A Synthetic Route to Hexahydro[1,4]oxazino[2,3-h] and [3,2-j]β-Carboline Derivatives

Abstract

Convenient methods for the regioselective formylation of tetrahydro[1,4]oxazino[2,3-f] and [3,2-g]indole derivatives 3 and 4 are described. The obtained formyl derivatives 6 and 8 were further transformed in four steps into the unknown hexahydro[1,4]oxazino[2,3-h] 1 and [3,2-j]β-carbolines 2.

oxazinoindoles - regioselective formylation - Vilsmeier-Haack reaction - Rieche reaction

References

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-1">1</A> Mayer S. Joseph B. Guillaumet G. Mérour J.-Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  1646 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-2">2</A> Hulkenberg A, and Van Wijingaarden I. inventors; Eur. Patent,  357122.  ; Chem. Abstr. 1970, 113, 152386

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-3A">3a</A> Ennis MD. Baze ME. Smith MW. Lawson CF. McCall RB. Lahti RA. Piercey MF. J. Med. Chem.  1992,  35:  3058 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-3B">3b</A> Andrew M. Birch AM. Bradley PA. Synthesis  1999,  1181 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-4">4</A> Mewshaw RE. Marquis KL. Shi X. McGaughey G. Stack G. Webb MB. Abou Gharbia M. Wasik T. Scerni R. Spangler T. Brennan JA. Mazandarini HJ. Coupet J. Andree TH. Tetrahedron  1998,  54:  7081 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-5A">5a</A> Sundberg RJ. Indoles   Academic Press; London: 1996.  p.113-116  

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-5B">5b</A> Desarbre E. Bergman J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1998,  2009 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-5C">5c</A> Semmelhack MF. Tetrahedron Lett.  1993,  34:  1395 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-6">6</A> Cotterill AS. Moody CJ. Roffey JRA. Tetrahedron  1995,  51:  7223 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-7A">7a</A> Black DStC. Kumar N. Wong LCH. Synthesis  1986,  474 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-7B">7b</A> Black DStC. Keller P. Kumar N. Aust. J. Chem.  1993,  46:  843 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-7C">7c</A> Black DStC. Kumar N. Mitchell PSR. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  2464 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-8A">8a</A> Partsvaniya DA. Akhvlediani RN. Zhigachev VE. Gordeev EN. Kuleshova LN. Suvorov NN. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin.  1986,  22:  1624 ; Chem. Abstr. 1988, 108, 5930

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-8B">8b</A> Partsvaniya DA. Akhvlediani RN. Gordeev EN. Vigdorchik MM. Kuleshova NN. Trubitsyna TK. Mashkovski MD. Suvorov NN. Khim. Farm. Zh.  1986,  20:  1454 ; Chem. Abstr. 1987, 106, 196345

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-9">9</A> Fujisawa T. Sato T. Org. Synth.  1987,  66:  121 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-10">10</A> Tani M. Aoki T. Ito S. Matsumoto S. Hideshima M. Fukushima K. Nozawa R. Maede T. Tashiro M. Chem. Pharm. Bull.  1990,  38:  3261 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-11">11</A> 1-Dimethylamino-2-nitroethene failed to react with 3 or 4 to give 9 or 12 according to Severin’s method: Severin T. Brück B. Chem. Ber.  1965,  98:  3847 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-12">12</A> Sinhababu AK. Borchardt RT. Tetrahedron Lett.  1983,  24:  227 

<A NAME="RZ07502SS-13">13</A>

Compound 6a (n = 1, R = H) could be also transformed into the corresponding nitroethyl derivative of type 10 in a total yield of 69%. Hydrogenation over Raney nickel afforded the ethylamine derivative as a relatively stable solid (mp 103-105 °C; 84% yield), which upon heating in toluene afforded the corresponding lactam of the type 11 in only 34% yield. (DBU gave only degradation products).