Endoscopy 2004; 36(11): 976-981
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825866
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Measuring Tumor Volume with Three-Dimensional Endoscopic Ultrasonography: an Experimental and Clinical Study (including video)

M.  Watanabe1 , M.  Kida1 , Y.  Yamada1 , K.  Saigenji1
  • 1Dept. of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 4 November 2003

Accepted after Revision 15 June 2004

Publication Date:
02 November 2004 (online)

Background and Study Aims: The Olympus EU-IP2 three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasound (3D-EUS) imaging system makes it possible to display tumors in three dimensions and estimate their volume.
Materials and Methods: Experimental and clinical studies of the volume estimation function of the Olympus EU-IP2 system was carried out to evaluate its accuracy and assess the extent of tumor shrinkage caused by fixation, dehydration, and staining.
Results. In the experimental studies, compared with the actual volume of a 1000-mm3 gelatin column, the estimated volume was found to be equivalent to 114 ± 1.8 % with the 3R probe and 143 ± 0.8 % with the 2R probe (mean plus or minus standard deviation). The mean estimated volume of tumor models was 127 ± 8.5 % with the 3R probe and 131 ± 6.8 % with the 2R probe. Greater distance from the probe was associated with a greater degree of error than the target object’s size, angle, or the number of traces of its outline made. In the clinical studies, compared with the histologically determined tumor volume (100 %), the mean estimated tumor volume was 178 ± 48.2 % in situ, 168 ± 31.3 % in resected specimens, and 137 ± 31.5 % after fixation. Fixation, dehydration, and staining were thus associated with tumor shrinkage.
Conclusions: The volume of gastrointestinal lesions can be estimated by 3D-EUS, although it is overestimated in comparison with actual values. 3D-EUS also allows direct comparisons to be made between the tumor volume before surgery and the volume of fixed pathological specimens, so that the rate of tumor shrinkage can be estimated.

References

  • 1 Fusaroli P, Caletti G. Endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 127-135
  • 2 Hashimoto H, Yokoyama S, Nakao K. et al . The capability of three-dimensional display during endoscopic ultrasonography.  Dig Endosc. 1991;  3 194-198
  • 3 Willis J, Cooper G S, Isenberg G. et al . Correlation of EUS measurement with pathologic assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 655-661
  • 4 Kikuchi S, Hiki Y, Sakakibara Y. et al . Measuring the tumor volume of gastric carcinoma by computer image analysis: clinical significance.  World J Surg. 2000;  24 603-607
  • 5 Kikuchi S, Sakuramoto S, Kobayashi N. et al . A new staging system based on tumor volume in gastric cancer.  Anticancer Res. 2001;  21 2933-2936
  • 6 Azuma K, Suzuki K, Katakura T. et al . Volume measurement by computed tomography (CT): fundamental study of technical errors [in Japanese with English abstract].  Danso Satsueiho Kenkyukai Zasshi. 1981;  9 1-3

M. Kida, M. D.

Dept. of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital

2-1-1 Azamizodai, Sagamihara City · Kanagawa 228-8520 · Japan

Fax: +81-42-749-8690

Email: m-kida@kitasato-u.ac.jp

    >