Download PDF
Horm Metab Res 2003; 35(5): 313-318
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41308
Original Clinical
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Pregnancy-associated Changes in Bone Density and Bone Turnover in the Physiological State: Prospective Data on Sixteen Women

C.  E.  Fiore1 , P.  Pennisi1 , A.  DiStefano2 , S.  Riccobene1 , S.  Caschetto2
  • 1Division of Internal Medicine and Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Catania, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Received 27 May 2002

Accepted after Revision 28 November 2002

Publication Date:
13 August 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Areal bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) was measured for the total body, lumbar spine and hip with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) before pregnancy and after delivery in sixteen women aged 21 - 35 years. Additional measurements included quantitative ultrasound indices (broadband ultrasound attenuation, BUA, at the calcaneus at baseline and at 16, 26, and 36 weeks of pregnancy, and postpartum) as well as biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption (measured before pregnancy and during pregnancy at 16, 22, 26, 30, 34, and 36 weeks of pregnancy and postpartum). The results of measurements were as follows: 1. Postpartum BMD showed a significant reduction in the total body (- 13.4 %), in the spine (- 9.2 %) and in the hip (-7.8 % at the femoral neck and - 9.2 % at the Ward's triangle) compared to pre-pregnancy values. 2. Biochemical markers of bone resorption increased by 26 weeks. 3. Bone ultrasound measurements that provide information on bone density before delivery did not change throughout pregnancy. A significant reduction of BUA (- 14.5 % compared to baseline) was observed postpartum only. These data would suggest that pregnancy-induced bone loss develops rapidly after the 36 week of pregnancy, possibly via enhanced bone resorption.

Key Words:

Pregnancy - Bone Ultrasonometry - Bone Mineral Density - Bone Resorption

References

  • 1 Heaney R P, Skillman T G. Calcium metabolism in normal human pregnancy.  J Clin Endocrinol. 1971;  33 661-670
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pitkin R M. Calcium metabolism in pregnancy and the perinatal period: a review. Am J Obstet.  Gynecol. 1985;  151 99-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kent G N, Price R I, Gutteridge D H. The efficiency of intestinal calcium absorption is increased in late pregnancy but not in established lactation.  Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;  48 293-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cundy T, Kanis J A. Calcium homeostasis during pregnancy.  Br Med J. 1981;  283 562-563
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cross N A, Hillman L S, Allen S H, Krause G F, Vieira N E. Calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism during pregnancy, lactation and postweaning: A longitudinal study.  Am J Clin Nutr.. 1995;  61 514-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gallacher S J, Fraser W D, Owens O J, Dryburgh F J, Logne F C, Jenkins A, Kennedy J, Boyle I T. Changes in calciotropic hormones and biochemical markers of bone turnover in normal human pregnancy.  Eur J Endocrinol. 1994;  131 369-374
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Black A J, Topping J, Durham B, Farquharson R G, Fraser W D. A detailed assessment of alterations in bone turnover, calcium homeostasis, and bone density in normal pregnancy.  J Bone Miner Res. 2000;  15 557-563
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Holmberg-Marttila D, Sievanen H, Tuimala R. Changes in bone mineral density during pregnancy and postpartum: prospective data on five women.  Osteoporosis Int. 1999;  10 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sowers M, Crutchfield M, Jannausch M, Updike S, Corton G. A prospective evaluation of bone mineral change in pregnancy.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  77 841-845
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Drinkwater B L, Chesnut C H. Bone density changes during pregnancy and lactation in active women: a longitudinal study.  Bone Min. 1991;  14 153-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Karlsson C, Obrant K J, Karlsson M. Pregnancy and lactation confer reversible bone loss in humans.  Osteoporosis Int. 2001;  12 828-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sowers M F, Scholl T, Harris L, Jannausch M. Bone loss in adolescent and adult pregnant women.  Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  96 189-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Naylor K E, Iqbel P, Fledelius C, Fraser R B, Eastell R. The effect of pregnancy on bone density and bone turnover.  J Bone Miner Res. 2000;  15 129-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Glüer C C. Quantitative ultrasound techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. The international quantitative ultrasound consensus group.  J Bone Miner Res. 1997;  12 1280-1288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kang C, Speller R. Comparison of ultrasound and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements in the calcaneus.  Br J Radiol. 1998;  71 861-867
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Greenspan S L, Cheng S, Miller P D, Orwoll E S. Clinical performance of a highly portable, scanning calcaneal ultrasonometer.  Osteoporosis Int. 2001;  12 391-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Graafmans W C, van Lingen A, Ooms M E, Bezemer P D, Lips P. Ultrasound measurememnts in the calcaneus. Precision and its relation with bone mineral density of the heel, hip and lumbar spine.  Bone. 1996;  19 97-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stewart A, Torgerson D J, Reid D M. Prediction of fractures in perimenopausal women: a comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;  55 140-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Young H, Howey S, Purdie D W. Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density.  Osteoporosis Int. 1993;  3 160-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Montagnani A, Martini S, Gennari L, Mangeri M, Gennari C. Heel ultrasonography in monitorino Alendronate therapy: a four-year longitudinal study.  Osteoporosis Int. 2002;  13 415-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kotzki P O, Buyck D, Hans D, Thomas E, Bonnel F, Favier F, Meunier P J, Rossi M. Influence of fat on ultrasound measurements of the os calcis.  Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;  54 91-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Phillips A J, Ostlere S J, Smith R. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: does the skeleton recover?.  Osteoporosis Int. 2000;  11 449-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Paparella P, Giorgino R, Maglione A, Lorusso D, Scirpa P, Del B osco, Mancuso S. Maternal ultrasound bone density in normal pregnancy.  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  22 268-278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Purdie D W, Aaron J E, Selby P L. Bone histology and mineral homeostasis in human pregnancy.  Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;  95 849-854
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shahtaheri S M, Aaron J E, Johnson D R, Purdie D W. Changes in trabecular bone architecture in women during pregnancy.  Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  106 432-438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Buster J E, Abraham G E. The application of steroid hormone radioimmunoassay to clinical obstetrics.  Obstet Gynecol. 1975;  46 489-499
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ogueh O, Khastgiv G, Abbas A, Jones J, Nicolaides K H, Studd J W. The feto-placental unit stimulates the pregnancy-associated increase in maternal bone metabolism.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 1834-1837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Laudat M H, Guilhaume B, Blot P, Fournier C, Giauque J B, Luton J P. The hormonal state of pregnancy: modification of cortisol and testosterone.  Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1987;  48 334-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Yano K, Shibata O, Mizuno A, Kobayashi F, Higashio K, Morinaga T, Tsuda E. Immunological study on circulating murine osteoprotegerin osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OPG/OCIF): possible role of OPG/OCIF in the prevention of osteoporosis in pregnancy.  Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;  288 217-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sasaki N, Kusano E, Ando Y, Yano K, Tsuda E, Asano Y. Glucorticoid decreases circulating osteoprotegerin (OPG): possible mechanism for glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis.  Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;  3 479-482
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bertelloni S, Baroncelli G I, Pelletti A, Battini R, Saggese G. Parathyroid hormone-related protein in healthy pregnant women.  Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;  54 195-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rodda C P, Kubota M, Heath J A, Ebeling P R, Moseley J M, Care A D, Caple I W, Martin T J. Evidence for a novel parathyroid hormone-related protein in fetal lamb parathyroid glands and sheep placenta: comparison with a similar protein implicated in humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy.  J Endocrinol. 1988;  117 261-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Care A D, Abbas S K, Barri M, Drinkhill M, Findlay J B, White I R, Caple I W. Stimulation of ovine placental transport of calcium and magnesium by mid-molecule fragments of human parathyroid hormone-related protein.  Exp Physiol. 1990;  75 605-608
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tojo Y, Kurabayashi T, Honda A, Yamamoto Y, Yahata T, Takakuwa K, Tanaka K. Bone structural and metabolic changes at the end of pregnancy and lactation in rats.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  178 180-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kalkwarf H J, Specker B L, Bianchi D, Ranz J, Ho M. The effect of calcium supplementation on bone density during lactation and after weaning.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  337 523-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Alderman B W, Weiss N S, Daling J R, Ure C L, Ballard J H. Reproductive history and postmenopausal risk of hip and forearm fracture.  Am J Epidemiol.. 1986;  124 262-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

C. E. Fiore

Division of Internal Medicine and Therapy · Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele

Via Plebiscito 628 · 95124 Catania · Italy

Phone: +39(95)316533

Fax: +39(95)316533

Email: carmelo.fiore@tin.it

      >