Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2002; 23(2): 130-135
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20133
Training and Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

A Comparison of the Lactate Pro, Accusport, Analox GM7 and Kodak Ektachem Lactate Analysers in Normal, Hot and Humid Conditions

L.  R.  Mc Naughton1 , D.  Thompson1 , G.  Philips2 , K.  Backx3 , L.  Crickmore3
  • 1 University of Bath, Great Britain
  • 2 Amateur Swimming Association of Great Britain
  • 3 Kingston University, Great Britain
Further Information

Publication History

May 31, 2001

Publication Date:
13 February 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the performance of a new portable lactate analyser against other standard laboratory methods in three conditions, normal (20 ± 1.3 °C; 40 ± 5 % RH), hot (40 ± 2.5 °C; 40 ± 5 % RH), and humid (20 ± 1.1 °C; 82 ± 6 % RH) conditions. Seven healthy males, ([Mean ± SE]: age, 26.3 ± 1.3 yr; height, 177.7 ± 1.6 cm; weight, 77.4 ± 0.9 kg, V˙O2max, 56.1 ± 1.9 ml × kg × min-1) undertook a maximal cycle ergometry test to exhaustion in the three conditions. Blood was taken every 3 min at the end of each stage and was analysed using the Lactate Pro LT-1710®, the Accusport®, the Analox© GM7 and the Kodak© Ektachem™ systems. The MANOVA (Analyser Type × Condition × Workload) indicated no interaction effect (F(42, 660), = 0.45, p > 0.99, Power = 0.53). The data across all workloads indicated that the machines measured significantly differently to each other (F(4,743) = 14.652, p < 0.0001, Power = 1.00). The data were moderately to highly correlated. We conclude that the Lactate Pro is a simple and effective measurement device for taking blood lactate in a field or laboratory setting. However, we would caution against using this machine to compare data from other machines.

Key words

Lactate pro · lactate · enzymatic · testing · environmental · hot · humid

References

  • 1 Altman D, Bland J M. Measurement in medicine: the analysis method comparison studies.  Statistician. 1983;  32 307-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 American Diabetes Association . Consensus statement on self monitoring of blood glucose.  Diabetes Care. 1995;  18 46-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  307-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bonifazi M, Martelli G, Marugo L, Sardella F, Carli G. Blood lactate accumulation in top level swimmers following competition.  J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1993;  33 13-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Coyle E F. Integration of the physiological factors determining endurance performance ability. In: Holloszy JO, (ed) Exercise and Sports Science Reviews. Baltimore; Williams and Wilkins 1995: 25-63
    Google Scholar
  • 7 di Prampero P E. Energetics of muscular exercise.  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharm. 1981;  89 144-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fell J W, Rayfield J M, Gulbin J P, Gaffney P T. Evaluation of the Accusport® Lactate Analyser.  Int J Sports Med. 1998;  19 199-204
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Green S, Dawson B. Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans. Definitions, limitations and unsolved problems.  Sports Med. 1993;  15 312-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hopkins W G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and sports science.  Sports Med. 2000;  30 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Makita S, Satomi J. Reliability of simplified blood lactate test meter (Lactate Pro).  J Clin Sports Med. 1997;  14 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Medbo J I, Mohn A C, Tabata I, Bahr R, Vaage O, Sejersted O M. Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O2 deficit.  J Appl Physiol. 1988;  64 50-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nevill A, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science.  Br J Sports Med. 1997;  31 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pyne D B, Boston T, Martin T, Logan A. Evaluation of the lactate pro blood lactate analyser.  Eur J Appl Phys. 2000;  82 112-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pfitzinger P, Freedson P S. The reliability of lactate measurements during exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1998;  19 349-357
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sjodin B, Jacobs I. Onset of blood lactate accumulation and marathon running performance.  Int J Sports Med. 1981;  2 23-26
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Telford R. Lactic acid measurements - are they useful.  Sports Sci Med Q. 1984;  1 2-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Terashimi K, Katsuhiko T, Wakayoshi K. Development of a small and simple lactate test meter with minimum sample volume of 5 l. Kyoto, Japan; ArkrayKDK Corporation 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Yoshida T, Chida M, Ichioka M, Suda Y. Blood lactate parameters related to aerobic capacity and endurance performance.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987;  56 7-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Welsman J. Methodological problems of lactate testing.  Coaching Focus. 1992;  21 14-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. L.  Mc Naughton

University of Bath

Claverton Down · Bath BA2 7AY · England ·

Phone: +44 (1225) 323545

Fax: +44 (1225) 826696

Email: l.mcnaughton@bath.ac.uk

      >