Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate a simplified minimal model protocol for measuring insulin
sensitivity in mild and severe type 2 diabetes, considering that changes in serum
insulin during an insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test almost only
reflect the insulin injection. Two groups of diabetics treated with high doses of
antidiabetic agents were recruited. Mean insulin responses were calculated in group
1 (n = 30). In group 2 (n = 38), we compared insulin sensitivity (SI) obtained with
reference protocol with SI calculated by a minimal model procedure including the theoretical
average insulin profile determined in group 1, and with Homeostasis Model Assessment
(HOMA-R). Additionally, the cost of each procedure was calculated. SI measured by
the reference method strongly correlated with SI determined by the simplified protocol
(r = 0.966, p < 0.0001), while no correlation was found with HOMA-R (r = - 0.349,
NS). Reduction of cost for HOMA-R and simplified minimal model procedure were - 92
and - 81 %, respectively. This simplified and relative inexpensive protocol, using
minimal model procedure without insulin measurement, accurately measures SI regardless
of β-cell defect degree. This approach could be of interest when limits of validity
of simple indexes are reached.
Key words
Insulin Resistance - Type 2 Diabetes - Minimal Model - Basal Indexes - HOMA
1
Reaven G M.
Role of insulin resistance in human disease.
Diabetes.
1988;
37
1595-1607
2
Fujimoto W Y.
The importance of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Am J Med.
2000;
108 (Suppl 6a)
9S-14S
3
Kahn S E.
The importance of the beta-cell in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Am J Med.
2000;
108 (Suppl 6a)
2S-8S
4
Cavaghan M K, Ehrmann D A, Polonsky K S.
Interactions between insulin resistance and insulin secretion in the development of
glucose intolerance.
J Clin Invest Aug.
2000;
106 (3)
329-333
5
Haffner S M, Howard G, Mayer E, Bergman R N, Savage P J, Rewers M, Mykkänen L, Karter J,
Hamman R, Saad M F.
Insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in African American, non Hispanic white,
and Hispanics with NIDDM. The insulin resistance atherosclerosis study.
Diabetes.
1997;
46
63-69
6
Gerich J E.
Insulin resistance is not necessarily an essential component of type 2 diabetes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2000;
85 (6)
2113-2115
7
Saad M F, Anderson R L, Watanabe R M, Kades W W, Chen Y DI, Sands R E, Pei D, Savage P J,
Bergman R N.
A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of
insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance.
Diabetes.
1994;
43
1114-1121
8
Katsuki A, Sumida Y, Gabazza E C, Murashima S, Furuta M, Araki-Sasaki R, Hori Y, Yano Y,
Adachi Y.
Homeostasis model assessment is a reliable indicator of insulin resistance during
follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2001;
24
362-365
9
Brun J F, Raynaud E, Mercier J.
Homeostasis model assessment and related simplified evaluations of insulin sensitivity
from fasting insulin and glucose: no need for log transformation but beware of the
limits of validity.
Diabetes Care.
2000;
23
1037-1038
10
Welch S, Gebhart S SP, Bergman R N, Phillips L S.
Minimal model analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity
in diabetic subjects.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
1990;
71
1508-1518
11
Yang Y J, Youn J A, Bergman R N.
Modified protocols to improve insulin sensitivity estimation using the minimal model.
Am J Physiol.
1987;
253
595-602
12
The expert Committee on the Diagnosis and classification of Diabetes mellitus .
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Care.
1997;
10
1183-1197
13
Brun J F, Guintrand-Hugret R, Boegner C, Bouix 0, Orsetti A.
Influence of short submaximal exercise on parameters of glucose assimilation analyzed
with the minimal model.
Metabolism.
1995;
44
833-840
14
Brun J F, Fédou C, Monnier J F, Jourdan N I, Orsetti A.
Relationships between insulin resistance measured with the minimal model and microalbuminuria
in type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetics.
Endocrinology and Metabolism.
1995;
2
203-213
15
Raynaud E, Pérez-Martin A, Brun J F, Fédou C, Mercier J.
Insulin sensitivity measured with the minimal model is higher in moderately overweight
women with predominantly lower body fat.
Horm Metab Res.
1999;
31
415-417
16
Matthews D R, Hosker J P, Rudenski A S, Naylor B A, Treacher D F, Turner R C.
Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting
plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.
Diabetologia.
1985;
28
412-419
17
Marquis P.
Comparaisons de méthodes analytiques.
Ann Biol Clin.
1999;
57
737-738 (http://perso.easynet.fr/-philimar)
18
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
i
307-310
19
Foley J E, Chen Y D, Lardinois C K, Hollenbeck C B, Liu G C, Reaven G.
Estimates of in vivo insulin action in humans: comparison of the insulin clamp and the minimal model techniques.
Horm Metab Res.
1985;
17
406-409
20
Persson B, Edwall L, Hanson U, Nord E, Westgren M.
Insulin sensitivity and insulin response in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Horm Metab Res.
1997;
29
393-397
21
Bergman R N, Prager R, Volund A, Olefsky J M.
Equivalence of the insulin sensitivity index in man derived by the minimal model method
and the euglycemic glucose clamp.
J Clin Invest.
1987;
79
790-800
22
Emoto M, Nishizawa Y, Maekawa K, Hiura Y, Kanda H, Kawagishi Shoji T, Okuno Y, Morii H.
Homeostasis model assessment as a clinical index of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic
patients treated with sulfonylureas.
Diabetes Care.
1999;
22
818-822
23
Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, Bonadonna R C, Saggiani F, Zen M B, Monauni T, Muggeo M.
Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment
of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance
and insulin sensitivity.
Diabetes Care.
2000;
23
57-63
24
Kahn S E, Prigeon R L, McCulloch D K, Boyko E J, Bergman R N, Schwartz M W, Neifing J L,
Ward W K, Beard J C, Palmer J P, Porte D R.
Quantification of the relationship between insulin sensitivity and b-cell function
in human subjects: evidence for a hyperbolic function.
Diabetes.
1993;
42
1663-1672
25
Mari A, Pacini G, Murphy E, Ludvik B, Nolan J J.
A model-based method for assessing insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose tolerance
test.
Diabetes Care.
2001;
24
539-548
Antonia Pérez-Martin, M.D.
CERAMM-CHU Lapeyronie
34 295 Montpellier Cedex 5 · France
Phone: + 33 (0) 4 67 33 82 84
Fax: + 33 (0) 4 67 33 89 86
Email: a-perez_martin@chu-montpellier.fr