Duodenal Versus Jejunal Biopsies in Suspected Celiac Disease

Background and Study Aims: In the past, small-bowel biopsies for diagnosis of celiac disease were taken from the jejunum with a suction capsule, but nowadays most physicians take endoscopic biopsies from the distal duodenum. To validate that practice we compared the diagnostic yield of endoscopic duodenal biopsies with that of endoscopic jejunal biopsies. In addition, we describe a method of orienting biopsy specimens optimally.
Patients and Methods: Upper endoscopy was performed with a colonoscope. Four jejunal and four duodenal biopsies were taken and oriented immediately thereafter. The pathologist rated the orientation as poor, adequate, or good, and histopathological results were expressed according to the Marsh classification. Jejunal and duodenal biopsy results were compared.
Results: 146 patients were included. Jejunal biopsies were taken in 142 patients, and Marsh I-II lesions were found in 56 and Marsh III lesions in 15 patients. In three patients duodenal biopsies were normal while jejunal biopsies showed Marsh I-II lesions. No discrepancies were found in patients with Marsh III lesions. Orientation was good in all biopsies.
Conclusion: Duodenal biopsies are sufficient to diagnose full-blown celiac disease (Marsh III), but Marsh I-II lesions may be missed in some cases.

References

• 1 Walker-Smith J A, Guandalini S, Schmitz J. et al . Revised criteria for diagnosis of celiac disease. Report of the Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.  Arch Dis Child. 1990;  65 909-911
• 2 When is a coeliac a coeliac? Report of a working group of the United European Gastroenterology Week in Amsterdam, 2001. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001 13: 1123-1128
• 3 Mäki M, Collin P. Coeliac disease.  Lancet. 1997;  349 1755-1759
• 4 Parnell N DJ, Ciclitira P J. Review article: coeliac disease and its management.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;  13 1-13
• 5 Hankey G L, Holmes G KT. Coeliac disease in the elderly.  Gut. 1994;  35 65-67
• 6 Marsh M N. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (celiac sprue).  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 330-354
• 7 Wahab P J, Crusius B A, Meijer J WR. et al . Gluten challenge in borderline gluten-sensitive enteropathy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 1464-1469
• 8 Kaukinen K, Mäki M, Partanen J. et al . Celiac disease without villous atrophy. Revision of criteria called for.  Dig Dis Sci. 2001;  46 879-887
• 9 Day D W, Jass J R, Sheperd N A. et al .Malnutrition, maldigestion and malabsorption. In: Day DW, Jass JR, Price AB, et al. (eds) Morson and Dawson’s gastrointestinal pathology. 4th edn. Oxford; Blackwell Science 2003: 324-339
• 10 Wärngård O, Stenhammer L, Ascher H. et al . Small bowel biopsy in Swedish paediatric clinics.  Acta Paediatr. 1996;  85 240-241
• 11 Mee A S, Burke M, Vallon A G. et al . Small bowel biopsy for malabsorption: comparison of the diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic forceps and capusle biopsy specimens.  Br Med J. 1985;  291 769-772
• 12 Branski D, Faber J, Freier S. et al . Histologic evaluation of endoscopic versus suction biopsies of small intestinal mucosae in children with and without celiac disease.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;  27 6-11
• 13 Linaker B D, Calam J. Jejunal biopsy with the Watson capsule and perforation in the elderly.  Gastroenterology. 1978;  75 723-725
• 14 Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standarized report scheme for pathologists.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  11 1185-1194
• 15 Abdulkarim A S, Burgart L J, See J. et al . Etiology of nonresponsive celiac disease: results of a systemic approach.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 2016-2021
• 16 Holdstock G, Eade O E, Isaacson P. et al . Endoscopic duodenal biopsies in coeliac disease and duodenitis.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1979;  14 717-720
• 17 Granot E, Goodman-Weill M, Pizov G. et al . Histological comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic small intestinal mucosal biopsies in children.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993;  16 397-401
• 18 Achkar E, Carey W D, Petras R. et al . Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 278-281
• 19 Scott B B, Jenkins D. Endoscopic small intestinal biopsy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1981;  27 62-167
• 20 Wahab P J, Meijer J WR, Mulder C JJ. Small intestinal biopsies in coeliac disease: duodenal or jejunal?.  Virchows Arch. 2003;  442 124-128
• 21 Vogelsang H, Hanel S, Steiner B, Oberhuber G. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 336-340
• 22 Scott B, Holmes G. Perforation from endoscopic small bowel biopsy.  Gut. 1993;  34 134-135
• 23 Barakat M H, Ali S M, Badawi A R. et al . Peroral endoscopic duodenal biopsy in infants and children.  Acta Paediatr. 1983;  72 563-569
• 24 Saverymuttu S H, Sabbat J, Burke M. et al . Impact of endoscopic duodenal biopsy on the detection of small intestinal villous atrophy.  Postgrad Med J. 1991;  67 47-49
• 25 Goldstein N S, Underhill J. Morphologic features suggestive of gluten sensitivity in architecturally normal duodenal biopsy specimens.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;  116 63-71
• 26 Mäki M, Holm K, Koskimies S. et al . Normal small bowel biopsy followed by coeliac disease.  Arch Dis Child. 1990;  65 1137-1141
• 27 Collin P, Helin H, Mäki M. et al . Follow-up of patients positive in reticulin and gliadin antibody test with normal small bowel biopsy findings.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;  28 595-598
• 28 Corazza G R, Andreani M L, Biagi F. et al . Clinical, pathological, and antibody pattern of latent celiac disease: report of three cases.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 2203-2207
• 29 Thijs W J, van Baarlen J, Mulder C JJ. et al . Small bowel intraepithelial lymphocytosis and normal villous architecture (Marsh I): gluten sensitive enteropathy [abstract]?.  Gastroenterology. 1999;  116 A897