Semin Plast Surg 2004; 18(2): 131-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829047
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Breast Reconstruction and Psychosocial Adjustment: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Go from Here?

Patricia A. Parker1
  • 1Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 June 2004 (online)

For women with breast cancer, there are many treatment options, with surgery often the primary treatment for early-stage disease. An increasing number of women are choosing to have reconstruction following their mastectomies. Both surgical and medical treatments for breast cancer are increasingly evaluated not only on the basis of their safety and medical outcomes but also their impact on women's psychosocial and quality of life (QOL). The objective of this article is to describe current knowledge regarding the psychosocial adjustment of women undergoing reconstruction, identify limitations in the existing literature, and offer suggestions for the direction of future work in this area. Though most studies have found comparable general QOL in women who have different surgical treatments for breast cancer, some research suggests that reconstruction may provide benefits in terms of body image and sexuality, especially compared with women who have mastectomies only. Most of the existing studies have failed to consider the potential importance of demographic- and treatment-related variables on women's psychosocial adjustment. As reconstruction procedures continue to be developed and refined, the impact of these procedures on women's short- and long-term psychosocial adjustment and QOL is needed.

REFERENCES

  • 1 American Cancer Society .Cancer Facts and Figures 2003. New York; American Cancer Society 2003
  • 2 Alderman A K, McMahon Jr L, Wilkins E G. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 695-703
  • 3 American Society of Plastic Surgeons .2000/2001/2002 National Plastic Surgery Statistics. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/public_education. Accessed April 30, 2004
  • 4 Handel N. Current status of breast reconstruction after mastectomy.  Oncology (Huntingt). 1991;  5 73-84
  • 5 Cocquyt V F, Blondeel P N, Depypere H T et al.. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment.  Br J Plast Surg. 2003;  56 462-470
  • 6 Harcourt D M, Rumsey N J, Ambler N R et al.. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 1060-1068
  • 7 Wilkins E G, Cederna P S, Lowery J C et al.. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  106 1014-1025
  • 8 Bartelink H, van Dam F, van Dongen J. Psychological effects of breast conserving therapy in comparison with radical mastectomy.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physiol. 1985;  11 381-385
  • 9 Fallowfield L J, Hall A, Maguire G P, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.  BMJ. 1990;  301 575-580
  • 10 Ganz P A, Schag A C, Lee J J, Polinsky M L, Tan S J. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?.  Cancer. 1992;  69 1729-1738
  • 11 Kiebert G M, de Haes J C, van de Velde C J. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review.  J Clin Oncol. 1991;  9 1059-1070
  • 12 Hartl K, Janni W, Kastner R et al.. Impact of medical and demographic factors on long-term quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients.  Ann Oncol. 2003;  14 1064-1071
  • 13 Shimozuma K, Ganz P A, Petersen L, Hirji K. Quality of life in the first year after breast cancer surgery: rehabilitation needs and patterns of recovery.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999;  56 45-57
  • 14 Janni W, Rjosk D, Dimpfl T H et al.. Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer-long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;  8 542-548
  • 15 Poulsen B, Graversen H, Beckman J, Blichert-Toft M. A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997;  23 327-334
  • 16 Kissane D W, Clarke D M, Ikin J et al.. Psychological morbidity and quality of life in Australian women with early-stage breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.  Med J Aust. 1998;  169 192-196
  • 17 Wellisch D K, DiMatteo R, Silverstein M et al.. Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapies: lumpectomy versus mastectomy.  Psychosomatics. 1989;  30 365-373
  • 18 Rowland J H, Desmond K A, Meyerowitz B E, Belin T R, Wyatt G E, Ganz P A. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;  92 1422-1429
  • 19 Rowland J H, Dioso J, Holland J C, Chaglassian T, Kinne D. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: who seeks it, who refuses?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95 812-822 , discussion 823
  • 20 Nissen M J, Swenson K K, Ritz L J, Farrell J B, Sladek M L, Lally R M. Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures.  Cancer. 2001;  91 1238-1246
  • 21 Al-Ghazal S K, Fallowfield L, Blamey R W. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction.  Eur J Cancer. 2000;  36 1938-1943
  • 22 Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen B L. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;  68 697-709
  • 23 Pusic A, Thompson T A, Kerrigan C L et al.. Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 1325-1333
  • 24 Mock V. Body image in women treated for breast cancer.  Nurs Res. 1993;  42 153-157
  • 25 Reaby L L. Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 1810-1818
  • 26 Al-Ghazal S K, Sully L, Fallowfield L, Blamey R W. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;  26 17-19
  • 27 Harcourt D, Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: a review of the literature.  J Adv Nurs. 2001;  35 477-487
  • 28 Schain W S, Wellisch D K, Pasnau R O, Landsverk J. The sooner the better: a study of psychological factors in women undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction.  Am J Psychiatry. 1985;  142 40-46
  • 29 Cederna P S, Yates W R, Chang P, Cram A E, Ricciardelli E J. Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1995;  35 458-468
  • 30 Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 1142-1153
  • 31 Kroll S S, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  90 455-462
  • 32 Serletti J M, Moran S L. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1418-1424
  • 33 Anderson S G, Rodin J, Ariyan S. Treatment considerations in postmastectomy reconstruction: their relative importance and relationship to patient satisfaction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  33 263-270
  • 34 Franchelli S, Leone M S, Berrino P et al.. Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using two different methods: autologous tissues versus prostheses.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95 1213-1218
  • 35 Kroll S S, Evans G R, Reece G P et al.. Comparison of resource costs of free and conventional TRAM flap breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;  98 74-77
  • 36 Gendy R K, Able J A, Rainsbury R M. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 433-439
  • 37 Arora N K, Gustafson D H, Hawkins R P et al.. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: a prospective study.  Cancer. 2001;  92 1288-1298
  • 38 Ganz P A, Rowland J H, Desmond K, Meyerowitz B E, Wyatt G E. Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning.  J Clin Oncol. 1998;  16 501-514
  • 39 Rogers M, Kristjanson L J. The impact on sexual functioning of chemotherapy-induced menopause in women with breast cancer.  Cancer Nurs. 2002;  25 57-65
  • 40 Ganz P A. Sexual functioning after breast cancer: a conceptual framework for future studies.  Ann Oncol. 1997;  8 105-107
  • 41 Dorval M, Maunsell E, Descenes L, Brisson J. Type of mastectomy and quality of life for long term breast carcinoma survivors.  Cancer. 1998;  83 2130-2138
  • 42 Girotto J A, Schreiber J, Nahabedian M Y. Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life.  Ann Plast Surg. 2003;  50 572-578
  • 43 Taylor K L, Lamdan R M, Siegel J E, Shelby R, Hrywna M, Moran-Klimi K. Treatment regimen, sexual attractiveness concerns and psychological adjustment among African American breast cancer patients.  Psychooncology. 2002;  11 505-517
  • 44 Maguire P. Improving communication with cancer patients.  Eur J Cancer. 1999;  35 1415-1422
  • 45 Roberts C S, Cox C E, Reintgen D S, Baile W F, Gibertinin M. Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients' psychologic adjustment and decision-making.  Cancer. 1994;  74 336-341
  • 46 Jefford M, Tattersall M HN. Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care.  Lancet Oncol. 2002;  3 629-637
  • 47 Butow P N, Brown R F, Cogar S, Tattersall M H, Dunn S M. Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues.  Psychooncology. 2002;  11 47-58
  • 48 Arora N K, Johnson P, Gustafson D H, McTavish F, Hawkins R P, Pingree S. Barriers to information access, perceived health competence, and psychological health outcomes: test of a mediation model in a breast cancer sample.  Patient Educ Couns. 2002;  47 37-46
  • 49 Street R L, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life.  Med Decis Making. 1997;  17 298-306
  • 50 Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making.  BMJ. 1999;  319 766-769
  • 51 Baker C, Johnson N, Nelson J et al.. Perspective on reconstruction after mastectomy.  Am J Surg. 2002;  183 562-565
  • 52 Charavel M, Bremond A, Moumjid-Ferdjaoui N, Mignotte H, Carrere M O. Shared decision-making in question.  Psychooncology. 2001;  10 93-102
  • 53 Silliman R A, Dukes K A, Sullivan L M, Kaplan S H. Breast cancer care in older women: sources of information, social support, and emotional health outcomes.  Cancer. 1998;  83 706-711
  • 54 Nissen M J, Swenson K K, Kind E A. Quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction.  Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;  29 547-553
  • 55 Sepucha K R, Belkora J K, Mutchnick S, Esserman L J. Consultation planning to help breast cancer patients prepare for medical consultations: Effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians.  J Clin Oncol. 2002;  20 2695-2700
  • 56 Polsky D, Keating N L, Weeks J C, Schulman K A. Patient choice of breast cancer treatment: impact on health state preferences.  Med Care. 2002;  40 1068-1079
  • 57 Keating N L, Weeks J C, Borbas C, Guadagnoli E. Treatment of early stage breast cancer: do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed?.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;  79 225-231
  • 58 Wanzel K R, Brown M H, Anastakis D J, Regehr G. Reconstructive breast surgery: referring physician knowledge and learning needs.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 1441-1450
  • 59 Eley J W, Hill H A, Chen V W et al.. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study.  JAMA. 1994;  272 947-954
  • 60 Caffo O, Amichetti M, Ferro A, Lucenti A, Valduga F, Galligioni E. Pain and quality of life after surgery for breast cancer.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;  80 39-48
  • 61 Beaulac S M, McNair L A, Scott T E, LaMorte W W, Kavanah M T. Lymphedema and quality of life in survivors of early-stage breast cancer.  Arch Surg. 2002;  137 1253-1257
  • 62 Stanton A L, Danoff-Burg S, Huggins M E. The first year after breast cancer diagnosis: hope and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment.  Psychooncology. 2002;  11 93-102

Patricia A ParkerPh.D. 

Department of Behavioral Science, Unit 243, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

1515 Holcombe Blvd.

Houston, TX 77030

    >