PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2002; 23(4): 251-262
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35875
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Central Auditory System and Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Some Conceptual Issues

Dennis P. Phillips
  • Hearing Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. Dezember 2002 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

The central auditory system has both parallel and hierarchical afferent architectures. In the frequency domain, it is tonotopically constrained, and in the spatial domain, it is dominated by a representation of the contralateral acoustic hemifield. The functions supported by the afferent pathways can be somewhat overlapping, and the connectivity among the pathways is to some degree plastic. Partial deafferentation (in the form of high-frequency hearing loss) and behavioral experience are capable of causing alterations in tonotopic maps in the more rostral auditory system, even in adult animals. Central auditory processing is often frequency-specific. The temporal processes needed for normal auditory function are diverse, which is to be expected given the heterogeneous ways in which auditory events are disposed in time and encoded neurally. Central auditory pathologies need not respect structural or functional boundaries in the brain, and so should be expected to have idiosyncratic presentations. Management strategies based on auditory training may exploit basic neuroplasticity, but more evidence is needed to substantiate any hypothesis of their differential efficacy in remediation of central auditory processing disorders or language and reading problems.

KEYWORDS

Auditory neuroscience - neural representation - neural plasticity - temporal processing - perceptual architecture - auditory training

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ruggero M A. Physiology and coding of sound in the auditory nerve. In: Popper AN, Fay RR, eds. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology New York: Springer-Verlag 1992: 34-93
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Phillips D P. Introduction to the central auditory nervous system. In: Jahn AF, Santos-Sacchi JR, eds. Physiology of the Ear, 2nd ed San Diego, CA: Singular; 2001;0:613-638
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Semple M N, Aitkin L M. Physiology of pathway from dorsal cochlear nucleus to inferior colliculus revealed by electrical and auditory stimulation.  Exp Brain Res . 1980;  41 19-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Spangler K M, Warr W B. The descending auditory system. In: Altschuler RA, Bobbin RP, Clopton BM, Hoffman DW, eds. Neurobiology of Hearing: The Central Auditory System New York: Raven Press 1991: 27-46
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kitzes L M, Doherty D. Influence of callosal activity on units in the auditory cortex of ferret (Mustela putorius).  J Neurophysiol . 1994;  71 1740-1751
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sally S L, Kelly J B. Effects of superior olivary complex lesions on binaural responses in rat inferior colliculus.  Brain Res . 1992;  572 5-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kitzes L M, Kageyama G H, Semple M N, Kil J. Development of ectopic projections from the ventral cochlear nucleus to the superior olivary complex induced by neonatal ablation of the contralateral cochlea.  J Comp Neurol . 1995;  353 341-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rajan R, Irvine D RF, Wise L Z, Heil P. Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex.  J Comp Neurol . 1993;  338 17-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Recanzone G H, Schreiner C E, Merzenich M M. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys.  J Neurosci . 1993;  13 87-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Weinberger N M. Learning-induced receptive field plasticity in the primary auditory cortex.  Semin Neurosci . 1997;  9 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kilgard M P, Merzenich M M. Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity.  Science . 1998;  279 1714-1718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Suga N, Yan J, Zhang Y. Cortical maps for hearing and egocentric selection for self-organization.  Trends Cogn Sci . 1997;  1 13-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Irvine D RF, Rajan R, McDermott H J. Injury-induced reorganization in adult auditory cortex and its perceptual consequences.  Hearing Res . 2000;  147 188-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Galaburda A M, Sherman G F, Rosen G D, Arboitis F, Geschwind N. Developmental dyslexia: four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies.  Ann Neurol . 1985;  18 222-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jenkins W M, Merzenich M M. Role of cat primary auditory cortex for sound localization behavior.  J Neurophysiol . 1984;  52 819-847
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Phillips D P, Taylor T L, Hall S E, Carr M M, Mossop J E. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: Some properties of ``central'' auditory gap detection.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1997;  101 3694-3705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Viemeister N F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1979;  66 1364-1380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Viemeister N F. Auditory intensity discrimination at high frequencies in the presence of noise.  Science . 1983;  221 1206-1208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Scharf B, Quigley S, Aoki C, Peachey N, Reeves A. Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity.  Percept Psychophys . 1987;  42 215-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bregman A S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound.  Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Phillips D P, Brugge J F. Progress in neurophysiology of sound localization.  Ann Rev Psychol . 1985;  36 245-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jenkins W M, Masterton R B. Sound localization: effects of unilateral lesions in central auditory pathways.  J Neurophysiol . 1982;  47 987-1016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Boehnke S E, Phillips D P. Azimuthal tuning of human perceptual channels for sound location.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1999;  106 1948-1955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Johnson K O. Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision.  J Neurophysiol . 1980;  43 1793-1815
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Phillips D P, Hall S E. Response timing constraints on the cortical representation of sound time structure.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1990;  88 1403-1411
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Phillips D P, Hall S E. Spatial and temporal factors in auditory saltation.  J Acoust Soc Am . 2001;  110 1539-1547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Phillips D P, Hall S E, Boehnke S E, Rutherford L ED. Spatial stimulus cue information supplying auditory saltation.  Perception . 2002;  31 875-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Farmer M E, Klein R. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: a review.  Psych Bull Rev . 1995;  2 460-493
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sanchez-Longo L P, Forster F M. Clinical significance of impairment of sound localization.  Neurol . 1958;  8 119-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Griffiths T D, Rees A, Witton C. Evidence for a sound movement area in the human cerebral cortex.  Nature . 1996;  383 425-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tramo M J, Shah G D, Braida L D. Functional role of auditory cortex in frequency processing and pitch perception.  J Neurophysiol . 2002;  87 122-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Peretz I, Kolinsky R, Tramo M. Functional dissociations following bilateral lesions of auditory cortex.  Brain . 1994;  117 1283-1301
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Phillips D P. Central auditory processing: a view from auditory neuroscience.  Am J Otol . 1995;  16 338-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Merzenich M M, Knight P L, Roth G L. Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat.  J Neurophysiol . 1975;  38 231-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Musiek F E, Reeves A G. Asymmetries of the auditory areas of the cerebrum.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1990;  1 240-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Cacace A T, McFarland D J. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1998;  41 355-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tallal P, Miller S, Fitch R H. Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the preeminence of temporal processing.  Ann NY Acad Sci . 1993;  682 27-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Fitch R H, Read H L, Benasich A A. Neurophysiology of speech perception in normal and impaired systems. In: Jahn AF, Santos-Sacchi JR, eds. Physiology of the Ear, 2nd ed San Diego, CA: Singular 2001: 651-672
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Bishop D VM, Carlyon R P, Deeks J M, Bishop S J. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1999;  42 1295-1310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wright B A, Lombardino L J, King W M. Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children.  Nature . 1997;  387 176-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Helenius P, Uutela K, Hari R. Auditory stream segregation in dyslexic adults.  Brain . 1999;  122 907-913
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hari R, Kiesilä P. Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults.  Neurosci Lett . 1996;  205 138-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Merzenich M M, Jenkins W M, Johnston P. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training.  Science . 1996;  271 77-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Tallal P, Miller S L, Bedi G. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech.  Science . 1996;  271 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Scientific Learning Corporation. Fast ForWord™ [Computer Software].  Berkeley, CA: Author 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Gillam R B, Frome Loeb D, Friel-Patti S. Looking back: a summary of five exploratory studies of Fast ForWord.  Am J Speech-Lang Pathol . 2001;  10 269-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Chermak G D. Managing central auditory processing disorders. Metalinguistic and metacognitive approaches.  Semin Hear . 1998;  19 379-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sloan C. Management of auditory processing difficulties. A perspective from speech-language pathology.  Semin Hear . 1998;  19 367-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Musiek F E, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders. A case study.  Semin Hear . 1998;  19 357-366
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Louis M, Espesser R, Rey V. Intensive training of phonological skills in progressive aphasia: a model of brain plasticity in neurodegenerative disease.  Brain Cogn . 2001;  46 197-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Habib M, Espesser R, Rey V. Training dyslexics with acoustically modified speech: evidence of improved phonological performance.  Brain Cogn . 1999;  40 143-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hook P E, Macaruso P, Jones S. Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties-a longitudinal study.  Ann Dyslexia . 2001;  51 75-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Tallal P, Stark R E. Perceptual/motor profiles of reading impaired children with or without concomitant oral language deficits.  Ann Dyslexia . 1982;  32 163-176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Van der Lely K J H, Rosen S, McClelland A. Evidence for a grammar-specific deficit in children.  Curr Biol . 1998;  8 1253-1258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Friel-Patti S, DesBarres K, Thibodeau L. Case studies of children using Fast ForWord.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 2001;  10 203-215
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Gillam R B, Crofford J A, Gale M A, Hoffman L M. Language change following computer-assisted language instruction with Fast ForWord or Laureate Learning Systems software.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 2001;  10 231-247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Marler J A, Champlin C A, Gillam R B. Backward and simultaneous masking measured in children with language-learning impairments who received intervention with Fast ForWord or Laureate Learning Systems software.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 2001;  10 258-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Thibodeau L M, Friel-Patti S, Britt, L. Psychoacoustic performance in children completing Fast ForWord training.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 2001;  10 248-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
      >