An Unexpected Double-Bond Isomerization Catalyzed by Crabtree’s Iridium(I) Catalyst

Michael Krel; Jean-Yves Lallemand; Catherine Guillou

doi:10.1055/s-2005-871935

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Synlett 2005(13): 2043-2046
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-871935

LETTER

An Unexpected Double-Bond Isomerization Catalyzed by Crabtree’s Iridium(I) Catalyst

Michael Krel, Jean-Yves Lallemand, Catherine Guillou*
Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, Bt 27, CNRS Avenue de la Terrasse, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Fax: +33(1)69077247; e-Mail: guillou@icsn.cnrs-gif.fr;

Further Information

Publication History

Received 2 May 2005
Publication Date:
12 July 2005 (online)

Abstract
Full Text
References

Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

The first iridium-catalyzed isomerization of an exocyclic into an endocyclic double bond is described. A mechanism is proposed for this reaction. Crabtree’s catalyst thus allows the migration of a double bond that does not occur under classical conditions.

Key words

iridium - catalysis - isomerization - olefination - aldol-like reaction

References

1 Hoveyda AH. Evans DA. Fu GC. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93: 1307 ; and references therein

Crossref Google Scholar
2a Crabtree RH. Felkin H. Morris GE. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 141: 205

Crossref Google Scholar
2b Crabtree RH. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12: 331

Crossref Google Scholar
2c Crabtree RH. Demou PC. Eden D. Mihelnic JM. Parnell CA. Quirk JM. Morris GE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104: 6994

Crossref Google Scholar
3a Stork G. Kahne DE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105: 1072

Crossref Google Scholar
3b Schultz A. McCloskey PJ. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50: 5905

Crossref Google Scholar
3c Brown JM. Hall SA. J. Organomet. Chem. 1985, 285: 333

Crossref Google Scholar
3d Brown JM. Hall SA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25: 1393

Crossref Google Scholar
3e Brown JM. Naik RG. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982, 348

Crossref Google Scholar
3f Takagi M. Yamamoto K. Tetrahedron 1991, 47: 8869

Crossref Google Scholar
4a D’Angelo J. Revial G. Volpe T. Pfau M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29: 4427

Google Scholar
4b Lundkvist JRM. Johansson AM. Arvidsson LE. Hacksell U. Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B 1986, 40: 508

Google Scholar
5 Abell AD. Phillips AJ. Budhia S. McNulty AN. Neubauer BL. Aust. J. Chem. 1998, 51: 389

Crossref Google Scholar
6 Cornforth JW. Robinson R. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 1855

Google Scholar
7a Karisami K. Koskinen AMP. Nissenen M. Rissanen K. Tetrahedron 2003, 59: 1421

Crossref Google Scholar
7b Müller P. Nury P. Bernardinelli G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 4137

Crossref Google Scholar
7c Longobardo L. Mobbili G. Tagliavini E. Trombini C. Umari-Ronchi A. Tetrahedron 1992, 48: 1299

Crossref Google Scholar
11 For isomerization of allylamides see: Neugnot B. Cintrat JC. Rousseau B. Tetrahedron 2004, 60: 3575

Crossref Google Scholar
For the isomerization of allyl ethers see:
12a Nelson SG. Bungard CJ. Wang K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 13000

Google Scholar
12b Ohmura T. Yamamoto YY. Miyaura N. Organometallics 1999, 18: 413 ; and references therein

Google Scholar

8

Representative Procedures for the Synthesis of 3 and 1.1-(5-Methoxy-1-methyl-2-methylene-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)ethanol ( 3).
To a solution of aldehyde 12 (83 mg, 0.38 mmol) in THF was added methyllithium (1.6 N solution in hexane, 0.53 mL, 0.85 mmol) at -78 °C. The solution was stirred at
-78 °C for 2 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with aq sat. NaHCO₃ at -78 °C and extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The combined organic layers were washed with H₂O, brine, and dried (Na₂SO₄), and the solvent was evaporated. Chromatography on preparative TLC (elution with heptane-EtOAc, 85:15) of the residue afforded 3 (77 mg, 87%) as a colorless oil. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.19 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H7), 6.98 (d, J = 8,0 Hz, 1 H, H6), 6.73 (d, J = 8,0 Hz, 1 H, H8), 5.13 (s, 1 H, 15%, H14α), 5.11 (s, 1 H, 85%, H14α), 5.00 (s, 1 H, 85%, H14β), 4.91 (s, 1 H, 15%, H14β), 4.13 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H, 15%, H13), 4.06 (quad, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, 85%, H13), 3.83 (s, 3 H, H11), 3.10-2.95 (m, 1 H, H4α), 2.69-2.36 (m, 3 H, H4β-H3), 1.48 (s, 3 H, H12), 1.69 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H, 15%, H15), 1.02 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H, 85%, H15) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 157.5 (C5), 151.0 (C2), 144.5 (C9), 127.2 (C7), 126.9 (C10), 119.6 (C8), 111.2 (C15), 108.1 (C6), 74.1 (C13), 56.1 (C11), 48.9 (C1), 32.7 (C3), 23.1 (C12), 19.5 (C14) ppm. IR (CHCl₃): ν = 1577, 1461, 1251, 1047 cm^-1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₁₅H₂₀O₂: 232.1463; found: 255.1374 [M + Na].
1-(5-Methoxy-1,2-dimethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)ethanol ( 1). A solution of alcohol 3 (28 mg, 0.12 mmol) in 2 mL of CH₂Cl₂ in a Schlenk apparatus was cooled at -180 °C and degassed under vacuum then filled with argon. Crabtree’s catalyst (10 mg, 0.012 mmol) was added and the solution degassed again under vacuum and filled with argon. The mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. and the Schlenk tube was linked to an hydrogenation apparatus. The system was flushed ten times with hydrogen and stirred 12 h at r.t. under an atmospheric pressure of hydrogen. The solvent was then removed under vacuum and the resulting slurry dissolved in Et₂O and filtered on a short silica pad. Chromatography on preparative TLC (elution with heptane-EtOAc, 85:15) of the residue afforded 1 (26 mg, 92%) as a colorless oil. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.19 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, H7), 6.98 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H6), 6.73 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H8), 5.13 (s, 1 H, 15%, H14α), 5.11 (s, 1 H, 85%, H14α), 5.00 (s, 1 H, 85%, H14β), 4.91 (s, 1 H, 15%, H14β), 4.13 (quad, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H, 15%, H13), 4.06 (quad, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H, 85%, H13), 3.83 (s, 3 H, H11), 3.10-2.95 (m, 1 H, H4α), 2.69-2.36 (m, 3 H, H4β-H3), 1.48 (s, 3 H, H12), 1.69 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H, 15%, H15), 1.02 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H, H15) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 157.5 (C5), 151.0 (C2), 144.5 (C9), 127.2 (C7), 16.9 (C10), 119.6 (C8), 111.2 (C15), 108.1 (C6), 74.1 (C13), 56.1 (C11), 48.9 (C1), 32.7 (C3), 25.1 (C4), 23.1 (C12), 19.5 (C14) ppm. IR (CHCl₃): ν = 3453, 1579, 1459, 1254, 1062 cm^-1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₁₅H₂₂O₂: 234.1620; found: 257.1492 [M + Na].

9

When this reaction was conducted in the same conditions with shorter time (1 h) no isomerization of 3 was observed.

10

Representative Procedures for the Synthesis of 13, 14, 4 and 15.1-(1,4-Dimethoxybutyl)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-3,4-dihydro-1 H -naphthalen-2-one ( 13).
To a solution of 9 (68 mg, 0.26 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ 580 mL was added 1,1,4-trimethoxybutane (3.8 g, 26.2 mmol) at
-78 °C. The solution was stirred at -78 °C for 10 min then BF₃·OEt₂ (2.94 mL, 23.2 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 6 h at -78 °C. The residue was diluted with CH₂Cl₂ and washed with sat. aq NaHCO₃. The combined organic layers were washed with H₂O, brine, and dried (Na₂SO₄), and the solvent was evaporated. Flash chromatography on silica gel (elution with heptane-EtOAc, 90:10) of the residue afforded 13 (3.63 g, 76%) and 14 (907 mg, 19%) as white solids.
Compound 13: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.21 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H7), 6.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H8), 6.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H, H6), 3.85 (s, 3 H, H11), 3.66 (dd, J = 10.4, 2.2 Hz, 1 H, H13), 3.33-3.15 (m, 3 H, H16-H4α), 3.31 (s, 3 H, H17), 3.17 (s, 3 H, H18), 2.94 (ddd, J = 16.1, 11.8, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, H4β), 2.73 (ddd, J = 16.2, 5.3, 3.3 Hz, 1 H, H3α), 2.44 (ddd, J = 16.2, 11.7, 6.9 Hz, 1 H, H3β), 1.70-1.45 (m, 2 H, H14), 1.43 (s, 3 H, H12), 1.35-1.20 (m, 2 H, H15) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 213.9 (C2), 156.0 (C5), 142.2 (C9), 127.1 (C7), 125.1 (C10), 120.1 (C8), 107.8 (C6), 88.4 (C13), 72.7 (C16), 61.7 (C18), 58.5 (C17), 56.2 (C1), 55.4 (C11), 37.9 (C3), 29.5 (C14), 27.0 (C15), 23.4 (C12), 21.6 (C12) ppm. IR (CHCl₃): ν = 3155, 2985, 2255, 1805, 1794, 1643, 1470, 1382, 1167, 1096, 926 cm^-1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₁₈H₂₆O₄: 306.3966; found: 329.1734 [M + Na]. Anal. Calcd for C₁₈H₂₆O₄ (%): C, 69.54; H, 7.30; O, 23.16. Found: C, 69.48; H, 7.37; O, 23.15.
Compound 14: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.21 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H7), 6.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H8), 6.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H, H6), 3.85 (s, 3 H, H11), 3.66 (dd, J = 10.4, 2.2 Hz, 1 H, H13), 3.33-3.15 (m, 3 H, H16, H4α), 3.31 (s, 3 H, H17), 3.17 (s, 3 H, H18), 2.94 (ddd, J = 16.1, 11.8, 5.5 Hz, 1 H, H4β), 2.73 (ddd, J = 16.2, 5.3, 3.3 Hz, 1 H, H3α), 2.44 (ddd, J = 16.2, 11.7, 6.9 Hz, 1 H, H3β), 1.70-1.45 (m, 2 H, H14), 1.43 (s, 3 H, H12), 1.35-1.20 (m, 2 H, H15) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 215.2 (C2), 156.1 (C5), 140.4 (C9), 126.6 (C7), 125.5 (C10), 120.6 (C8), 108.3 (C6), 88.5 (C13), 72.7 (C16), 61.2 (C18), 58.6 (C17), 56.3 (C1), 55.4 (C11), 37.8 (C3), 28.4 (C14), 26.9 (C15), 20.3 (C4), 20.2 (C12) ppm. IR (CHCl₃): ν = 3155, 2984, 2254, 1794, 1706, 1642, 1469, 1382, 1261, 1167, 1096 cm^-1.
1-(1,4-Dimethoxybutyl)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-2-methylene-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene ( 4).
To a solution of ketone 12 (3.3 g, 10.7 mmol) in THF were successively added at r.t. methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide (19.1g, 54 mmol) and potassium tert-butoxide (6 g, 54 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et₂O and washed with sat. aq NaHCO₃. The combined organic layers were washed with H₂O, brine, and dried (Na₂SO₄), and the solvent was evaporated. Flash chromatography on silica gel (elution with heptane-EtOAc, 90:10) of the residue afforded 4 (3.17g, 97%) as a white solid. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.22-7.15 (m, 2 H, H7, H8), 6.69 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.8 Hz, 1 H, H6), 5.03 (q, J = 1.3 Hz, 1 H, H19α), 4.85 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1 H, H19β), 3.82 (s, 3 H, H11), 3.39 (dd, J = 10.2, 2.0 Hz, 1 H, H13), 3.34 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H, H16), 3.31 (s, 3 H, H18), 3.17 (s, 3 H, H18), 2.95-2.80 (m, 1 H, H4α), 2.80-2.55 (m, 2 H, H3α, H4β), 2.50-2.40 (m, 1 H, H3β), 1.85-1.70 (m, 2 H, H15), 1.44 (s, 3 H, H12), 1.35-1.15 (m, 2 H, H14) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 156.3 (C5), 151.8 (C2), 143.6 (C9), 127.2 (C10), 125.9 (C7), 119.9 (C8), 109.1 (C9), 107.0 (C6), 90.8 (C13), 73.0 (C16), 61.5 (C18), 58.5 (C17), 55.4 (C11), 48.1 (C1), 32.7 (C3), 28.2 (C14), 27.2 (C15), 26.2 (C12), 24.6 (C4) ppm. Anal. Calcd for C₁₉H₂₈O₃ (%): C, 74.96; H, 9.27; O, 15.77. Found: C, 74.75; H, 9.09; O, 16.01. IR (CHCl₃): ν = 1577, 1461, 1433, 1367, 1254, 1047 cm^-1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₁₉H₂₈O₃: 304.2038; found: 327.1894 [M + Na].
1-(1,4-Dimethoxybutyl)-5-methoxy-1,2-dimethyl-1,4-dihydronaphthalene ( 15).
A solution of alkene 4 (98 mg, 0.32 mmol) in 3 mL of CH₂Cl₂ in a Schlenk apparatus was cooled at -180 °C and degassed under vacuum then filled with argon. Crabtree’s catalyst (11 mg, 0.012 mmol) was added and the solution degassed again under vacuum and filled with argon. The mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. and the Schlenk tube was linked to an hydrogenation apparatus. The system was flushed ten times with hydrogen and stirred 12 h at r.t. under an atmospheric pressure of hydrogen. The solvent was then removed under vacuum and the resulting slurry dissolved in Et₂O and filtered on a short silica pad. Chromatography on preparative TLC (elution with heptane-EtOAc, 85:15) of the residue afforded 1 (90 mg, 92%) as a colorless oil. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.27 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, 1 H, H8), 7.17 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H7), 6.71 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, H6), 5.59 (dqd, J = 2.7, 1.7, 0.6 Hz, 1 H, H3), 3.83 (s, 3 H, H11), 3.51 (s, 3 H, H18), 3.26 (s, 3 H, H18), 3.30-3.20 (m, 4 H, H4α, H13, H16), 3.08 (dq, J = 22.4, 2.6 Hz, 1 H, H4β), 1.88 (dd, J = 2.6, 1.7 Hz, 3 H, H19), 1.65-1.60 (m, 2 H, H14), 1.55 (s, 3 H, H12), 1.45-1.38 (m, 1 H, H15), 1.00-0.90 (m, 1 H, H15) ppm. ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 155.9 (C5), 141.3 (C9), 136.2 (C2), 125.9 (C7), 124.0 (C10), 122.6 (C3), 120.5 (C8), 106.9 (C6), 88.4 (C13), 73.1 (C16), 61.8 (C18), 58.5 (C17), 55.2 (C11), 47.1 (C1), 28.9 (C15), 27.2 (C14), 25.1 (C4), 23.3 (C12), 20.5 (C19). IR (CHCl₃): ν = 1582, 1462, 1423. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₁₉H₂₈O₃: 304.2038; found: 327.1950 [M + Na].