Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2004; 25(2): 120-125
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813102
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Foetal Facial Clefts: Prenatal Evaluation of Lip and Primary Palate by 2D and 3D Ultrasound

Fetale Spaltbildungen des Gesichts: Pränatale Untersuchung der Lippen und des Kiefers mittels 2D- und 3D-UltraschallC. Mittermayer1 , W. Blaicher3 , P. C. Brugger2 , G. Bernaschek3 , A. Lee3
  • 1 Department of Neonatology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria
  • 2 Department of Anatomy, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria
  • 3 Department of Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

angenommen: 18. Dezember 2002

eingereicht: 15. September 2003

Publication Date:
14 April 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction: To examine whether three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) is an accurate diagnostic method of clinical use in the ability to define the location and extent of facial clefting prenatally, compared to two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US). Methods: 18 foetuses suspected or diagnosed to suffer from a facial cleft by 2D US were examined with a targeted 3D US. 2D US and 3D US results were compared with postnatal outcome. Results: Comparison of the number of foetuses with a cleft lip + primary palate diagnosed correctly with 2D US with the results of adjunctive 3D US (true positive + true negative) showed that adjunctive 3D US correctly diagnosed more cleft lips (100 %; 15/15 foetuses vs. 66 %; 12/18 foetuses) and more cleft primary palates (100 %; 12/12 foetuses vs. 58 %; 7/12 foetuses). Conclusion: Interactive review of standardised 3D multiplanar images allows to systematically evaluate lip defects and abnormalities of the maxillary tooth-bearing alveolar ridge. The accuracy of adjunctive 3D ultrasound is superior to 2D ultrasound alone for extensive prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft primary palate.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Ist ein zusätzlich zum 2D-Ultraschall durchgeführter 3D-Ultraschall, in der Diagnose von Lippen- und Lippenkieferspalten, dem 2D-Ultraschall überlegen? Methodik: Bei 18 Feten wurde im 2D der Verdacht oder die Diagnose auf eine Spaltbildung der Lippen oder der Lippen und des Kiefers gestellt. Bei allen Feten wurde zusätzlich eine 3D-US Untersuchung durchgeführt. 2D-US und 3D-US wurden mit dem fetalen Outcome verglichen. Ergebnisse: Vergleicht man die Anzahl der Feten, bei denen eine Lippenspalte + Kieferspalte mittels 2D- vs. additivem 3D-US korrekt diagnostiziert wurde (richtig positiv + richtig negativ), so zeigt sich, dass der 3D-US mehr Lippenspalten (100 %; 15/15 Feten vs. 66 %; 12/18 Feten) und mehr Kieferspalten (100 %; 12/12 Feten vs. 58 %; 7/12 Feten) richtig diagnostizierte. Schlussfolgerung: Die zusätzliche 3D-US Untersuchung ist der alleinigen 2D-US Untersuchung, bei Lippen- und Lippenkieferspalten, überlegen. Die Möglichkeit einer standardisierten interaktiven Untersuchung erlaubt eine systematische Evaluierung der Lippen und des Kiefers.

Key words

Prenatal diagnosis - cleft lip - cleft primary palate - two-dimensional ultrasound - three-dimensional ultrasound

Schlüsselwörter

Pränatale Diagnostik - Lippenspalte - Kieferspalte - Zweidimensionaler Ultraschall - Dreidimensionaler Ultraschall

References

  • 1 Moore K L. The developing human. 4th ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1988: 195-205
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Matthews M S, Cohen M, Viglione M, Brown A S. Prenatal counseling for cleft lip and palate.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Benacerraf B R, Mulliken J B. Foetal cleft lip and palate: sonographic diagnosis and postnatal outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  92 1045-1051
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nyberg D A, Sickler G K, Hegge F N, Kramer D J, Kropp R J. Foetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: US classification and correlation with outcome.  Radiology. 1995;  195 677-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaaps J P, Defoort P, Colon R, Buekens P. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian multicentric study.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  1 102-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cash C, Set P, Coleman N. The accuracy of antenatal ultrasound in the detection of facial clefts in a low-risk screening population.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  18 432-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chen M L, Chang C H, Yu C H, Cheng Y C, Chang F M. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate by three-dimensional ultrasound.  Ultraschall Med Biol. 2001;  27 1017-1023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Johnson D D, Pretorius D H, Budorick N E, Jones M C, Lou K V, James G M, Nelson T R. Foetal cleft lip and primary palate: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional US.  Radiology. 2000;  217 236-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lee W, Kirk J S, Shaheen K W, Romero R, Hodges A N, Comstock C H. Foetal cleft lip and palate detection by three-dimensional utrasonography.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  16 314-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cleft lip and palate versus normal face multiplanar and surface rendering. http://www.univie.ac.at/obgyn/prenatale_medizin/3d1.htm 2002. 
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Anderson N, Boswell O, Duff G. Prenatal sonography for the detection of foetal anomalies: Results of prospective study and comparison with prior series.  Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  165 943-950
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gonclaves L F, Jeanty P, Piper J M. The accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting congenital anomalies.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  171 1606-1612
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stiller R, Huch A, Huch R, Zimmermann . Quality of prenatal diagnostic ultrasound - comparison of sonographically detected foetal anomalies with diagnostic findings verified post-partum in Switzerland.  Ultraschall Med. 2001;  22 225-230
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bronsthein M, Blumfeld I, Kohn J, Blumenfeld Z. Detection of cleft lip by early second-trimester transvaginal sonography.  Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  84 73-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Monni G, Olla G, Cao A, Crisponi G. Colour Doppler ultrasound and prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1995;  23 189-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ulm M R, Kratochwil A, Ulm B, Solar P, Aro G, Bernaschek G. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of foetal tooth germs.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  12 240-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pretorius D H, House M, Nelson T O, Holenbach K A. Evaluation of normal and abnormal lips in foetuses: comparison between three-dimensional and two-dimensional sonography.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  165 1233-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Merz E, Weber G, Bahlmann F, Miric-Tesanic D. Application of transvaginal and abdominal three-dimensional ultrasound for the detection or exclusion of malformations of the foetal face.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  9 237-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chmait R, Pretorius D, Jones M, Hull A, James G, Nelson T, Moore T. Prenatal evaluation of facial clefts with two-dimensional and adjunctive three-dimensional ultrasonography: A prospective trial.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  187 946-949
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Merz E, Eichhorn K H, Hansmann M, Meinel K. Quality demands on continuing differential diagnostic sonography in prenatal diagnosis (DEGUM stage II) during 18th to 22nd weeks of gestation.  Ultraschall Med. 2002;  23 11-12
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. ”Voluvision”: Three-dimensional ultrasonography of foetal malformations.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  170 1312-1314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. Three dimensional ultrasound: abnormalities of the foetal face in surface and volume rendering mode.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Apr ;  102(4) 302-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ulm M R, Kratochwil A, Ulm B, Bettelheim D, Bernaschek G. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of foetal tooth buds for characterization of facial clefts.  Early Hum Dev. 1999;  55 67-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mittermayer C, Bernaschek G, Lee A. Diagnosis of ectopia cordis with three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in first-trimester pregnancy.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  20 203-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

MD C. Mittermayer

University Hospital of Vienna · Department of Neonatology and Intensive Care

Währinger Gürtel 18-20 · 1090 Vienna · Austria ·

Phone: +43 1 40400 5572

Fax: +43 1 40400 3296

Email: christoph.mittermayer@gyn.akh.magwien.gv.at

      >