Growth Status and Estimated Growth Rate of Young Distance Runners

Abstract

A mixed-longitudinal design was used to evaluate the growth status (size attained) and estimated growth rate of competitive young distance runners. Twenty-seven male and 27 female distance runners were enrolled in the study based on race performance times. Ages ranged from 8.0 to 15.1 years at initial visit. Twenty males and 16 females were followed at approximate annual intervals for 4 or 5 years. Stature (cm) and body mass (kg) were measured on each occasion and annual growth velocities were estimated. Stature and body mass were plotted relative to age- and sex-specific U.S. reference data, while estimated velocities of stature (cm/yr) and body mass (kg/yr) were plotted relative to age- and sex-specific percentiles from the Zurich Longitudinal Study. Differences in growth pattern between the runners and the reference values were compared statistically with a growth curve estimation regression model. Mean statures of male and female distance runners approximate the reference medians, while mean body masses are slightly below reference medians. Mean stature and body mass also maintain a constant position relative to the reference values in both sexes over time. Estimated velocities for stature and body mass are, on average, similar to age- and sex-specific medians for Swiss youth. Slope values indicate no significant difference in growth patterns between young distance runners and reference values. The findings are consistent with other data indicating that intensive endurance training during childhood and adolescence does not influence size attained and rate of growth in stature and body mass.

Intensive training - running - youth - youth sports - adolescence - growth spurt

References

• 1 American Academy of Pediatrics . Risks in distance running for children.  Pediatr. 1990;  86 799-800
• 2 Berkey C S, Dockery D W, Wang X, Wypij D, Ferris B. Longitudinal height velocity standards for U.S. adolescents.  Stat Med. 1993;  12 403-414
• 3 Daniels J, Oldridge N, Nagle F, White B. Differences and changes in VO₂ among young runners 10 to 18 years of age.  Med Sci Sports. 1978;  10 200-203
• 4 Fogelholm M, Rankinen T, Isokaanta M, Kujala U, Uusitupa M. Growth, dietary intake, and trace element status of pubescent athletes and schoolchildren.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 738-746
• 5 Hamill P VV, Drizd T A, Johnson C L, Reed R D, Roche A F. NCHS growth curves for children, birth - 18 years. United States. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 11, No 165, DHEW Publication No. (PHS) 78 - 1650. Washington, DC; US Government Printing Office 1977
• 6 Kobayashi K, Kitamura K, Miura M, Sodeyama S, Murase Y, Miyashita M, Masui H. Aerobic power as related to body growth and training in Japanese boys: a longitudinal study.  J Appl Physiol. 1978;  44 666-672
• 7 Kuczmarski R J, Ogden C L, Grummer-Strawn L M, Flegal K M, Guo S S, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin L R, Roche A F, Johnson C L. CDC growth charts: United States. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, no 314. Hyattsville, MD; National Center for Health Statistics 2000
• 8 Malina R M. Physical growth and biological maturation of young athletes.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1994;  22 339-443
• 9 Malina R M. Growth and maturation of young athletes - Is training for sport a factor?. In: Chan KM, Micheli L (eds) Sports and Children. Hong Kong; Williams & Wilkins 1998: 133-161
• 10 Malina R M. Growth and maturation of elite female gymnasts: Is training a factor?. In: Johnston F, Zemel B, Eveleth P (eds) Human Growth in Context. London; Smith-Gordon 1999: 291-301
• 11 Malina R M, Beunen G, Wellens R, Claessens A. Skeletal maturity and body size of teenage Belgian track and field athletes.  Ann Hum Biol. 1986;  13 331-339
• 12 Malina R M, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics in press
• 13 Prader A, Largo R H, Molinari L, Issler C. Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age.  Helv Paediat Acta. 1989;  52 1-125
• 14 Preece M A, Baines M J. A new family of mathematical models describing the human growth curve.  Ann Hum Biol. 1978;  5 1-24
• 15 Roche A, Chumlea W, Thissen D. Assessing the Skeletal Maturity of the Hand-Wrist: Fels Method. Springfield, IL; Charles C Thomas 1988
• 16 Ross Laboratories .Calculation of incremental growth. Columbus, OH; Ross Laboratories 1990
• 17 Seefeldt V D. Elite young runners: an interdisciplinary perspective. In: Weiss M, Gould D (eds) Sport for Children and Youths. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1986: 213-284
• 18 Sundaresan S M, Roemmich J N, Rogol A D. Exercise and the developing child: Endocrine considerations. In: Warren MP, Constantini N (eds) Contemporary Endocrinology Series. Totowa, NJ; Humana Press 2000: 303-320
• 19 Susser M. What is cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology.  Am J Epidemiol . 1991;  133 635-648
• 20 Tanner J M, Davies P SW. Clinical longitudinal standards for height and height velocity for North American children.  J Pediatr. 1985;  107 317-329
• 21 Tanner J M, Hayashi T, Preece M A, Cameron N. Increase in length of leg relative to trunk in Japanese children and adults from 1957 to 1977: comparison with British and Japanese Americans.  Ann Hum Biol. 1982;  9 411-423
• 22 Tanner J M, Whitehouse R H, Cameron N, Marshall W A, Healy M JR, Goldstein H. Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Prediction of Adult Height. New York; Academic Press 1983
• 23 Weiner J S, Lourie J A. Human Biology: A Guide to Field Methods. Oxford; Blackwell Science 1969
• 24 Zemel B S, Johnson F E. Application of the Preece-Baines growth model to cross-sectional data: problems of validity and interpretation.  Am J Hum Biol. 1994;  6 563-570