Download PDF
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2000; 43(2): 87-90
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8325
ÜBERSICHT
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Ventriculostomy versus Shunt Operationin Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Diagnostics and Indication

U. Meier, F. S. Zeilinger, B. Schönherr
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

In contrast to the shunt operation the indication for an endoscopic ventriculostomy in patients diagnosed for normal pressure hydrocephalus is not scientifically established. Between September 1997 and December 1999 we operated on 48 patients diagnosed for normal pressure hydrocephalus. The diagnosis was established by means of the intrathecal lumbar or ventricular infusion test, the cerebrospinal fluid tap test and MRI-CSF flow studies pre- and postoperatively. In 37 patients (77 %) we have implanted a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt, and in 11 patients (23 %) we performed the endoscopic assisted third ventriculostomy. With our created NPH recovery rate and use of the clinical grading for normal pressure hydrocephalus created by Kiefer and Steudel we compared the operative results of both groups of patients. In patients with a pathologically increased resistance to CSF outflow in the lumbar infusion test a shunt implantation is indicated. Patients whose outflow resistance is increased in the ventricular infusion test but with a physiological lumbar infusion test are suspected for a functional aqueduct stenosis and should be treated by means of endoscopic assisted ventriculostomy.

Key words:

Endoscopic Ventriculostomy - Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus - Aqueduct Stenosis - Phase Contrast MRI

References

  • 1 Barlow P, Ching H S. An economic argument in favour of endoscopic third ventriculostomy as a treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997;  40 37-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 De Divitiis O. Provision of a neuroendoscopy service. The Southhampton experience.  J Neurosurg Sci. 1998;  42 137-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Foroutan M, Mafee M F, Dujovny M. Third ventriculostomy, phase-contrast cine MRI and endoscopic techniques.  Neurol Res. 1998;  20 443-448
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gaab M R, Schroeder H W. Neuroendoscopic approach to intraventricular lesions.  J Neurosurg. 1998;  88 496-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gangemi M, Maiuri F, Donati P, Sigona L, Iaconetta G, De Divitiis E. Neuroendoscopy: Personal experience, indications and limits.  J Neurosurg Sci. 1998;  42 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Meier U, Michalik M, Reichmuth B. Computertomographie und Infusionstest bei einem posttraumatischen Hydrocephalus.  Psychiatr Neurol med Psychol. 1987;  39 754-758
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Meier U, Reichmuth B, Zeilinger F S, Lehmann R. The Importance of xenon-computed tomography in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus.  Intern J Neuroradiology. 1996;  2 153-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Meier U. Der intrathekale Infusionstest als Entscheidungshilfe zur Shunt-Operation beim Normaldruckhydrozephalus.  Akt Neurologie. 1997;  24 24-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Meier U, Zeilinger F S, Kintzel D. Signs, symptoms and course of normal pressure hydrocephalus in comparison with cerebral atrophy.  Acta Neurochir. 1999;  141 1039-1048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Meier U, Künzel B, Zeilinger F S, Riederer A, Kintzel D. Diagnostics in normal pressure hydrocephalus: A mathematical model for determination of the ICP-dependent resistance and compliance.  Acta Neurochir. 1999;  141 941-948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Meier U, Zeilinger F S, Kintzel D. Pathophysiologie, Klinik und Krankheitsverlauf beim Normaldruckhydrozephalus.  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1998;  66 176-191
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Meier U. Zur klinischen Graduierung des Normaldruckhydrozephalus.  Akt Neurologie. 1999;  26 127-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Meier U, Zeilinger F S, Reyer T, Kintzel D. Klinische Erfahrungen mit verschiedenen Shuntsystemen beim Normaldruckhydrozephalus: Hydrostatische versus konventionelle Differentialdruckventile.  Zent bl Neurochir. 2000;  61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Miethke C, Affeld K. A new valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus.  Biomed Technik. 1994;  39 181-187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mohanty A, Anandh B, Reddy M S, Sastry K V. Contralateral massive acute subdural collection after endoscopic third ventriculostomy - a case report.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997;  40 59-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rodhe V, Reinges M H, Krombach G A, Gilsbach J M. The combined use of image-guided frameless stereotaxy and neuroendoscopy for surgical management of occlusive hydrocephalus and intracranial cysts.  Br J Neurosurg. 1998;  12 531-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schwartz T H, Yoon S S, Cutruzzola F W, Goodman R R. Third ventriculostomy: post-operative ventricular size and outcome.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1996;  39 122-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding Author:

Privatdozent Dr. med U Meier

Head of Department Department of Neurosurgery Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin

Warener Straße 7 12683 Berlin Germany

Phone: Phone:+49 30 5681-2701

Fax: Fax:+49 30 5681 2703

Email: E-mail: UllrichM@ukb.de

      >