Endoscopy 2002; 34(3): 203-207
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20292
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Pseudocyst: A Long-Term Follow-Up

S.  S.  Sharma 1 , N.  Bhargawa 2 , A.  Govil 3
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India
  • 2SN Medical College, Jodhpur, India
  • 3SDM Hospital, Jaipur, India
Further Information

Publication History

1 February 2001

29 August 2001

Publication Date:
22 February 2002 (online)

Background and Study Aims: No studies with real long-term follow-up after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts are available. The present study was undertaken to investigate the long-term outcome of endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Patients and Methods: A total of 38 consecutive patients with pancreatic pseudocyst underwent endoscopic cystogastrostomy (n = 27), endoscopic cystoduodenostomy (n = 6) and transpapillary drainage (n = 5). Patients were monitored at 1 and 3 months after drainage, and finally between 24 and 80 months. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done at 1 and 3 months after drainage while ultrasound was done at 3 months and at the end of follow-up. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was only done before cyst drainage if no cyst bulge was visible in the stomach or duodenum or if obstructive jaundice was present.
Results: Biliary pancreatitis was responsible for the pseudocyst in 19 cases while the remaining occurrences were caused by alcohol (n = 12) and trauma (n = 7). All forms of endoscopic drainage were effective in treating pancreatic pseudocyst and there was complete disappearance of the cyst within 3 months of drainage, irrespective of cause. Over a mean follow-up of 44.23 months (24 - 80 months). Three patients had symptomatic recurrences while three had asymptomatic recurrences; all had alcohol-induced pancreatitis. No recurrences were seen in the biliary pancreatitis and trauma group. All symptomatic recurrences were successfully managed with endoscopic cystogastrostomy and stenting. A massive bleed in one patient required surgery while stent block and cyst infection in three patients and perforation in one patient were managed conservatively. ERCP was done before cyst drainage in eight patients because there was no visible bulge into the stomach or duodenum (n = 5), or because obstructive jaundice was present (n = 3). In five patients ERCP revealed cyst duct communication. All these patients were managed by transpapillary drainage and there was only one asymptomatic recurrence in this group.
Conclusion: Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst is quite an effective and safe mode of treatment in experienced hands. ERCP before the procedure is only required when the cyst does not bulge into gut lumen, for a decision about the feasibility of transpancreatic drainage. On long-term follow-up, recurrences were seen only in the alcoholic pancreatitis group. In the biliary pancreatitis group, no recurrences were seen after cholecystectomy and removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones if present. No recurrences were seen in the trauma group.

References

  • 1 Rodgers B HG, Giarel N J, Seed R W. Transgastric needle aspiration of pancreatic pseudocyst through an endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;  21 133
  • 2 Kozarek R A, Brayko C M, Harlan J. et al . Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1985;  31 322-327
  • 3 Binmoeller K F, Seifert H, Walter A, Soehendra N. Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  43 219-224
  • 4 Barthet M, Sahel J, Bertei C B, Bernard J P. Endoscopic transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 208-213
  • 5 Catalano M F, Geenen J E, Schmalz M J. et al . Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct endoprosthesis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 214-218
  • 6 Cremer M, Deviere J, Engelholm L. Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts of chronic pancreatitis. Long-term follow-up after 7 years of experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 1-9
  • 7 Bejanin H, Liguory C, Ink O. et al . Endoscopic drainage of pseudocyst of pancreas, study of 26 cases.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1993;  17 804-810
  • 8 Barthet M, Bugallo M, Moreira L S. et al . Management of cysts and pseudocysts complicating chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective study of 143 patients.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1993;  17 270-276
  • 9 Smits M E, Rauws E A, Tytgat G N, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 202-207
  • 10 Axon A TR, Classen M, Cotton P B. et al . Pancreatography on chronic pancreatitis. International definition.  Gut. 1984;  25 1107-1112
  • 11 Howell D A, Holbrook R F, Bosco J J. et al . Endoscopic needle localization of pancreatic pseudocysts before transmural drainage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 693-698
  • 12 Howell D A, Lehman G A, Baron T H. et al . Pancreatic ductal anatomy in patients undergoing endoscopic pseudocyst drainage. Implication of follow-up data.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 467A
  • 13 Deviere J, Bueso H, Baize M. et al . Complete disruption of main pancreatic duct: endoscopic management.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 445-451
  • 14 Kozarek R A, Ball T J, Patterson D J. et al . Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  100 1362-1370
  • 15 Howell D A, Lehman G A, Baron T H. et al . Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts: a retrospective multicentre analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 513A
  • 16 Funnell I C, Bornman P C, Krige J E. et al . Endoscopic drainage of traumatic pancreatic pseudocyst.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 879-881
  • 17 Fockens P, Johnson T G, van Dullemen H M. et al . Endosonography is a prerequisite before endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 516A
  • 18 Vallera R, Dalton C, Branch M. et al . Endoscopic transductal drainage for pancreatic ductal disruptions and communicating pseudocysts.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 1616A
  • 19 Bohnacker S, Binmoeller K F, Seifert H. et al . EUS guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in 27 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 416A
  • 20 Fockens P, Johnson T G, van Dulleman H M. et al . Endosonography is a prerequisite before endoscopic drainage of pancreatitis pseudocysts.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 516A
  • 21 Grimm H, Binmoeller K E, Soehendra N. Endosonography guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 693-698
  • 22 Vitas G J, Sarr M G. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management.  Surgery. 1992;  111 123-130
  • 23 Yeo C J, Bastidas J A, Lynch-Nyhan A. et al . The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts demonstrated by computed tomography.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;  170 411-417
  • 24 Kozarek R A, Ball T J, Patterson D J, Freeny P C. Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  100 1362-1370
  • 25 Rescorla F J, Plumley D A, Sherman S. et al . Efficacy of early ERCP in pediatric pancreatic trauma.  J Pediatr Surg. 1995;  30 336-340

S. S. Sharma, M.D.

D-163

Savitri Path · Bapu Nagar · Jaipur 302015 · India

Fax: + 91-141-381730

Email: DRSSS@datainfosys.net

    >