Polyethylene Glycol versus Sodium Phosphate in Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: a Randomized Trial

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: There have been conflicting results regarding the adverse effects of established bowel cleansing regimens. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of three bowel cleansing regimens on subjective well-being, electrolyte balance, cardiac arrhythmia, and the microscopic post-cleansing appearance of the colonic mucosa.
Patients and Methods: A total of 231 consecutive outpatients were randomly assigned to receive bowel preparation for colonoscopy with either 4 l polyethylene glycol (PEG; group I, n = 76); 2 l PEG plus 10 mg Bisacodyl (group II, n = 71); or 90 ml sodium phosphate (group III, n = 84). After bowel preparation, the participants completed a questionnaire on symptoms. Endoscopists blinded to the regimen used gave scores for the quality of cleansing at endoscopy, ranging from poor (0) to very good (5). Blood samples were taken before and after bowel cleansing, electrocardiographic monitoring was used during colonoscopy, and mucosal biopsy samples were taken in the sigmoid colon.
Results: Bowel preparation in group II was poorer (mean score 3.26) than in groups I (3.88) and III (4.01); P < 0.001 (II vs. III), P < 0.001 (I vs. II). The frequency of arrhythmias and post-cleansing mucosal inflammation was similar in all three groups. Lower serum potassium and higher serum phosphate concentrations were found in group III in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: No differences were detected regarding the effectiveness and safety of bowel preparation with PEG alone and sodium phosphate in individuals without cardiac, renal, or hepatic failure, despite a significantly stronger alteration of the electrolyte balance with sodium phosphate.

References

• 1 Clarkston W K, Tsen T N, Dies D F. et al . Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective comparison.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 42-48
• 2 Bujanda L, Munoz C, Sanchez C. et al . Tolerance and colon cleansing with two preparations: polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate.  Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;  24 9-12
• 3 Seinelä L, Pehkonen E, Laasanen T, Ahvenainen J. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in very old patients.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  38 216-220
• 4 Hsu C W, Imperiale T F. Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 276-282
• 5 Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 100-104
• 6 Golub R W, Kerner B A, Wise W E. et al . Colonoscopic bowel preparation: which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 594-599
• 7 Cohen S M, Wexner S D, Binderow S R. et al . Prospective, randomized endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;  37 689-696
• 8 Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R. et al . A randomized, blinded prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01).  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 300-304
• 9 Raymond J M, Beyssac R, Capdenat E. et al . Tolerance, effectiveness, and acceptability of sulphate-free electrolyte lavage solution for colon cleansing before colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 555-558
• 10 Goldberg P A, Madden M V, Wright J P. et al . A study of a new osmotic purgative for colonoscopy. Is GoLytely worth its salt?.  Surg Endosc. 1995;  9 329-331
• 11 Tooson J D, Gates L K . Bowel preparation before colonoscopy: choosing the best lavage regimen.  Postgrad Med. 1996;  100 203-4, 207-12, 214
• 12 Kark W, Krebs-Richter H, Hotz J. Improving the effect of orthograde colonic lavage with GoLytely solution by adding dimethicone; in German.  Z Gastroenterol. 1995;  33 20-23
• 13 Di Palma J A, Brady C E, Pierson W P. Colon cleansing: acceptance by older patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1986;  81 652-655
• 14 Sharma V K, Chockalingham S K, Ugheoke E A. et al . Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 167-171
• 15 Sharma V K, Steinberg E N, Vasudeva R, Howden C W. Randomized, controlled study of pretreatment with magnesium citrate on the quality of colonoscopy preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 541-543
• 16 Chan A, Depew W, Vanner S. Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: pitfalls and complications.  Can J Gastroenterol. 1997;  11 334-338
• 17 Lieberman D A, Ghormley J, Flora K. Effect of oral sodium phosphate colon preparation on serum electrolytes in patients with normal serum creatinine.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 467-469
• 18 Di Palma J A, Buckley S E, Warner B A, Culpepper R M. Biochemical effects of oral sodium phosphate.  Dig Dis Sci. 1996;  41 749-753
• 19 Vanner S J, MacDonald P H, Paterson W G. et al . A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (GoLytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 422-427
• 20 Ahmed M, Raval P, Buganza G. Oral sodium phosphate catharsis and acute renal failure.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1261-1262
• 21 Zwas F R, Cirillo N W, el-Serag H B, Eisen R N. Colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with oral sodium phosphate solution.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 524-528
• 22 Oliveira L, Wexner S D, Daniel N. et al . Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized surgeon-blinded trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based oral lavage solutions.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 585-591