Abstract
Objective: Locally advanced prostate carcinoma frequently causes lower urinary tract symptoms
and is a clinical challenge when radiation and/or hormone therapy fail. We investigated
whether cystoprostatectomy with urinary diversion benefits patients with locally advanced
prostate carcinoma in terms of quality of life and prognostic outcome. Patients and Methods: Between 1989 and 2001, we performed 15 cystoprostatectomies for stage C-D1 prostate
carcinoma with bladder neck involvement. Of these patients, 5 underwent ileal conduit,
8 rectal bladder, 1 Koch pouch, and 1 ureterocutaneostomy. All the patients received
neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant hormonal therapy. In the same period, 28 patients underwent
retropubic prostatectomies and 15 patients received hormone therapy alone for stage
C-Dl disease. These patients were included as references. Results: Lower urinary tract symptoms caused by bladder involvement were controlled well until
the end of follow-up for all the patients in the cystoprostatectomy group. There was
no statistically significant difference in QOL score assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30
questionnaire between the prostatectomy group and the cystoprostatectomy group, while
that in the hormone therapy group was lower than those in the surgery groups. There
was no statistically significant difference in 5-year PSA-relapse-free survival among
cystoprostatectomy, prostatectomy, and hormone therapy groups. Patients in the hormone
therapy group died earlier than those in the prostatectomy group (p = 0.02), while
those in the cystoprostatectomy group did not. Conclusion: These results suggest that total cystoprostatectomy with urinary diversion is a valid
option, in terms of disease control and QOL, for prostate cancer patients whose tumor
is infiltrating into the bladder.
Key words
Prostate carcinoma - cystoprostatectomy - stage C - urinary diversion
References
1
Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Pontes J E.
Salvage radical prostatectomy.
Urol Clin North Am.
2001;
28
545-553
2
Aaronson N K, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N J, Filiberti A, Flechtner H,
Fleishman S B, de Haes J C. et al .
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life
instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1993;
385
365-376
3
Schroeder F R, Ouden D van den.
Management of locally advanced prostate cancer. 2. Radiotherapy, neoadjuvant endocrine
treatment, update 1997 - 1999.
World J Urol.
2000;
18
204-215
4
Lerner S E, Blute M L, Zincke H.
Critical evaluation of salvage surgery for radiorecurrent/resistant prostate cancer.
J Urol.
1995;
154
1103-1109
5
Green N, Treible D, Wallack H.
Prostate cancer: post-irradiation incontinence.
J Urol.
1990;
144 (2 Pt 1)
307-309
Tetsuro Kato
Department of Urology · Akita University School of Medicine
1-1-1 Hondo
Akita 010-8543
Japan