Semin Hear 2005; 26(2): 70-77
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-871005
Published in 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Real-World Performance of Directional Microphone Hearing Aids

Brian E. Walden1 , Rauna K. Surr1 , Mary T. Cord1
  • 1Army Audiology & Speech Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 May 2005 (online)

ABSTRACTS

This article summarizes several recent studies of directional microphone hearing aid performance in everyday living conducted at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. It is clear that the directional benefit typically observed in controlled clinical testing often is not realized in ordinary listening situations. This is due, at least in part, to a variety of acoustic factors frequently encountered in everyday listening environments that disrupt the effectiveness of the directional processing. As a result, patients will not detect a significant performance difference between omnidirectional and directional processing in many everyday listening situations and, as a further result, some patients fit with switchable omnidirectional/directional hearing aids will eventually opt not to use the directional mode. Nevertheless, directional microphones can provide a significant benefit to patients under certain environmental conditions and most patients learn to identify ordinary listening situations where directional processing is distinctly preferred to omnidirectional processing. This is most likely to occur when background noise is present and the signal of interest is in front of and relatively near to the listener.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;  63 533-549
  • 2 Walden B E, Surr R K, Cord M T, Edwards B, Olson L. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;  11 540-560
  • 3 Cox R M, Alexander G C, Gilmore C. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).  Ear Hear. 1987;  8(suppl) 119S-126S
  • 4 Cox R M, Alexander G C, Gilmore C, Pusakulich K M. Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners.  Ear Hear. 1988;  9 198-207
  • 5 Cord M T, Surr R K, Walden B E, Olson L. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;  13 295-307
  • 6 Surr R K, Walden B E, Cord M T, Olson L. Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;  13 308-322
  • 7 Walden B E, Surr R K, Cord M T, Dyrlund O. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;  15 365-396
  • 8 Cord M T, Surr R K, Walden B E, Dyrlund O. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;  15 353-364

Brian E WaldenPh.D. 

Army Audiology & Speech Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center

6900 Georgia Avenue, NW

Washington, DC, 20307-5001

Email: brian.walden@na.amedd.army.mil

    >