Download PDF
Endoscopy 2003; 35(1): 27-35
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-36410
State of the Art Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Colon Polyps and Cancer

J.  H.  Bond1
  • 1Gastroenterology Section, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 January 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

A large number of studies published last year in peer-reviewed medical journals help to better define the advantages and limitations of the different options for colorectal cancer screening. Direct colonoscopy screening appears to have the greatest potential to markedly reduce both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, but many obstacles limiting its widespread use in the general at-risk population still exist, and many questions remain incompletely answered. Recent studies stress the fact that finding and resecting advanced adenomatous polyps, and thereby preventing cancer, is becoming a primary objective of screening programs. Several papers also show the potential of emerging new methods of screening for specific markers in stool and for imaging the colon with computed-tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Other important publications highlighted in this review deal with the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, familial colorectal cancer, colorectal polyps and the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and new and novel methods of improving the efficiency and safety of colonoscopic polypectomy.

References

  • 1 Pigone M, Rich M, Teutsch S M. et al . Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.  Ann Intern Med. 2002;  137 132-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Winawer S J, Fletcher R, Rex D K. et al .Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rational - update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology Feb. 2003 [in press]
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dafnis G, Ekbom A, Pahlman L, Blomqvist P. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  54 302-309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lieberman D A, Weiss , DG , VA C ooperative. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult blood testing and examination of the distal colon.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 555-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hoffman P K. The anatomical distribution of colorectal polyps at colonoscopy.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;  33 222-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ikamoto M, Shiratori Y, Yamaji Y. et al . Relationship between age and site of colorectal cancer based on colonoscopic findings.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 548-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nusko G, Mansmann U, Wiest G. et al . Right-sided shift found in metachronous colorectal adenomas.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 574-579
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kim L S, Koch J, Yee J. et al . Comparison of patients’ experiences during imaging tests of the colon.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 67-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schoen R DE, Weissfeld J L, Trauth J M. et al . A population-based, community estimate of total colon examination: the impact on compliance with screening for colorectal cancer.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 446-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Imperiale T F, Wagner D R, Lin C Y. et al . Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 - 49 years of age.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 1781-1785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bond J H. Fecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;  12 11-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jorgensen O D, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds.  Gut. 2002;  50 29-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Scholefield J H, Moss S, Sufi F. et al . Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial.  Gut. 2002;  50 840-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators .Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 2002 359: 1291-1300
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J. et al . The effect of attending a flexible sigmoidoscopic screening program on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas at 13-year follow-up.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 1901-1907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yoshinaga M, Watabe R, Yanagisawa J. et al . The interval between flexible sigmoidoscopy screening examinations can be expanded beyond five years.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;  48 437-439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ringel Y, Dalton C B, Brandt L J. et al . Flexible sigmoidoscopy: the patient’s perception.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 315-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zack D L, DiBaise J K, Quigley E M, Roy H K. Colorectal cancer screening compliance by medicine residents: perceived and actual.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 3004-3008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ahlquist D A, Skoletsky J E, Boynton . et al . Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 1219-1227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dong S M, Traverso G, Johnson C. et al . Detecting colorectal cancer in stool with the use of multiple genetic targets.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;  93 858-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tibble J, Sigthorsson G, Foster R. et al . Faecal calprotectin and faecal occult blood tests in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and adenoma.  Gut. 2001;  49 402-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yee J, Akerkar G A, Hung R K. et al . Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.  Radiology. 2001;  219 685-692
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Xynopoulos D, Stasinopoulou M, Dimitroulopoulos D. et al . Colorectal polyp detection with virtual colonoscopy (computed tomographic colonography): the reliability of the method.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 124-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I. et al . Computed tomographic colonography virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 441-446
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gollub M J, Ginsberg M S, Cooper C, Thaler H T. Quality of virtual colonoscopy in patients who have undergone radiation therapy or surgery: how successful are we?.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  178 1109-1116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Akerkar G A, Yee J, Hung R, McQuaid K. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 310-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Svensson M H, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.  Radiology. 2002;  222 337-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Edwards J T, Wood C J, Mendelson R M, Forbes G M. Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 3009-3012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Winawer S J, Steward E T, Zauber A G. et al . A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1766-1777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rex D K, Rahmani E Y, Haseman J H. et al . Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 17-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Smith G A, O’Dwyer P J. Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 649-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ee H C, Semmens J B, Hoffman N E, Perth T eaching . Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 167-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 de Bosset V, Froelich F, Rey J P. et al . Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy?.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 360-368
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bond J H. Rectal bleeding: is it always an indication for colonoscopy?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 223-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Eckardt V F, Schmitt T, Kanzier G. et al . Does scant hematochezia necessitate the performance of total colonoscopy?.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 599-603
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lieberman D A, de Garmo P L, Fleischer D E. et al . Colonic neoplasia in patients with nonspecific GI symptoms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 647-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hassan M S, Meucci G, Toldi A. et al . Diagnostic yield of open access colonoscopy according to appropriateness.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 175-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gerson L B, Triadafilopoulos G. Is colorectal cancer screening necessary in the preoperative assessment of inguinal herniorrhaphy? A case-control study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 1914-1917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Schroy P C, Barrison A F, Ling B S. et al . Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1031-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Nakama H, Fukazawa K. Colorectal cancer risk in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyp.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 157-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Gerdes H. et al . Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 82-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rodriguez-Bigas M A, Boland C R, Hamilton S R. et al . A National Cancer Institute workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;  89 1758-1762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Katballe N, Christensen M, Wikman F P. et al . Frequency of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Danish colorectal cancer patients.  Gut. 2002;  50 43-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rijcken F E, Hollema H, Kleibeuker J H. Proximal adenomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer are prone to rapid malignant transformation.  Gut. 2002;  50 382-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Evans H S, Moller H, Robinson D. et al . The risk of subsequent primary cancers after colorectal cancer in southeast England.  Gut. 2002;  50 647-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bond J H. Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas.  Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2000;  11 176-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lieberman D A, Weiss D, Bond J H. et al . Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 162-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E. et al . High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  14 183-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Hao X P, Frayling I M, Sgouros J G. et al . The spectrum of p53 mutations in colorectal adenomas differs from that in colorectal cancers.  Gut. 2002;  50 834-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Kulling D, Christ A D, Karaaslan N. et al . Is histological investigation of polys always necessary?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 454-457
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Eisen G M, Kim C Y, Fleischer D E. et al . High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 687-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M. et al . Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1001-1006
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Tung S Y, Wu C S, Su M Y. Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2628-2632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shah S G. et al . Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrences after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 371-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Hsieh Y H, Lin H J, Tseng G Y. et al . Is submucosal epinephrine injection necessary before polypectomy? A prospective, comparative study.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;  48 1379-1382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

J. H. Bond, M.D.

University of Minnesota · Chief, Gastroenterology Section (111D) · VA Medical Center ·

One Veterans Drive · Minneapolis, MN 55417 · USA

Fax: + 1-612-725-2248

Email: john.bond@med.va.gov

      >