Endoscopy 2002; 34(10): 814-818
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34273
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Use of a Disposable Sheath System for Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in Decentralized Colorectal Cancer Screening

M.  Bretthauer 1, 2 , G.  Hoff 1, 2 , E.  Thiis-Evensen 3 , T.  Grotmol 2 , I.  K.  Larsen 2 , Ø.  Kjellevold 4 , E.  Skovlund 5
  • 1Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP), Telemark Public Hospital, Skien, Norway
  • 2The Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Norwegian National Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 4Rjukan Hospital, Rjukan, Norway
  • 5Section of Medical Statistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted: 9 February 2002

Accepted after Revision: 21 May 2002

Publication Date:
23 September 2002 (online)

Background and Study Aims: To prevent transmission of infectious agents and to reduce instrument reprocessing time, the use of disposable sheath systems instead of conventionally reprocessed endoscopes has been promoted for flexible sigmoidoscopy. This trial primarily investigated the feasibility of a disposable sheath system for flexible sigmoidoscopy in decentralized colorectal cancer screening.
Patients and Methods: In an ongoing colorectal cancer screening trial, 226 consecutive participants were randomly allocated to have their flexible sigmoidoscopy performed with either a fiberoptic sigmoidoscope covered with a disposable sheath (“EndoSheath group”) or a conventional video colonoscope (“standard colonoscope group”). All examinations were performed at a temporary screening center. The patients' experience was documented using a questionnaire. The feasibility of running temporary screening units was evaluated.
Results: Examinations beyond the 60-cm level were excluded. Thus, 113 patients (examined with the disposable instrument) and 87 (standard instrument) were eligible for analysis. When the sheathed system was used, all the devices needed could be satisfactorily transported. A screening center could be set up within a few hours. No differences were observed in patient discomfort. Fewer patients with polyps were observed in the EndoSheath group (48 [42 %]), compared with 55 (63 %) in the standard colonoscope group; P = 0.005). No significant differences were observed for polyps larger than 5 mm (14 [12 %] in the EndoSheath group, 13 [15 %] in the standard colonoscope group; P = 0.6).
Conclusions: Using the disposable system, decentralized colorectal cancer screening was easily established. However, fewer polyps were found, possibly due to the fiberoptic nature of the instrument. Sheathed video instruments are desirable and may increase the diagnostic yield.

References

  • 1 Gorman C. Everything you need to know about colon cancer and how to prevent it.  Time Magazine.. March 2000;  20 40-46
  • 2 Rex D, Johnson D A, Lieberman D A. et al . Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 868-877
  • 3 Sardinha C T, Wexner S D, Gilliland J. et al . Efficiency and productivity of a sheathed fiberoptic sigmoidoscope compared with a conventional sigmoidoscope.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 1248-1253
  • 4 Rothstein R I, Littenberg B. Disposable, sheathed, flexible sigmoidoscopy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. The disposable endoscope study group.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 566-572
  • 5 Rex D, Atkin W, Hoff G. et al . The flexible sigmoidoscope. Report of the flexible sigmoidoscopy subcommittee of the OMED colorectal cancer screening committee.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 587-589
  • 6 Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen I K. et al . Design, organisation and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia. Attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention).  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 568-573
  • 7 Spach D H, Silverstein F E, Stamm W E. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.  Arch Intern Med. 1993;  118 117-128
  • 8 Schroy P C, Wilson S, Adhal N. Feasibility of high-volume screening sigmoidoscopy using a flexible fiberoptic endoscope and a disposable sheath system.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1331-1337
  • 9 Seidlitz H K, Classen M. Optical resolution and color performance of electronic endoscopes.  Endoscopy. 1992;  24 225-228
  • 10 Schapiro M, Auslander M O, Schapiro M B. The electronic video endoscope: clinical experience with 1200 diagnostic and therapeutic cases in the community hospital.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;  33 63-68
  • 11 Atkin W S. Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a mass screening tool.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;  10 219-223
  • 12 Mayinger B, Strenkert M, Hochberger J. et al . Disposable-sheath, flexible gastroscope system versus standard gastroscopes: a prospective, randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 461-467

M. Bretthauer, M.D.

Department of Medicine · Telemark Public Hospital

Ulefossveien · 3710 Skien · Norway

Fax: + 47-3500-4944

Email: michael.bretthauer@tss.telemax.no

    >