Semin Neurol 2001; 21(3): 337-342
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17950
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Ethical Issues Surrounding the Evaluation of Oxidative Phosphorylation Disorders in Children

Nicolas Krawiecki
  • Emory University School of Medicine, Scottish Rite Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
18. Oktober 2001 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Genetic testing is becoming increasingly frequent as a part of a pediatric evaluation. Oxidative phosphorylation disorders are likewise becoming part of the differential diagnosis for many children with undiagnosed neurologic problems. The complexity of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway and its dual genetic control by nuclear and mitochondrial DNA raise a number of ethical issues dealing mainly with the informed consent process, the respect for a patient's autonomy, the best interest of the patients and their families, as well as issues of genetic discrimination and genetic privacy laws. Open communication with families in pediatric medicine remains the cornerstone of good ethics, along with the skill needed to avoid having ethical issues arise.

REFERENCES

  • 1 King N MP. Transparency in neonatal intensive care.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1992;  22 18-25
  • 2 Shoffner J M, Wallace D C. Oxidative phosphorylation diseases. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease New York: McGraw-Hill 1995: 1535-1609
  • 3 Drummond C. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral functioning of children with disorders of oxidative phosphorylation. Thesis. Georgia State University, 1997
  • 4 Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics.  Informed consent, parental permission and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics . 1995;  95 314-317
  • 5 Ondrusek N, Abramovitch R, Pencharz P, Koren G. Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research.  J Med Ethics . 1998;  24 158-165
  • 6 Wertz D C, Fanos J H, Reilly P R. Genetic testing for children and adolescents: who decides?.  JAMA . 1994;  272 875-881
  • 7 Clayton E W. Genetic testing in children.  J Med Philos . 1997;  22 233-251
  • 8 Kurtz Z. Appropriate paternalism and the best interest of the child. In: Clarke A, ed. The Genetic Testing of Children Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers 1998: 237-243
  • 9 McLean S AM. The genetic testing of children: some legal and ethical concerns. In: Clarke A, ed. The Genetic Testing of Children Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers 1998: 17-26
  • 10 Hoedermaekeers R. Predictive genetic screening and the concept of risk. In: Clarke A, ed. The Genetic Testing of Children Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers 1998: 245-264
  • 11 Thiroux J P. Ethics: Theory and Practice.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1995: 374
  • 12 Brody H. Transparency: informed consent in primary care.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1989;  19 5-9
  • 13 Jaeger A S, Mulholland W F. Impact of genetic privacy legislation on insurer behavior.  Genet Test . 2000;  4 31-42
  • 14 Barash C. Genetic discrimination and screening for hemochromatosis: then and now.  Genet Test . 2000;  4 213-218
  • 15 Oakley E F. Federal regulation of use of genetic information by insurers: what constitutes unfair discrimination.  North American Actuarial Journal . 1999;  3 116-132