The Reliability and Validity of a Field Hockey Skill Test

Abstract

High test retest reliability is essential in tests used for both scientific research and to monitor athletic performance. Thirty-nine (20 male and 19 female) well-trained university field hockey players volunteered to participate in the study. The reliability of the in house designed test was determined by repeating the test (3 - 14 days later) following full familiarisation. The validity was assessed by comparing coaches ranks of players with ranked performance on the skill test. The mean difference and confidence limits in overall skill test performance was 0.0 ± 1.0 % and the standard error (confidence limits) was 2.1 % (1.7 to 2.8 %). The mean difference and confidence limits for the “decision making” time was 0.0 ± 1.0 % and the standard error (confidence limits) was 4.5 % (3.6 to 6.2 %). The validity correlation (Pearson) was r = 0.83 and r = 0.73 for female players and r = 0.61 and r = 0.70 for male players for overall time and “decision making” time respectively. We conclude that the field hockey skill test is a reliable measure of skill performance and that it is valid as a predictor of coach-assessed hockey performance, but the validity is greater for female players.

Key words

Intermittent exercise - team sports

References

• 1 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-238
• 2 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
• 3 Chapman N. Chapman ball control test - field hockey.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 1982;  53 239-242
• 4 Cohen L, Holliday M. Statistics for Social Scientists. London; Paul Chapman Publishing 1982
• 5 Hopkins W G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.  Sports Med. 2000;  30 1-15
• 6 Hopkins W G. How to interpret changes in an athletic performance test.  Sportscience. 2004;  8 1-7
• 7 Knapp B. Skill in Sport: The Attainment of Proficiency. London; Routledge and Kegan Paul 1963
• 8 Lakomy J, Dabinett J, Nevill M E. Physiological differences between elite male and female games players.  Faster, Higher, Stronger. 2000;  9 20-21
• 9 McGregor S. The influence of fluid ingestion on metabolism and soccer skill following intermittent high intensity shuttle running. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Loughborough, UK; Loughborough University 1999
• 10 Reilly T, Borrie A. Physiology applied to field hockey.  Sports Med. 1992;  14 10-26
• 11 Reilly T, Bretherton S. Multivariate analysis of fitness of female field hockey players. Day JAP Perspectives in Kinanthropometry. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1986: 135-142
• 12 Schmithals M, French E. Achievement tests in field hockey for college women.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 1940;  11 84-92
• 13 Strand B N, Wilson R. Assessing Sports Skills. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1993
• 14 Wessel J A, Koening F B. Field hockey. Larson LA Encyclopaedia of Sports Sciences and Medicine. London; Collier-MacMillan 1971: 679-680