Analysis of Surgical Management of Calvarial Tumours and First Results of a Newly Designed Robotic Trepanation System

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the surgical strategy in patients with calvarial tumours, in order to design and modify a robot-assisted trepanation system. A total of 75 patients underwent craniectomy for the treatment of calvarial tumours during the 10-year period from 1993 to 2002. The patients’ complaints, the size, location and histology of the tumour, and the various cranioplasty techniques used were analysed retrospectively. In a second procedure several craniectomies at typical locations according to the study’s results were performed in a laboratory setting using a hexapod robotic tool, constructed at the Helmholtz-Institute, RWTH Aachen University, and plastic model heads. The workflow was documented and the reproducibility and the accuracy of the procedure were registered. A total of 83 surgical procedures were performed on 75 patients. The majority (87 %) of lesions treated surgically were located in the frontal, temporal and anterior parts of the parietal region. Histological examination revealed benign lesions in 66 % of the patients and dural involvement in 46 %. According to these results craniectomies were performed using the robotic system. Mean positioning accuracy of the robotic system while milling was 0.24 mm, with a standard deviation of 0.04 mm, and maximum error under 1 mm. Craniectomies leaving a 1-mm layer of the tabula interna intact to ensure a healthy dura were performed in several regions successfully. The majority of calvarial tumours, requiring surgical treatment in our patients, were located in cosmetically relevant areas in which drilling can be carried out with the robotic trepanation system. Consequently, the surgical approach had to be planned carefully in order to achieve a good cosmetic outcome.

Key words

Trepanation - robotic assisted surgery - calvarial tumours - neurosurgery

References

• 1 Arana E, Marti-Bonmati L, Paredes R, Bautista D. Focal calvarial bone lesions: comparison of logistic regression and neural network models.  Invest Radiol. 1999;  33 738-745
• 2 Arana E, Marti-Bonmati L, Bautista D, Paredes R. Qualitative diagnosis of calvarial metastasis by neural network and logistic regression.  Acad Radiol. 2004;  11 45-52
• 3 Ciray I, Astrom G, Sundstrom C, Hagberg H, Ahlstrom H. Assessment of suspected bone metastases. CT with and without clinical information compared to CT-guided bone biopsy.  Acta Radiol. 1997;  38 890-895
• 4 Hunt J A, Hobar P C. Common craniofacial anomalies: conditions of craniofacial atrophy/hypoplasia and neoplasia.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 1497-1508
• 5 Constans J P, Donzelli R. Surgical features of cranial metastases.  Surg Neurol. 1981;  15 35-38
• 6 Couldwell W T, Fankhauser H, de Tribolet N. Osseous metastases from a benign intraventricular meningioma. Case report.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;  117 195-199
• 7 Artico M, de Garo G MF, Salvati M, Carloja S, Rastelli E, Wierzbicki V, Manni M. Solitary metastases of the cranial vault - report of ten cases.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  44 33-38
• 8 Bogaev C A. Cosmetic considerations in cranial base surgery.  Neurosurg Clin North Am. 2002;  13 421-441
• 9 Sekhar L N. The cosmetic aspects of neurosurgery.  Neurosurg Clin North Am. 2002;  13 401-403
• 10 Wecht D, Sawaya R. Lesions of the calvaria: surgical experience with 42 patients.  Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;  4 28-36
• 11 Federspil P A, Geisthoff U W, Henrich D, Plinkert P K. Development of the first force-controlled robot for otoneurosurgery.  Laryngoscope. 2003;  113 465-471
• 12 Plinkert P K, Federspil P A, Plinkert B, Henrich D. Force-based local navigation in robot-assisted implantation in the lateral skull base. An experimental study.  HNO. 2002;  50 233-239
• 13 Eggers G, Wirtz C, Korb W, Engel D, Schorr O, Kotrikova B, Raczkowsky J, Wörn H, Mühling J, Hassfeld S, Marmulla R. Robot-assisted craniotomy.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2005;  48 154-158
• 14 Campbell M J, Machin D. Medical statistics. A commonsense approach. New York: Wiley 1990
• 15 Popovic A, Engelhardt M, Heger S, Radermacher K. Efficient non-invasive registration with A-mode ultrasound in skull surgery: Method and first clinical trials. International Congress Series (2005). In: Lemke HU et al. (eds.). CARS 2005; Elsevier Science: 821-826
• 16 Bast P, Engelhardt M, Popovic A, Schmieder K, Radermacher K. CRANIO - Entwicklung eines Systems zur computer- und roboterunterstützten Kraniotomie.  Biomedizinische Technik. 2002;  47 (Suppl 1) 9-11
• 17 Clauser L, Vinci R, Curioni C. Dismantling and reassembling of the facial skeleton in tumor surgery of the craniomaxillofacial area. History, surgical anatomy, and notes of surgical technique: Part 1.  J Craniofac Surg. 2000;  11 318-325
• 18 Hefti F, Jundt G. Langerhans cell histiocytosis.  Orthopaede. 1995;  24 73-81
• 19 Howarth D M, Gilchrist G S, Mullan B P, Wiseman G A, Edmonson J H, Schomberg P J. Langerhans cell histiocytosis: diagnosis, natural history, management and outcome.  Cancer. 1999;  85 2278-2290
• 20 Saringer W, Nobauer-Huhmann I, Knosp E. Cranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;  144 1193-1203
• 21 Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M. Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;  144 1033-1040
• 22 Eufinger H, Wehmoeller M, Machtens E, Heuser L, Harders A, Kruse D. Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM - manipulated CT-data.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1995;  23 175-181