Surgical Outcome of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in 100 Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present the surgical outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). One hundred and thirty-one procedures (36 right hands, 33 left hands and 31 bilateral hands) of single portal ECTR were performed upon 100 patients (age range: 36 - 77 years, mean age: 52.9 years; 98 women and 2 men) with electrodiagnostically proven CTS for 2.5 years from 2001. Preoperative clinical severity and results of electrodiagnostic studies were compared with surgical outcomes at the minimal 3-month postoperative period. Among 131 cases 125 (95.4 %) with complete or significant relief of symptoms were satisfied and 6 (4.6 %) with partial or no relief of symptoms were dissatisfied. There were 2 cases of major complications (one with ulnar nerve injury and the other with ulnar artery injury) that developed in our early experience of ECTR and 1 case of recurrence. The grade of electrodiagnostic abnormalities was associated with surgical outcome but there was no statistical significance between them. The severity of clinical findings, age at onset and symptom duration were not correlated with surgical outcome. In conclusion, ECTR surgery was effective in relieving the symptoms of CTS with a low complication rate after the learning curve period. Thus, ECTR can be an alternative to the traditional open surgery and can be the first procedure for CTS with several advantages over open methods.

Carpal tunnel syndrome - endoscopic carpal tunnel release - outcome - minimally invasive surgery

References

• 1 Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Takatori Y, Ugawa Y. Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arthroscopy. 1989;  5 11-18
• 2 Filippi R, Reisch R, EI-Shki D, Grunert P. Uniportal endoscopic surgery of carpal tunnel syndrome: technique and clinical results.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;  45 78-83
• 3 Hasegawa K, Hashizume H, Senda M, Kawai A, Inoue H. Evaluation of release surgery for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic versus open method.  Acta Med Okayama. 1999;  53 179-183
• 4 Jimenez D F, Gibbs S R, Clapper A T. Endoscopic treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  88 817-826
• 5 Nagle D J. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  Hand Clin. 2002;  18 307-313
• 6 Okada M, Tsubata O, Yasumoto S, Toda N, Matsumoto T. Clinical study of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: Open versus endoscopic technique.  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2000;  8 19-25
• 7 Trumble T E, Diao E, Abrams R A, Gilbert-Anderson M M. Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial.  J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;  84 1107-1115
• 8 Trumble T E, Gilbert M, McCallister W V. Endoscopic versus open surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;  12 255-266
• 9 Menon J. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a single-portal technique.  Contemp Orthop. 1993;  26 109-116
• 10 Hirooka T, Hashizume H, Senda M, Nagoshi M, Inoue H, Nagashima H. Adequacy and long-term prognosis of endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  Acta Med Okayama. 1999;  53 39-44
• 11 Stevens J C. AAEM minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve. 1997;  20 1477-1486
• 12 Botte M J, Schroeder H P von, Abrams R A, Gellman H. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.  Hand Clin. 1996;  12 731-743
• 13 Strasberg S R, Novak C B, Mackinnon S E, Murray J F. Subjective and employment outcome following secondary carpal tunnel surgery.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 485-489
• 14 Concannon M J, Brownfield M L, Puckett C L. The incidence of recurrence after endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 1662-1665
• 15 Forman D L, Watson H K, Caulfield K A, Shenko J, Caputo A E, Ashmead D. Persistent or recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome following prior endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;  23 1010-1014
• 16 Shenko J, Watson H K, Forman D, Caulfield K. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome following prior endoscopic carpal tunnel release (Abstract). American Society for Surgery of the Hand, 52nd Annual Meeting. 1997
• 17 Nygaard O P, Trumpy J H, Mellgren S I. Recovery of sensory function after surgical decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Acta Neurol Scand. 1996;  94 253-257
• 18 Kiymaz N, Cirak B, Tuncay I, Demir O. Comparing open surgery with endoscopic releasing in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;  45 228-230
• 19 Schnek R R. The role of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Adv Plas Reconstr Surg. 1995;  11 17-43
• 20 Brief R, Brief L P. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: report of 146 cases.  Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;  67 274-277
• 21 Serra L, Panagiotopoulos K, Bucciero A, Mehrabi F K, Pescatore G, Santangelo M, Vizioli L. Endoscopic release in carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of clinical results in 200 cases.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2003;  46 11-15
• 22 Straub T A. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective analysis of factors associated with unsatisfactory results.  Arthroscopy. 1999;  15 269-274
• 23 Harris C M, Tanner E, Goldstein M, Pttee D S. The surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome correlated with preoperative nerve conduction studies.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1979;  61 193-198
• 24 Ueno H, Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Fuchigami Y, Fujimoto H, Kawai S. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release and nerve conduction studies.  Int Orthop. 2001;  24 361-363
• 25 Glowacki K A, Breen C J, Sachar K, Weiss A P. Electrodiagnostic testing and carpal tunnel syndromes outcome.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1996;  21 117-121