Download PDF
Orthopedic Trauma Directions 2004; 2(1): 17-24
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829205

Femoral shaft fractures

Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 June 2004 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

It appears that unreamed nailing is significantly faster (operative time) with less blood loss compared with unreamed nailing in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures; however, reamed nailing contributes to faster union times and fewer delayed unions. Neither appears to significantly increase the risk of other complications including pulmonary compromise. Functional outcomes cannot be determined.

  • 1 Klein M et al.. 1990;  Reaming versus non-reaming in medullary nailing: interference with cortical circulation of the canine tibia.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 109 314-316
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Heim D, Schlegel U, Perren S. 1993;  Intramedullary pressure in reamed and unreamed nailing of the femur and tibia-an in vitro study in intact human bones.  Injury. 24 (Suppl. 3) 56-64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Wenda K et al.. 1993;  Pathogenesis and clinical relevance of bone marrow embolism in medullary nailing: demonstrated by intraoperative echocardiography.  Injury. 24 (Suppl.3) 73-81
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Melcher GA et al.. 1995;  Influence of reaming versus nonreaming in intramedullary nailing on local infection rate. Experimental investigation in rabbits.  J Trauma. 39 1123-1128
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Runkel M et al.. 1994;  Knochenheilung nach unaufgebohrter Marknagelung.  Unfallchirurg. 97 1-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar