Research Ethics 101: The Responsible Conduct of Research
14. Januar 2004 (online)
The ethical, responsible conduct of research (RCR) is fundamental to the quality of science in our discipline, and ultimately to the advancement of knowledge. Therefore, appreciation of the basic concepts of RCR is vital to all segments of the discipline, from students to clinicians to scientists themselves. Conversely, fraud in science, or research misconduct, is diametrically opposed to the quality of science and the advancement of knowledge. This article overviews the major concepts associated with RCR as well as the kinds of behaviors that would be identified as research misconduct. Case study examples are provided for contemplation and discussion.
Responsible conduct of research - research ethics - research misconduct - scientific fraud
- 1 Teich A H, Frankel M S. Good Science and Responsible Scientists. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1992
- 2 Sheets M D. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Croatian Med J . 1999; 40 321-325
- 3 Resnik D B. The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. London: Routledge; 2001
- 4 Munck A U. Examples of scientific misconduct. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 31-33
- 5 Woolf P K. Pressure to publish and fraud in science. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 141-145
- 6 Racker E. A view of misconduct in science. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 34-42
- 7 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. J Speech Hear Res . 1969; 12 246-269
- 8 Bishop D VM, Carlyon R P, Deeks J M, Bishop S J. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1999; 42 1295-1310
- 9 Ingham R J, Kilgo M, Ingham J C, Moglia R, Belknap H, Sanchez T. Evaluation of a stuttering treatment based on reduction of short phonation intervals. J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2001; 44 1229-1244
- 10 Sackett D L, Straus S E, Richardson W S, Rosenberg W, Hayes R B. Evidence-Based Medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingston 2000
- 11 Ingham J C. Evidence-based treatment and stuttering. Presentation at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, Atlanta, GA, November 2002
- 12 Office of Research Integrity (ORI). PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). Available at: http://ori.dhhs. gov/
- 13 Kalichman M W. The online resource for instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Available at: http://rcr.ucsd.edu. Accessed February 23 2003
- 14 Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science. Federal Register 54 (August 8), 32449, codified as 42 CFR Part 50 Subpart A (1989a).
- 15 Office of Research Integrity (ORI). Federal definition not effective yet. Available at: http://ori.dhhs. gov/html/news/fedreg76260.asp. Accessed December 6 2000
- 16 Jones S M. Integrity in research. Semin Hear . 2000; 21 87-96
- 17 Dartmouth College, Committee on Sources, sources: their use and acknowledgment 1998. Available at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sources/. Accessed September 7. 1998
- 18 Bailar III J C. Science, statistics, and deception. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 113-116
- 19 The Nuremberg Code. JAMA 1996 276: 1691
- 20 World Medical Association The Helsinki Declaration: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17-c_e. html .
- 21 National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1979
- 22 Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS (1991). Protection of human subjects. Federal Register 56 (June 18), 28003; Federal Register 40 (August 8, 1975), 33528; Federal Register 43 (January 11, 1978), 1758; Federal Register 43 (November 3, 1978), 51559; Federal Register 43 (November 16, 1978) 53655; Federal Register 48 (March 8, 1983) 9818; Federal Register 56 (June 18), 28032; codified as 45 CFR Part 46 Subparts A, B, C, D. Available at: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs. gov/polasur.htm .
- 23 Emanuel E J, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical?. JAMA . 2000; 283 2701-2711
- 24 Stern J E, Lomax K. Human experimentation. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 286-306
- 25 J Speech Lang Hear Res Information for authors. 2003
- 26 Werhane P, Doering J. Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 165-192
- 27 Weil V, Arzbaecher R. Relationships in laboratories and research communities. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 69-92
- 28 Krulwich T A, Friedman P J. Integrity in the education of researchers. Acad Med . 1993; 68(suppl) S14-S19
- 29 Ringel R L. A case for the doctoral consortia model in communication sciences and disorders: less is better and may even lead to more. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders, April 2003, Albuquerque, NM.
- 30 Berger E, Gert B. Institutional responsibility. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 197-212
- 31 McCutchen C W. Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 151-160
- 32 Office of Research Integrity (ORI). Updated November 26, 2001. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/ html/misconduct/whistleblowers.asp. Accessed ???
- 33 Wenger N S, Korenman S G, Berk R, Berry S. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. J Invest Med . 1997; 45 371-380.
- 34 Time Magazine 2002 Persons of the Year December 22, 2002 .
- 35 Kalichman M W, Friedman P J. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Acad Med . 1992; 67 769-775
- 36 Eastwood S, Derish P, Leash E, Ordway S. Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Sci Eng Ethics . 1996; 2 89-114
- 37 Brown S, Kalichman M W. Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Sci Eng Ethics . 1998; 4 487-498
- 38 Amato I, Rustum R oy. PR is a better system than peer review. In: Elliott D, Stearn JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader Hanover, NH: University Press of New England 1997: 148-150
- 39 Motluk A. Cutting out stuttering. New Scientist . 1997; 153 32
- 40 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Updated October, 2001 Available at: http://www.icmje.org/
- 41 Bailey B J. What is an author?. Laryngoscope . 2001; 110 1787-1788
- 42 Pfeffer C, Olsen B R. Editorial. J Neg Results Biomed . 2002; 1
- 43 Ingham R J, Fox P T, Ingham J C. et al . Functional-lesion investigation of developmental stuttering with positron emission tomography. J Speech Hear Res . 1996; 39 1208-1227
- 44 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Code of Ethics (revised). ASHA supplement 23. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2003. Available at: http://www.professional.asha.org/resources/deskrefs/. Accessed ??? .
- 45 Tudor M. An experimental study of the effect of evaluative labeling on speech fluency. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Iowa, 1939
- 46 Dryer J. Theory improved treatment and understanding of stuttering. The San Jose Mercury News, June 11, 2001
- 47 Ambrose N G, Yairi E. The Tudor Study: Data and ethics. Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 2002; 11 190-203
- 48 Reynolds G. The stuttering doctor's “Monster Study.” New York Magazine 2003;March 16:36- 39, 83, 87, 90.