Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004; 8(2): 157-166
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829487
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

CT Arthrography and Postoperative Musculoskeletal Imaging with Multichannel Computed Tomography

Joshua M. Farber1
  • 1Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 June 2004 (online)

Multichannel computed tomography (MCCT) allows for rapid, thin slice acquisition and the ability to generate high mAs. This combination of features makes the modality ideal for MCCT arthrography, which requires thin, overlapping slices for robust reformatted images, and for imaging in the presence of orthopedic hardware, which necessitate high mAs. This article will explore these uses of MCCT.

SUGGESTED READINGS

  • 1 Farber J M. CT Arthrography and Postoperative Musculoskeletal Imaging with Current Multichannel Computed Tomography Systems. Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Musculoskeletal Imaging-Exploring New Limits. 89th Annual Proceeding of RSNA Chicago; December 2003: 199-126
  • 2 White L M, Schweitzer M E, Weishaupt D et al.. Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography.  Radiology. 2002;  222(2) 421-429
  • 3 Vande Berg B C, Lecouvet F E, Poilvache P et al.. Spiral CT arthrography of the postoperative knee.  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2002;  6(1) 47-55
  • 4 Berland L L, Smith J K. Mutitedetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities.  Radiology. 1998;  299 327-329
  • 5 VandeBerg B C, Lecouvet F E, Poilvache P et al.. Dual-detector spiral CT arthrography of the knee: accuracy for detection of meniscal abnormalities and unstable meniscal tears.  Radiology. 2000;  216 851-857
  • 6 Zeitoun F, Dumontier C, Dubert T et al.. Arthrography and computed tomography arthrography of the wrist.  Ann Radiol. 1997;  40(2) 78-91
  • 7 Buckwalter K A, Rydberg J, Kopecky K et al.. Musculoskeletal imaging with multislice CT.  Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  176 979-986
  • 8 Rydberg J, Buckwalter K A, Caldemeyer K S et al.. Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications.  Radiographics. 2000;  20 1787-1806
  • 9 Link T M, Berning W, Scherf S et al.. CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;  24(1) 165-172
  • 10 Fishman E K, Magid D, Robertson D D et al.. Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction.  Radiology. 1986;  160 675-681
  • 11 Wang G, Frei T, Vannier M. Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT.  Acad Radiol. 2000;  7 607-614
  • 12 Laurent D, Wasvary J, Sun D et al.. Qualitative In Vivo Assessments of Articular Cartilage in the Rabbit Knee with High-Resolution MRI at 3 T. Tenth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of ISMRM. Honolulu, HI; May 2002
  • 13 Regatte R R, Akella S VS, Borthakur A et al.. In Vivo Proton 3D-T1p-Relaxation Mapping of Human Knee. Tenth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of ISMRM Honolulu, HI; May 2002
  • 14 Weissman B N. Imaging of total hip replacement.  Radiology. 1997;  202(3) 611-623
  • 15 Aliabadi P, Tumeh S S, Weissman B N, McNeil B J. Cemented total hip prosthesis: radiographic and scintigraphic evaluation.  Radiology. 1989;  173(1) 203-206

Joshua M FarberM.D. 

550 North University Blvd., Department of Radiology, Indiana University Medical Center

Room 0615, Indianapolis, IN 46202

    >