

Bethesda - Allgemeines Krankenhaus · Bergedorf · Akad. Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Hamburg

Glindersweg 80

21029 Hamburg

Phone: 0 40/7 25 54 12 10

Fax: 0 40/7 25 54 12 12

Email: sailer@bakb.net

    >