Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2001; 05(3): 241-250
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17542
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Research Tool for Biomechanical Studies of the Wrist

Peter J. Keir
  • School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, North York, Ontario
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 October 2001 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The field of biomechanics has welcomed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a research tool to provide quantified anatomy of various body parts in vivo. The ability to view, reconstruct, and analyze images of an intact system under varying conditions has improved our knowledge of functional anatomy. This article forms a review of MRI use in biomechanics research, with examples from several areas and an emphasis on the distal upper extremity. Biomechanical parameters such as muscle fascicle directions of pull, moment arms in three dimensions, muscle cross-sectional areas, and detailed muscle geometry data are prevalent because of advances in imaging technology. This has resulted in improved anatomic realism in biomechanical models. Wrist biomechanics research has benefited greatly using MRI. The unique anatomy of the carpal tunnel, and the concerns regarding carpal tunnel syndrome, have prompted numerous studies examining the contents of the carpal tunnel, its shape, and its volume. These studies are presented, as is an analysis of the finger flexor tendons as they pass through the carpal tunnel. These imaging-based studies all examine the aspects of the potential mechanisms for median nerve compression at the wrist. MRI is a tremendously valuable tool in biomechanics research, especially in the search for the mechanisms of carpal tunnel syndrome and wrist function, providing both visual representation and quantitative evaluation of anatomic phenomena.

KEYWORD

Biomechanics - magnetic resonance imaging - wrist - modeling - carpal tunnel syndrome

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gordon A M, Huxley A F, Julian F J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres.  J Physiol . 1966;  184 170-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rugg S G, Gregor R J, Mandelbaum B R, Chiu L. In vivo moment arm calculations at the ankle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).  J Biomech . 1990;  23 495-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Spoor C W, Van Leeuwen L J. Knee muscle moment arms from MRI and from tendon travel.  J Biomech . 1992;  25 201-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wretenberg P, Nemeth G, Lamontagne M, Lundin B. Passive knee muscle moment arms measured in vivo with MRI.  Clin Biomech . 1996;  11 439-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 McGill S M, Juker D, Axler C. Correcting trunk muscle geometry obtained from MRI and CT scans of supine postures for use in standing postures.  J Biomech . 1996;  29 643-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fowler N K, Nicol A C. Interphalangeal joint and tendon forces: normal model and biomechanical consequences of surgical reconstruction.  J Biomech . 2000;  33 1055-1062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hauger O, Chung C B, Lektrakul N. Pulley system in the fingers: normal anatomy and simulated lesions in cadavers at MR imaging, CT, and US with and without contrast material distention of the tendon sheath.  Radiology . 2000;  217 201-212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Arnold A S, Salinas S, Asakawa D J, Delp S L. Accuracy of muscle moment arms estimated from MRI-based musculoskeletal models of the lower extremity.  Comput Aided Surg . 2000;  5 108-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Narici M V, Roi G S, Landoni L. Force of knee extensor and flexor muscles and cross-sectional area determined by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.  Eur J Appl Physiol . 1988;  57 39-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Narici M V, Landoni L, Minetti A E. Assessment of human knee extensor muscles stress from in vivo physiological cross-sectional area and strength measurements.  Eur J Appl Physiol . 1992;  65 438-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Beneke R, Neuerburg J, Bohndorf K. Muscle cross-section measurement by magnetic resonance imaging.  Eur J Appl Physiol . 1991;  63 424-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fukunaga T, Roy R R, Shellock F G. Physiological cross-sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging.  J Orthop Res . 1992;  10 926-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Engstrom C M, Loeb G E, Reid J G, Forrest W J, Avruch L. Morphometry of the human thigh muscles: a comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images.  J Anat . 1991;  176 139-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Scott S H, Engstrom C M, Loeb G E. Morphometry of human thigh muscles: determination of fascicle architecture by magnetic resonance imaging.  J Anat . 1993;  182 249-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Marras W S, Jorgensen M J, Granata K P, Wiand B. Female and male trunk geometry: size and prediction of the spine loading trunk muscles derived from MRI.  Clin Biomech . 2001;  16 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 McGill S M. A revised anatomical model of the abdominal musculature for torso flexion efforts.  J Biomech . 1996;  29 973-977
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Parkkola R, Kujala U, Rytokoski U. Response of the trunk muscles to training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and muscle strength.  Eur J Appl Physiol . 1992;  65 383-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bull A M, McGregor A H. Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device.  Clin Biomech . 2000;  15 772-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Reich J, Daunicht W J. A rigid body model of the forearm.  J Biomech . 2000;  33 1159-1168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Yamazaki N. In vivo motion analysis of forearm rotation utilizing magnetic resonance imaging.  Clin Biomech . 1999;  14 315-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation.  J Hand Surg (Br) . 1999;  24 245-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Weinberg A M, Pietsch I T, Helm M B, Hesselbach J, Tscherne H. A new kinematic model of pro- and supination of the human forearm.  J Biomech . 2000;  33 487-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bonutti P M, Norfray J F, Friedman R J, Genez B M. Kinematic MRI of the shoulder.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1993;  17 666-669
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Graichen H, Stammberger T, Bonel H, Karl-Hans E, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Glenohumeral translation during active and passive elevation of the shoulder.  J Biomech . 2000;  33 609-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Koenig H, Lucas D, Meissner R. The wrist: a preliminary report on high-resolution MR imaging.  Radiology . 1986;  160 463-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Weiss K L, Beltran J, Shamam O M, Stilla R F, Levey M. High-field MR surface-coil imaging of the hand and wrist. Part I. Normal anatomy.  Radiology . 1986;  160 143-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Weiss K L, Beltran J, Lubbers L M. High-field MR surface-coil imaging of the hand and wrist. Part II. Pathologic correlations and clinical relevance.  Radiology . 1986;  160 147-152
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Middleton W D, Kneeland J B, Kellman G M. MR imaging of the carpal tunnel: normal anatomy and preliminary findings in the carpal tunnel syndrome.  AJR . 1987;  148 307-316
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Markison R E. Treatment of musical hands: redesign of the interface.  Hand Clinics . 1990;  6 225-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dekel S, Papaioannou T, Rushworth G, Coates R. Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome caused by carpal stenosis.  Br Med J . 1980;  280 1297-1299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Winn F J, Habes D J. Carpal tunnel area as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve . 1991;  13 254-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bleecker M L, Bohlman M, Moreland R, Tipton A. Carpal tunnel syndrome: role of carpal canal size.  Neurology . 1985;  35 1599-1604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Skie M, Zeiss J, Ebraheim N A, Jackson W T. Carpal tunnel changes and median nerve compression during wrist flexion and extension seen by magnetic resonance.  
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tanzer R C. The carpal-tunnel syndrome: a clinical and anatomical study.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1959;  41A 626-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Smith E M, Sonstegard D A, Anderson W H. Carpal tunnel syndrome: contribution of flexor tendons.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1977;  58 379-385
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Keir P J, Wells R P, Ranney D A, Lavery W. The effects of tendon load and posture on carpal tunnel pressure.  J Hand Surg . 1997;  22A 628-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Yoshioka S, Okuda Y, Tamai K, Hirasawa Y, Koda Y. Changes in carpal tunnel shape during wrist joint motion: MRI evaluation of normal volunteers.  J Hand Surg . 1993;  18B 620-623
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cobb T K, Dalley B K, Posteraro R H, Lewis R C. Establishment of carpal contents/canal ratio by means of magnetic resonance imaging.  J Hand Surg . 1992;  17A 843-849
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ham S J, Kolkman W FA, Heeres J, den Boer A J, Vierhout P AM. Changes in the carpal tunnel due to action of the flexor tendons: visualization with magnetic resonance imaging.  J Hand Surg . 1996;  21A 997-1003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Richman J A, Gelberman R H, Rydevik B L, Gylys-Morin V M, Hajek P C, Sartoris D J. Carpal tunnel volume determination by magnetic resonance imaging three-dimensional reconstruction.  J Hand Surg . 1987;  12A 712-717
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Keir P J, Wells R P. Changes in geometry of the finger flexor tendons in the carpal tunnel with wrist posture and tendon load: an MRI study on normal wrists.  Clin Biomech . 1999;  14 635-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lundborg G N, Gelberman R H, Minteer-Convery M, Lee Y F, Hargens A R. Median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel: functional response to experimentally induced controlled pressure.  J Hand Surg . 1982;  7 252-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 An K-N, Berglund L, Cooney W P, Chao E YS, Kovacevic N. Direct in vivo tendon force measurement system.  J Biomech . 1990;  23 1269-1271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rempel D. Musculoskeletal loading and carpal tunnel pressure. In: Gordon SL, Blair SJ, Fine LJ, eds. Repetitive Motion Disorders of the Upper Extremity Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995: 123-132
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Armstrong T J, Chaffin D B. Some biomechanical aspects of the carpal tunnel.  J Biomech . 1979;  12 567-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Schuind F, Ventura M, Pasteels J L. Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Histologic study of flexor tendon synovium.  J Hand Surg . 1990;  15A 497-503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Armstrong T J, Castelli W A, Evans F G, Diaz-Perez R. Some histological changes in the carpal tunnel contents and their biomechanical implications.  J Occup Med . 1984;  26 197-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kerr C D, Sybert D R, Albarracin N S. An analysis of the flexor synovium in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: report of 625 cases.  J Hand Surg . 1992;  17A 1028-1030
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Szabo R M, Bay B K, Sharkey N A, Gaut C. Median nerve displacement through the carpal canal.  J Hand Surg . 1994;  19A 901-906
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Keir P J, Bach J M. Flexor muscle incursion into the carpal tunnel: a mechanism for increased carpal tunnel pressure?.  Clin Biomech . 2000;  15 301-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Wells R, Keir P J. Work and activity-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. In: Kumar S, ed. Biomechanics in Ergonomics Taylor & Francis, 1999: 165-177
    Google Scholar
      >