Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2003; 13(6): 345-353
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45435
Wissenschaft und Forschung
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Veränderungen des allgemeinen Gesundheitszustandes und der funktionellen Unabhängigkeit bei Patienten nach Amputationen der unteren Extremität und stationärer Rehabilitation

Changes in Health-Related Quality of and Functional Independence in Patients after Lower Limb Amputation and In-Patient Rehabilitation ProgramP.  Bak1 , W.-D.  Müller2 , B.  Bocker1 , U.  Smolenski1
  • 1Institut für Physiotherapie der FSU Jena
  • 2Fachklinik Bad Liebenstein der m & i Klinikgruppe Enzensberg
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 5. August 2003

Angenommen: 24. Oktober 2003

Publication Date:
11 December 2003 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Trotz der deutlich verbesserten Prävention und der Erfolge in der Behandlung von Risikofaktoren ist die Zahl der Amputationen der unteren Extremität in den letzten Jahren konstant geblieben. Patienten mit Amputationen verursachen erhebliche Kosten im Gesundheitswesen. Daher bleibt die Behandlung solcher Patienten eine Herausforderung für ein multidisziplinäres Rehabilitationsteam. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die kurzfristigen Veränderungen des allgemeinen Gesundheitszustandes und der funktionellen Unabhängigkeit der amputierten Patienten nach stationärer Rehabilitation zu erfassen. Methodik: Von 70 konsekutiven Patienten nach Amputationen der unteren Extremitäten wurden 64 für die Studie qualifiziert. SF-36 als Fragebogen zur Erfassung des allgemeinen Gesundheitszustandes und FIM als Fremdbeurteilung der funktionellen Selbständigkeit wurden am Anfang und am Ende einer multidisziplinären stationären Rehabilitation administriert. Acht Subdimensionen und beide Summenscores von SF-36 wurden normbasiert ausgewertet. FIM wurde sowohl als Summenscore berechnet als auch auf eine 0 - 100-Skala transformiert. Ergebnisse: Es zeigten sich positive Veränderungen in allen Subskalen und den beiden Summenscores von SF-36. In den Skalen RP, BP und RE sowie beiden Summenscores waren diese signifikant. Die funktionelle Unabhängigkeit hat sich signifikant von 69,3 FIM-Punkten auf 78,4 FIM-Punkte verbessert. Dies entspricht einer Verbesserung um 8,5 Prozentpunkte auf der transformierten Skala. Diskussion: Die Veränderungen in den physischen Subskalen von SF-36 entsprechen den Angaben in der Literatur, die mentalen Subskalen und der FIM zeigen geringere Veränderungen. Bei der Auswertung der Summenscores von SF-36 sollen die Korrelationen zwischen physischen und mentalen Konstrukten berücksichtigt werden. Die Datenlage zur kurzfristigen Änderungssensitivität der verwendeten Messinstrumente ist bisher nicht ausreichend. Die Komorbidität spielt eine erhebliche Rolle bei der Evaluation des Rehabilitationserfolges bei amputierten Patienten. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Studie zeigt positive Effekte des multidisziplinären stationären Rehabilitationsprogramms bei Patienten mit Amputationen der unteren Extremität. Langzeitstudien sind notwendig, um die Dauerwirkung der Rehabilitation zu evaluieren. Weitere Forschung soll Prädiktoren des Rehabilitationsergebnisses identifizieren, um eine optimale Behandlungsstrategie zu etablieren.

Abstract

Background: Despite improved health education and advances in medical and surgical technologies the incidence of lower extremity amputation remained relatively stable over the years. These has an immediate bearing on raising direct and indirect costs of the health care system. Thus, the lower extremity amputation population continues to be a major challenge for rehabilitation professionals. The goal of this study was to evaluate the short-term changes in health-related quality of life as well as functional independence in lower extremity amputees undergoing multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: Sixty four of seventy consecutive lower extremity amputees participated in the study. SF-36 for evaluating of the health-related quality of life and FIM as measure of the functional independence were administered on admission and at discharge from a multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program. Eight subscales and both summary scores were calculated using a norm-based scaling. Summary FIM scores were linear transformed into a 0 - 100 scale. Results: There was improvement in all subscales of SF-36. The changes in bodily pain, both role scales and both summary scores were statistically significant. The functional independence as measured by FIM improved significantly from 69.3 to 78.4 points or 8.5 percentage points on the transformed scale. Discussion: The changes in the physical scales of the SF-36 were comparable but these in the mental scales and in terms of functional independence were lower then reported elsewhere. Both orthogonal and oblique (correlated) factor scores should be used for evaluating of SF-36. Short-term responsiveness of both measurements used in the current study have not been reported conclusively yet. Co-morbidity seems to have a major impact on the results of rehabilitation programs of amputees. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated a positive effect of a multidisciplinary in-patient rehabilitation program on the health-related quality of life and the functional independence of lower extremity amputees. Long-term follow-up data are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of the rehabilitation. Predictors of rehabilitation success should be identified for optimising of rehabilitative intervention strategies.

Literatur

  • 1 Ephraim P L, Dillingham T R, Sector M, Pezzin L E, MacKenzie E J. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: A review of the literature.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;  84 (5) 747-761
  • 2 Grise M CL, Gauthiergagnon C, Martineau G G. Prosthetic Profile of People with Lower-Extremity Amputation - Conception and Design of a Follow-up Questionnaire.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1993;  74 (8) 862-870
  • 3 Stern P. The epidemiology of amputations.  Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1991;  (2) 253-261
  • 4 Ebskov B. The Danish Amputation Register 1972 - 1984.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 1986;  10 (1) 40-42
  • 5 Günster C. Häufigkeit der Amputationen der unteren Extremitäten. 2003
  • 6 Trautner C, Haastert B, Giani G, Berger M. Incidence of lower limb amputations and diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 1996;  19 (9) 1006-1009
  • 7 Standl E MG, Zimmermann R, Stiegler H. Zur Amputationshäufigkeit von Diabetikern in Deutschland (Ergebnisse einer Erhebung in zwei Landkreisen).  Diabetes und Stoffwechsel. 1996;  5 29-32
  • 8 Schiel R, Muller U A, Sprott H, Schmelzer A, Mertes B, HungerDathe W. The JEVIN trial: A population-based survey on the quality of diabetes care in Germany: 1994/1995 compared to 1989/1990.  Diabetologia. 1997;  40 (11) 1350-1357
  • 9 Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. Washington (DC); US Department of Health and Human Services 2000
  • 10 O'Brien K E, Chandramohan V, Nelson D A, Fischer J R, Stevens G, Poremba J A. Effect of a physician-directed educational campaign on performance of proper diabetic foot exams in an outpatient setting.  Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003;  18 (4) 258-265
  • 11 Schiel R, Braun A, Rillig A, Voigt U, Ross I S, Muller U A. Improvement of the quality of diabetes care - JEVIN, a population-based survey with 10-years follow-up: 1989/1990 - 1999/2000.  Diabetologia. 2001;  44 950
  • 12 Stiegler H, Standl E, Frank S, Mendler G. Failure of reducing lower extremity amputations in diabetic patients: results of two subsequent population based surveys 1990 and 1995 in Germany.  Vasa-Journal of Vascular Diseases. 1998;  27 (1) 10-14
  • 13 Ebskov B, Ebskov L. Major lower limb amputation in diabetic patients: Development during 1982 to 1993.  Diabetologia. 1996;  39 (12) 1607-1610
  • 14 Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H. Epidemiology of lower limb amputees in Southern Finland in 1995 and trends since 1984.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 1999;  23 (2) 88-92
  • 15 Ebskov B. Relative mortality and long-term survival for the non-diabetic lower limb amputee with vascular insufficiency.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 1999;  23 (3) 209-216
  • 16 Schuntermann M. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by WHO - Short summary.  Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin. 2001;  11 (6) 229-230
  • 17 Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice.  Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin. 2001;  11 (6) 231-232
  • 18 Ewert T, Cieza A, Stucki G. ICF in rehabilitation.  Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin. 2002;  12 (3) 157-162
  • 19 Stremmel C, Sittl R, Eder S. Phantom pain after major amputation - etiology, treatment and research.  Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2002;  127 (39) 2015-2020
  • 20 Schans C P van der, Geertzen J HB, Schoppen T, Dijkstra P U. Phantom pain and health-related quality of life in lower limb amputees.  Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2002;  24 (4) 429-436
  • 21 Pedrinelli A, Saito M, Coelho R F, Fontes R BV, Guarniero R. Comparative study of the strength of the flexor and extensor muscles of the knee through isokinetic evaluation in normal subjects and patients subjected to trans-tibial amputation.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2002;  26 (3) 195-205
  • 22 Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff J W, Vries J de, Goeken L N, Eisma W H. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;  84 (6) 803-811
  • 23 Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H. Predictive Factors of Functional Ability after Lower-Limb Amputation.  Annales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae. 1991;  80 (1) 36-39
  • 24 Geertzen J HB, Martina J D, Rietman H S. Lower limb amputation - Part 2: Rehabilitation - a 10 year literature review.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2001;  25 (1) 14-20
  • 25 Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Karkkainen M. Prosthetic Use and Functional and Social Outcome Following Major Lower-Limb Amputation.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 1990;  14 (2) 75-79
  • 26 Yigiter K, Sener G, Erbahceci F, Bayar K, Ulger O G, Akdogan S. A comparison of traditional prosthetic training versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation resistive gait training with trans-femoral amputees.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2002;  26 (3) 213-217
  • 27 Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson B M, Roxendal G. Standing Balance in Trans-Tibial Amputees Following Vascular-Disease or Trauma - a Comparative-Study with Healthy-Subjects.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 1994;  18 (3) 150-158
  • 28 Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson B M, Roxendal G. Gait in Male Trans-Tibial Amputees - a Comparative-Study with Healthy-Subjects in Relation to Walking Speed.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 1994;  18 (2) 68-77
  • 29 Rietman H S, Postema K, Geertzen J HB. Gait analysis in prosthetics: opinions, ideas and conclusions.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2003;  27 (1) 76-77
  • 30 Heinemann A W, Linacre J M, Wright B D, Hamilton B B, Granger C. Relationships between Impairment and Physical-Disability as Measured by the Functional Independence Measure.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1993;  74 (6) 566-573
  • 31 Granger C, Hamilton B, Keith R, Zielezny M, Tashman J. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation.  Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1986;  (1) 59-74
  • 32 Stineman M G, Goin J E, Granger C V, Fiedler R, Williams S V. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1997;  78 (9) 980-985
  • 33 Stineman M G. Measuring casemix, severity, and complexity in geriatric patients undergoing rehabilitation.  Medical Care. 1997;  35 (6) JS90-JS105
  • 34 Ottenbacher K J, Hsu Y W, Granger C V, Fiedler R C. The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1996;  77 (12) 1226-1232
  • 35 Stineman M G, Shea J A, Jette A, Tassoni C J, Ottenbacher K J, Fiedler R. et al . The functional independence measure: Tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1996;  77 (11) 1101-1108
  • 36 Dodds T A, Martin D P, Stolov W C, Deyo R A. A Validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and Its Performance among Rehabilitation Inpatients.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1993;  74 (5) 531-536
  • 37 Wright B D, Linacre J M, Smith R M, Heinemann A W, Granger C V. FIM measurement properties and rasch model details.  Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1997;  29 (4) 267-270
  • 38 Mauthe R W, Haaf D C, Hayn P, Krall J M. Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the functional independence measure.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1996;  77 (1) 10-13
  • 39 Harvey R L, Roth E J, Heinemann A W, Lovell L L, McGuire J R, Diaz S. Stroke rehabilitation: Clinical predictors of resource utilization.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1998;  79 (11) 1349-1355
  • 40 Muecke L, Shekar S, Dwyer D, Israel E, Flynn J PG. Functional Screening of Lower-Limb Amputees - a Role in Predicting Rehabilitation Outcome.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1992;  73 (9) 851-858
  • 41 Disler P B, Roy C W, Smith B P. Predicting Hours of Care Needed.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1993;  74 (2) 139-143
  • 42 Wilkerson D L, Batavia A I, Dejong G. Use of Functional Status Measures for Payment of Medical Rehabilitation Services.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1992;  73 (2) 111-120
  • 43 Harada N, Sofaer S, Kominski G. Functional Status Outcomes in Rehabilitation - Implications for Prospective Payment.  Medical Care. 1993;  31 (4) 345-357
  • 44 Harada N, Kominski G, Sofaer S. Development of a Resource-Based Patient Classification Scheme for Rehabilitation.  Inquiry-the Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing. 1993;  30 (1) 54-63
  • 45 Gandek B, Ware J E, Aaronson N K, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bjorner J. et al . Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: Results from the IQOLA Project.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;  51 (11) 1149-1158
  • 46 Bullinger M. Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey.  Rehabilitation Stuttg. 1996;  35 (3) XVII-XXVII
  • 47 Meikle B, Devlin M, Garfinkel S. Interruptions to amputee rehabilitation.  Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2002;  83 (9) 1222-1228
  • 48 Bak R, Strohbach H, Venbrocks R A, Smolenski U. Generic and specific health-related quality of life at short-term follow-up after total hip arthroplasty and inpatient rehabilitation program.  Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin. 2001;  11 (4) 129-132
  • 49 Pandian G, Kowalske K. Daily functioning of patients with an amputated lower extremity.  Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1999;  (361) 91-97
  • 50 Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1993
  • 51 Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston, MA; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1994
  • 52 Wilson D, Parsons J, Tucker G. The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions.  Sozial- und Präventivmedizin. 2000;  45 (6) 239-246
  • 53 Lange C, Heuft G, Wertz H H. Influence of psychic comorbidity on the treatment process of patients with diabetic foot ulcer.  Orthopäde. 2003;  32 (3) 241-246
  • 54 Uzun O, Yildiz C, Ates A, Cansever A, Atesalp A S. Depression in men with traumatic lower part amputation: A comparison to men with surgical lower part amputation.  Military Medicine. 2003;  168 (2) 106-109
  • 55 Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M. Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores?.  Quality of Life Research. 2001;  10 (5) 395-404
  • 56 Simon G E, Revicki D A, Grothaus L, Vonkorff M. SF-36 summary scores - Are physical and mental health truly distinct?.  Medical Care. 1998;  36 (4) 567-572
  • 57 Ware J E, Kosinski M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: A response.  Quality of Life Research. 2001;  10 (5) 405-413
  • 58 Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: A response - Reply.  Quality of Life Research. 2001;  10 (5) 415-420
  • 59 Taft C, Karlsson J, Persson L O, Steen B, Sullivan M. Self-rated health in 70 year old men and women. Clinical relevance of profiles and summary scores of the SF-36 (IQOLA).  Quality of Life Research. 1997;  6 (7 - 8) 381
  • 60 Wagner A K, Gandek B, Aaronson N K, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G. et al . Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;  51 (11) 925-932
  • 61 Ware J E, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson N K, Apolone G, Brazier J. et al . The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;  51 (11) 1167-1170
  • 62 Bak P, Strohbach H, Venbrocks R A, Smolenski U C. Veränderungssensitivität von SF-36 und WOMAC bei Patienten nach Hüft-TEP-Implantation und stationärer Rehabilitation.  Phys Med Rehab Kuror. 2001;  11 (4) 139
  • 63 Bruins M, Geertzen J HB, Groothoff J W, Schoppen T. Vocational reintegration after a lower limb amputation: a qualitative study.  Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2003;  27 (1) 4-10
  • 64 Frykberg R G, Arora S, Pomposelli F B, LoGerfo F. Functional outcome in the elderly following lower extremity amputation.  Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 1998;  37 (3) 181-185; discussion 261
  • 65 Pernot H FM, Witte L P de, Lindeman E, Cluitmans J. Daily functioning of the lower extremity amputee: An overview of the literature.  Clinical Rehabilitation. 1997;  11 (2) 93-106
  • 66 Pezzin L E, Dillingham T R, MacKenzie E J. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations.  Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2000;  81 (3) 292-300
  • 67 Dougherty P J. Long-term follow-up study of bilateral above-the-knee amputees from the Vietnam War.  Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume. 1999;  81 (10) 1384-1390
  • 68 Dougherty P J. Long-term follow-up of unilateral transfemoral amputees from the Vietnam War.  Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care. 2003;  54 (4) 718-723
  • 69 Nissen S J, Newman W P. Factors Influencing Reintegration to Normal Living after Amputation.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1992;  73 (6) 548-551
  • 70 Cruts H. Cardiac condition and the success of rehabilitation programs in the treatment of amputees [dissertation]. Enschede; Technical University Twente 1986
  • 71 Dove H G, Duncan I, Robb A. A prediction model for targeting low cost, high-risk members of managed care organizations.  American Journal of Managed Care. 2003;  9 (5) 381-389
  • 72 Heinemann A W, Billeter J, Betts H B. Prospective Payment for Acute Care - Impact on Rehabilitation Hospitals.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1988;  69 (8) 614-618
  • 73 Fletcher D D, Andrews K L, Hallett J W, Butters M A, Rowland C M, Jacobsen S J. Trends in rehabilitation after amputation for geriatric patients with vascular disease: Implications for future health resource allocation.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002;  83 (10) 1389-1393
  • 74 Stier-Jarmer M, Pientka L, Stucki G. Early rehabilitation in geriatrics.  Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin. 2002;  12 (4) 190-202
  • 75 Chen C C, Heinemann A W, Granger C V, Linn R T. Functional gains and therapy intensity during subacute rehabilitation: A study of 20 facilities.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002;  83 (11) 1514-1523

Dr. med. Pawel Bak

Institut für Physiotherapie · Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Kollegiengasse 9

07740 Jena

Email: pbak@med.uni-jena.de

    >